Badmovies.org Forum

Other Topics => Off Topic Discussion => Topic started by: Svengoolie 3 on June 22, 2018, 05:14:26 AM



Title: Movie opinions.
Post by: Svengoolie 3 on June 22, 2018, 05:14:26 AM
The green slime was more entertaining than Avatar.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Svengoolie 3 on June 22, 2018, 05:15:29 AM
Star trek the motion picture was better than most give it credit for.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: RCMerchant on June 22, 2018, 10:19:42 AM
This whole board is about movie opinions.  :lookingup:
Why is it on "off topic?"  That's actually on topic.
So I'm a nitpicker.  :lookingup:


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: RCMerchant on June 22, 2018, 10:33:27 AM
PS.
I agree about the GREEN SLIME.
I thought STAR TREK: THE MOTION PICTURE was a bore fest. And I love STAR TREK- the 60's show.
the GREEN SLIME was better than the first Star Trek movie. It tried to be 2001: Part 2 and failed big time.
Shatner didn't scream or overact-where's the fun in that?


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Alex on June 22, 2018, 11:14:25 AM
I remember watching Star Trek: The (Slow) Motion Picture in the cinema as a kid. Not a fan.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: RCMerchant on June 22, 2018, 11:30:18 AM
I remember watching Star Trek: The (Slow) Motion Picture in the cinema as a kid. Not a fan.

 It tries to deal with the concept of God- and is just....dull. Brain dead slow. Not a good movie. Bad movie. Not in a BAD movie way. I would rather watch JOURNEY TO THE 7TH PLANET.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Svengoolie 3 on June 22, 2018, 06:46:37 PM
STTMP tried to bring a grand epic scale to SF we hadn't seen since movies like forbidden planet and 2001. Remember the huge krell machine?

The V'Ger was meant to create a sense of huge, awesome scale.

The production was riddled with problems, like the original v'ger model being accidentally destroyed, that hurt the finished product. But still at least it wasn't one shootout and explosion after another.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Gene Worm on June 23, 2018, 12:24:14 PM
"Humanoids of the Deep" is a vulgar insult to bad monster movies, and I don't get why people like it.

"The Lost Skeleton of Cadavra" is actually a pretty funny parody of old bad movies. The dialog, the acting, and the puppets are supposed to be bad, which is the joke that I think a lot of people seem to miss.

"Sharknado" was a fairly amusing concept, but got stale after about the third movie.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Alex on June 23, 2018, 06:08:43 PM
ST:T(S)MP came out not long after 2001 and the ending was very much inspired by it. They just failed to match it.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: indianasmith on June 23, 2018, 10:15:22 PM
1998's Oscars were the biggest ripoff ever.  SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE as Best Picture?
Over SAVING PRIVATE RYAN and ELIZABETH?

Ridiculous!


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Allhallowsday on June 24, 2018, 01:19:01 AM
THE WIZARD OF OZ (1939) is as good as Hollywood got. 

GERMANIA ANNO ZERO (1948) may be the most important film ever made. 

LA DOLCE VITA (1960) might be the greatest film ever made. 

YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN (1974) is as good as nostalgia can possibly get. 

The two greatest American Musical films were made in the 1970s: CABARET (1972) and ALL THAT JAZZ (1979). 

The greatest bad movie ever made is CARNIVAL OF SOULS (1962). 

The most influential bad movie ever made is LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT (1972). 

Of all the Horror films, TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (1974) is by far the best. 



Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Svengoolie 3 on June 24, 2018, 06:15:28 AM


YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN (1974) is as good as nostalgia can possibly get. 



if you like nostalgic films try to find "Zone troopers", a lovingly make tribute to the scifi of the 30's and 40's, when it was mostly pulp magazines and known now to true fhans as "The Gernsback era". It has bug eyes aliens, rockets with bell nozzles and rakish fins, ray guns and lots of dead nazis.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Allhallowsday on June 25, 2018, 03:40:29 PM
YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN (1974) is as good as nostalgia can possibly get. 
if you like nostalgic films try to find "Zone troopers", a lovingly make tribute to the scifi of the 30's and 40's, when it was mostly pulp magazines and known now to true fhans as "The Gernsback era". It has bug eyes aliens, rockets with bell nozzles and rakish fins, ray guns and lots of dead nazis.
Nope.  I'd like to see ZONE TROOPERS, though.
YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN is an exercise in nostalgia by mocking all of those FRANKENSTEIN movies it's nostalgic for.  Perfection. 


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: RCMerchant on June 25, 2018, 09:14:21 PM
 



Of all the Horror films, TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (1974) is by far the best.  



That's a BOLD statement, my friend.  
I mean, better than the BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN or KING KONG?

