Badmovies.org Forum

Information Exchange => Reader Comments => Topic started by: Andrew on March 21, 2010, 07:33:09 AM



Title: Feast II
Post by: Andrew on March 21, 2010, 07:33:09 AM
This picks up where "Feast" left off, and attempts to replicate the first film's formula.  It has monsters, topless biker babes, and midget luchadores, but only succeeds in being vulgar and distasteful.

Click here to go to the Review (http://www.badmovies.org/capsules/f/feastii/)


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: InformationGeek on March 21, 2010, 01:38:07 PM
The scene where the monster killed baby (I think if I remember correctly) is terrible and reminds me to never watch this series again.  There are some things that make me drop a series and that would be one of them.


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: Wednesday\'sChild on March 21, 2010, 02:41:08 PM
I am glad I read this review before watching this movie, which I happened to have picked up recently and have sitting in the to watch pile. I would not have liked the baby eating scene.


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: Andrew on March 21, 2010, 05:59:29 PM
I am glad I read this review before watching this movie, which I happened to have picked up recently and have sitting in the to watch pile. I would not have liked the baby eating scene.

They went beyond just a monster eating the baby, because that's what this film does - it constantly goes too far.


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: skuts on March 22, 2010, 07:44:01 AM
The cat raping and baby eating scenes were the best parts of the movie!


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: DreadDan on March 22, 2010, 06:33:46 PM
hmm, another anime mention. perhaps we have ourselves a rare example of military anime fan?

ah well it probably isnt as bad as some stuff Ive seen like the new texas chainsaw massacre, and the hostel films.


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: Jordan on March 23, 2010, 12:31:49 AM
I actually liked "Feast II" Andrew, despite the extreme depths of depravity it reaches. The scene with the baby ROCKED me; I've never seen anything like it any films prior to, or after "Feast II." It was going too far, and it kind of upset my girlfriend, though I think my laughing upset her even more. (What can I say, I have a pretty sick sense of humor.) I still can't believe that they got away with that in this movie....

If you think this is bad, don't bother with "Feast III." It was all sorts of terrible and didn't entertain me very much... well, except for the hilarious "Rambo III" reference.


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: JasonZ on March 24, 2010, 07:30:45 AM
Baby eating is pretty messed up, however Feast II isn't the first film to do it.  If you want to REALLY ruin your day, watch Joe D'Amato's Anthropophagus (a.k.a The Grim Reaper).  It has a scene in which the cannibal killer rips the fetus from a pregnant woman and begins to eat it.  It's a cheaply done scene, but effective.  Just keep telling yourself that's a honey glazed ham he's eating.  That's actually what they used for the special effect.  Sadly, that scene is probably the high point of the entire film.


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: indianasmith on March 24, 2010, 06:40:29 PM
That movie scared me so bad when I was 17 that I walked out of the theater!!! Incredibly creepy!


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: Torgo on March 25, 2010, 06:48:35 AM
The first Feast was a big surprise for me as I thought it was one of the best horror movies in quite some time.

The sequels on the other hand were a couple of the worst horror movies that have evern come along.


Title: It sucks big time
Post by: Yannick on March 25, 2010, 03:48:55 PM
Feast was one breath of fresh air when it came to horror movies, i really enjoyed that movie, but sadly the world today as to do sequels because its big money.

I was looking forward for Feast 2, after all sequels always have more then the first one right, more blood, monsters, sexy women and more.

Well i never could watch that movie all the way because it sucks so much, in fact i was feeling bored from the very start.

They say that Feast 3 is a lot better i might give it a try if i can find it very cheap at a local video store not more then 99 cent LOL


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: Jordan on March 25, 2010, 11:04:33 PM
Baby eating is pretty messed up, however Feast II isn't the first film to do it.  If you want to REALLY ruin your day, watch Joe D'Amato's Anthropophagus (a.k.a The Grim Reaper).  It has a scene in which the cannibal killer rips the fetus from a pregnant woman and begins to eat it.  It's a cheaply done scene, but effective.  Just keep telling yourself that's a honey glazed ham he's eating.  That's actually what they used for the special effect.  Sadly, that scene is probably the high point of the entire film.

