Badmovies.org Forum

Other Topics => Off Topic Discussion => Topic started by: Scott on November 11, 2007, 12:07:20 PM



Title: Future Worlds?
Post by: Scott on November 11, 2007, 12:07:20 PM
Which should be the driving force or concern in your future world. Feel free to suggest other options. You can change your vote.

Also what other more specific aspects of the future interest you?


Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: CheezeFlixz on November 11, 2007, 12:11:54 PM
Technology - because it will lead to improvements in nearly all of the others, barring religion which should be personal and not national.


Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: Mr_Vindictive on November 11, 2007, 12:19:46 PM
I also voted technology for the same reasons that Cheeze mentioned. 


Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: RCMerchant on November 11, 2007, 02:47:59 PM
I agree with the technology...but I chose space travel...as that branch of technology is what facinates me the most.


Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: Scott on November 11, 2007, 07:38:03 PM
"Speaking of technology. Should the U.S. have ever shared our technology with the world during the past 100+ years for mere monetary profit of a few wealthy individuals?"

"Shouldn't all technology lead ultimately towards world conquest and unification of the world? Using and revealing these advances only when world conquest is undoubtably certain?"

(http://www.thechestnut.com/flash/ming.jpg)(http://www.personal.psu.edu/gms/su06/frylock.jpg)


Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: Andrew on November 11, 2007, 07:39:14 PM
It is hard to ignore technology, but I think my biggest wish is for education.  The more smart people in the world, the better (usually).


Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: Scott on November 11, 2007, 07:44:07 PM
How could I forget education. I'll add it to the list.


Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: CheezeFlixz on November 11, 2007, 08:15:33 PM
"Speaking of technology. Should the U.S. have ever shared our technology with the world during the past 100+ years for mere monetary profit of a few wealthy individuals?"

"Shouldn't all technology lead ultimately towards world conquest and unification of the world? Using and revealing these advances only when world conquest is undoubtably certain?"

([url]http://www.thechestnut.com/flash/ming.jpg[/url])([url]http://www.personal.psu.edu/gms/su06/frylock.jpg[/url])



To boldly go where no man has gone before ...
To seek out new life and new civilizations ...
etc etc

Actually the US gives away to much of it's technology for free.
GPS, Internet anyone?
We Americans paid to put it up there and private companies and other countries are getting rich off of it.
Same goes for weather satellites, the US paid most of them and every body uses them for free.
Global Tsunami warning systems
Global Earthquake warning systems
CDC information and vaccines
The Internet (US Military Invention)

What we could to is be real capitalist and pay off this debt by telling countries they have to start paying for our technology or we'll scramble it, like GPS signals. Which is often used against us.

I'm sticking with Technology, like the wheel, making fire, farming, construction, granted education is equality important but I believe man would learn, adapt and overcome regardless do to his inherent nature to explore ideas.



Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: Scott on November 11, 2007, 08:34:41 PM
To boldly go where no man has gone before ...
To seek out new life and new civilizations ...

You do understand.   :smile:


Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: RCMerchant on November 11, 2007, 08:48:23 PM
Gee...you guys are getting all deep . I just wanna see space monsters and wear a cool spacesuit!

 (http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l79/RCMerchant/533553209_f55cf99392_o.jpg)


Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: CheezeFlixz on November 11, 2007, 09:01:05 PM
To boldly go where no man has gone before ...
To seek out new life and new civilizations ...

You do understand.   :smile:

Yes I do, but the world will always have slackers and how do you deal with them?

I vote for vaporizing them, or sending them to the salt mine on Sirus Prime (or someplace equally sucky).


Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: Rev. Powell on November 12, 2007, 09:31:29 PM
I was honest and said entertainment.  After all, Scott did ask about MY future world.  I am most looking forward to the kung fu zombie exploding-head comedies of the future.


Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: Allhallowsday on November 12, 2007, 11:44:30 PM
"Speaking of technology. Should the U.S. have ever shared our technology with the world during the past 100+ years for mere monetary profit of a few wealthy individuals?"
"Shouldn't all technology lead ultimately towards world conquest and unification of the world? Using and revealing these advances only when world conquest is undoubtably certain?"
Well, bear in mind some important technology was pilfered or pirated (like nuclear fission).  When national security is at stake, tidbits were very closely guarded during the Cold War.  The absurd leaks in the naive past of wartime projects like "Manhattan," proved the undoing of the War's work. 


Title: Re: Future Worlds?
Post by: Scott on November 12, 2007, 11:49:04 PM
I was honest and said entertainment.  After all, Scott did ask about MY future world.  I am most looking forward to the kung fu zombie exploding-head comedies of the future.

As CheezeFlixz said "To boldly go where no man has gone before ...
To seek out new life and new civilizations ..."

Entertainment can take us there.

"Speaking of technology. Should the U.S. have ever shared our technology with the world during the past 100+ years for mere monetary profit of a few wealthy individuals?"
"Shouldn't all technology lead ultimately towards world conquest and unification of the world? Using and revealing these advances only when world conquest is undoubtedly certain?"
Well, bear in mind some important technology was pilfered or pirated (like nuclear fission).  When national security is at stake, tidbits were very closely guarded during the Cold War.  The absurd leaks in the naive past of wartime projects like "Manhattan," proved the undoing of the War's work. 

That would be a "big" tidbit. I'm sure it's hard to keep a secret and that may be why our nation has chosen to make a profit at it. I'd have to look into how so many secrets can "leak" from secrecy before deciding it's ok to share technology with the world.