I'm not disagreeing, mind you- I think it's the best horror film of the 70's, but all time? Man, that's hard to pick just one.
(But even in the 70's there was the EXORCIST and ..... (cof cof) -DON'T LOOK IN THE BASEMENT )


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Allhallowsday on June 25, 2018, 10:03:21 PM

Of all the Horror films, TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (1974) is by far the best.  
That's a BOLD statement, my friend.  
I mean, better than the BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN or KING KONG?

I'm not disagreeing, mind you- I think it's the best horror film of the 70's, but all time? Man, that's hard to pick just one.
(But even in the 70's there was the EXORCIST and ..... (cof cof) -DON'T LOOK IN THE BASEMENT )

Are we talking HORROR or another topic?  I definitely would choose either KING KONG or BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN as more watchable... even ENDLESSLY WATCHABLE. 

But... HORROR.  Those movies don't intimidate me.  TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE intimidates me.  It's still scary.  I've seen the cruel, the gross, the revolting, the disturbing, the painful, but TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE is the only film that was relentless.  It's like a trap that doesn't kill the mouse, only makes it suffer.   :bluesad:   
If a HORROR fan has not seen TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, that fan does not yet know how great HORROR can be. 


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: RCMerchant on June 25, 2018, 10:10:51 PM

Of all the Horror films, TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (1974) is by far the best. 
That's a BOLD statement, my friend.   
I mean, better than the BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN or KING KONG?

I'm not disagreeing, mind you- I think it's the best horror film of the 70's, but all time? Man, that's hard to pick just one.
(But even in the 70's there was the EXORCIST and ..... (cof cof) -DON'T LOOK IN THE BASEMENT )

Are we talking HORROR or another topic?  I definitely would choose either KING KONG or BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN as more watchable... even ENDLESSLY WATCHABLE. 

But... HORROR.  Those movies don't intimidate me.  TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE intimidates me.  It's still scary.  I've seen the cruel, the gross, the revolting, the disturbing, the painful, but TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE is the only film that was relentless.  It's like a trap that doesn't kill the mouse, only makes it suffer.   :bluesad:   
If a HORROR fan has not seen TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, that fan does not yet know how great HORROR can be. 

So you mean Horror with a capital H !
Yeah- I can't argue with that. It was the first-and only-horror movie to scare the living daylight out of me. My teeth were actually chattering.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Allhallowsday on June 25, 2018, 10:11:25 PM
...
(But even in the 70's there was the EXORCIST and ..... (cof cof) -DON'T LOOK IN THE BASEMENT )
 

THE EXORCIST is a masterpiece of HORROR, second only to TCM.  

I'm impressed that you remember I don't particularly care for an outdoor table... oh, I mean: DON'T LOOK IN THE BASEMENT    
I must have told you that I do have fond memories of watching that 40 / 45 years ago... on late night TV.  
The crazy who pretends to be doctor crazy house is also the woman trapped by that kookoo in LARRY BUCHANAN's  "IT'S ALIVE"  


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: RCMerchant on June 25, 2018, 10:15:48 PM
...
(But even in the 70's there was the EXORCIST and ..... (cof cof) -DON'T LOOK IN THE BASEMENT )
 

THE EXORCIST is a masterpiece of HORROR, second only to TCM.  

I'm impressed that you remember I don't particularly care for an outdoor table... oh, I mean: DON'T LOOK IN THE BASEMENT    
I must have told you that I do have fond memories of watching that 40 / 45 years ago... on late night TV.  
The crazy who pretends to be doctor crazy house is also the woman trapped by that kookoo in LARRY BUCHANAN's  "IT'S ALIVE"  

The big black guy who eats popsicles is also in that movie!


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: The Burgomaster on June 26, 2018, 06:21:11 PM
I can spend a very enjoyable Saturday with a tub of popcorn and:

* The War of the Worlds (1953)
* The Blob (1958)
* The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957)
* Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)
* Journey to the Center of the Earth (1959)

OR

* Any 5 Hammer Frankenstein and/or Dracula movies

These aren't the best movies ever made, but they make for some damn comfortable Saturday viewing.



Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: RCMerchant on June 27, 2018, 09:31:48 AM
I can spend a very enjoyable Saturday with a tub of popcorn and:

* The War of the Worlds (1953)
* The Blob (1958)
* The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957)
* Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)
* Journey to the Center of the Earth (1959)

OR

* Any 5 Hammer Frankenstein and/or Dracula movies

These aren't the best movies ever made, but they make for some damn comfortable Saturday viewing.



I'll agree with ALL of those!  :cheers:

Or...
. PLANET OF THE APES (1968)
. the DAY THE WORLD ENDED (1956)
. INVADERS FROM MARS (1953)
. EARTH VS THE FLYING SAUCERS (1956)


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Svengoolie 3 on June 27, 2018, 01:48:13 PM
YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN (1974) is as good as nostalgia can possibly get. 
if you like nostalgic films try to find "Zone troopers", a lovingly make tribute to the scifi of the 30's and 40's, when it was mostly pulp magazines and known now to true fhans as "The Gernsback era". It has bug eyes aliens, rockets with bell nozzles and rakish fins, ray guns and lots of dead nazis.
Nope.  I'd like to see ZONE TROOPERS, though.
YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN is an exercise in nostalgia by mocking all of those FRANKENSTEIN movies it's nostalgic for.  Perfection. 