I think they do the same thing in a (terrible) recent zombie film called "Automaton Transfusion." I haven't seen it myself, but I believe that I saw a video clip that matches the scene from "Grim Reaper" you just mentioned Jason.


Title: So i had to watch it then
Post by: Yannick on March 27, 2010, 07:47:16 AM
 :hot: guess that i needed to watch that movie from start to end to make up a real opinion on it. So i guess i did along with Feast 3 happy finish.

Well all i have to say is that from now on, i will treat Feast 2005 the first movie as a the only movie that was done and completely forget the two others.

As for feast 2 sloppy second i felt like i was watching a type of movie that kept pushing it, filled with jokes about the book the secret that was at least funny but i did not laugh at the baby part at all that was dumb, and the type of dark humor when it came to people getting pooped in the face, p**sed on and trowed up on, that was just plain stupid.

Part 3 could have been something if they really tried, at least to explain where the creatures came from, why they looked like that and more, but again they blew it off with some other lame crap as in feast2 , finishing the movie having secret and the midget wrestler being squashed by a giant mechanical leg.....................

The ending of that movie made me say what the F.... , i return both movies to the video store the same day and told the cashier to burn that crap.


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: Phantazm on March 31, 2010, 01:10:34 AM
I gotta agree with the others who said that the dead baby segment was a total buzz-killer for me.  (I've actually seen dead babies when I worked in a morgue.  "Downer" doesn't even begin to cover it.)  It seems like the writers were just trying to be as mean and spiteful as they could in the name of "shock value," but for my two cents, they just ended up sucking.

That ruined an otherwise good(ish) movie that had all the trappings of a classic with biker babe boobies, guns, and midget luchadors on catapults.  Sad.


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: JPickettIII on April 01, 2010, 11:42:36 AM
I have a question.  What the heck is the humanoid monster thingy that is pictured on the home page for Feast II?  I thought that the monsters were smaller not bipedal.  Is this a mutation like Tremors where there were the bipedal that could sense heat?

Just wondering.

Thanks, :question:


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: Spanish Girl on April 19, 2010, 12:30:21 AM
I've seen all the Feast movies and I LOVE THEM!!!

They are gross and over the top and shocking and such rollicking good fun.  Nude biker chicks, guys with poles through their heads, cat raping, baby killing, grandmother liquification, dwarf tossing - these movies have it all and then some. :cheers:

If ever I need a good laugh, I turn to these guys.  I particularly like the way nobody is safe including the hero/heroine and if they die, it's in the most shocking unexpected ways.

I hope these guys make another movie but this time they should go back to before the first one so we can see where the aliens came from.  Keep up the good work guys, you have an eternal fan in me.


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: cwalker on April 23, 2010, 10:31:11 AM
i din't think i had seen this movie,but in the side bar i saw a 'flying baby' and recalled that i DID watch this sorry piece of flim.the fact that the baby is eaten ISN"T the worst part, it is that the adult SACRIFICES it to save his own skin that made me sick.my only complaint is that you gave this a rating of one slime,not a skull,but i agree with your review.an absolutely nasty movie devoid of worth as celluloid.  :hatred:


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: vukxfiles on May 23, 2010, 01:31:14 PM
For the person that said about the fetus eating in Anthropophagus: It's very different to see someone eating a foetus, which doesn't even seem alive, and seeing a live crying cute baby being eaten.


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: Doggett on November 22, 2010, 07:34:09 AM
I liked it.  :question:

(Its not a real baby.... Its make believe...)

Secrets was horrid though...


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: Jack on November 22, 2010, 08:17:57 AM
It's on the top of my Netflix queue.  I'm too stupid to learn from the mistakes of others   :smile:


Title: Re: Feast II
Post by: claws on November 22, 2010, 09:41:22 AM
A former (female) online friend send me her DVD for free because she hated the movie and wanted to get rid off it right away.
The reason she hated it? Feast II is misogyny and political incorrect.

It does kinda work like a glossy Troma movie though. I enjoyed all three Feast flicks.