If you haven't seen Zone Troopers how can you say I'm wrong about it given that I've seen it?


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Allhallowsday on June 28, 2018, 10:15:40 AM
YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN (1974) is as good as nostalgia can possibly get. 
if you like nostalgic films try to find "Zone troopers", a lovingly make tribute to the scifi of the 30's and 40's, when it was mostly pulp magazines and known now to true fhans as "The Gernsback era". It has bug eyes aliens, rockets with bell nozzles and rakish fins, ray guns and lots of dead nazis.
Nope.  I'd like to see ZONE TROOPERS, though.
YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN is an exercise in nostalgia by mocking all of those FRANKENSTEIN movies it's nostalgic for.  Perfection. 

If you haven't seen Zone Troopers how can you say I'm wrong about it given that I've seen it?

  You wrote "If you like nostalgic films"...  I don't.  Capiche? 


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: RCMerchant on June 28, 2018, 10:43:52 AM
I may be the only person who prefers Shemp over Curly.

(https://i.imgur.com/Eg6xLV4.gif) (https://lunapic.com)

Joe Besser was better on the ABBOT AND COSTELLO SHOW, dressed as  a little kid with a big lollipop- "I'll give you such a pinch!"
Joe DeVita was worthless. He didn't do anything He didn't like being hit.
Than wtf are you doing in the 3 Stooges? Larry ALWAYS took a hit. That was Larry's job. He didn't hit someone on purpose too much, but he got his s**t slapped and poked. And his hair pulled out.

Larry is very underrated. I always loved Larry.

But Moe is my favorite.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: RCMerchant on June 28, 2018, 12:16:33 PM
As far as nostalgia movies, ED WOOD will always be my favorite.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Svengoolie 3 on June 28, 2018, 05:13:22 PM
As far as nostalgia movies, ED WOOD will always be my favorite.

Hey rc, I saw you had zero karma and tried to give you some but it said I couldn't modify your karma.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: The Burgomaster on June 28, 2018, 06:17:18 PM
Larry is very underrated. I always loved Larry.

Larry is great. He has some of the best offhand comments.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: indianasmith on June 28, 2018, 06:29:36 PM
As far as nostalgia movies, ED WOOD will always be my favorite.

Hey rc, I saw you had zero karma and tried to give you some but it said I couldn't modify your karma.

RC had his karma turned off years ago.  At one time his was the highest on the board!


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Svengoolie 3 on June 28, 2018, 06:40:50 PM
Thanks for the answer


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: RCMerchant on June 28, 2018, 07:22:19 PM
As far as nostalgia movies, ED WOOD will always be my favorite.

Hey rc, I saw you had zero karma and tried to give you some but it said I couldn't modify your karma.

Yeah, I had it disabled about 2008, I think.
It just seemed like a contest I didn't want to be in.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Svengoolie 3 on June 28, 2018, 08:10:31 PM
I think the space bird in "the giant claw" was a better monster than the one in "Reptillicus".




Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: RCMerchant on June 28, 2018, 11:13:20 PM
I think the space bird in "the giant claw" was a better monster than the one in "Reptillicus".




I'll agree with that!  :cheers:

Besides- "It's as big as a battleship!"

One of the  most "what the f**k were they thinking?" monsters ever.
But he has a cool Mohawk!

(https://i.imgur.com/yYKh65M.jpg) (https://lunapic.com)



Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Svengoolie 3 on June 29, 2018, 01:44:05 AM
And honestly, what doesn't look better than this?

http://youtu.be/glJLn1dBoPI (http://youtu.be/glJLn1dBoPI)


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: RCMerchant on June 29, 2018, 02:11:23 AM
I dunno. I cant' see videos anymore. That's why I post more pictures.
I know you can see them.


Title: Re: Movie opinions.
Post by: Svengoolie 3 on June 29, 2018, 02:42:01 AM
An image of repticillicus in all it's "glory". Yes, the trumpian tiny "hands"/forelegs/paws(?) are utterly immobile and stiffly fixed to the body. Yes it has tiny, immobile wings.  Yes the mouth is cleanly sealed in the back. Yes it is eating a segmented cut out picture of a man.

(https://68.media.tumblr.com/31ae90fad186c48de77b6d7b690a4c23/tumblr_nre6zxsXFY1ti67m2o4_1280.png)

(https://cdn.pastemagazine.com/www/articles/reptilicus%20main.jpg)

(https://gooberzilla.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/gobble.png)

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_DMT9SbnvRzo/TLgIJs4PqoI/AAAAAAAAFIg/j8O0vNLyQlM/s1600/rep+mocks.png)