|
Title: 2013 Razzie Nominees Are... Post by: InformationGeek on January 09, 2013, 01:43:06 PM http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/01/09/twilight-breaking-dawn-part-2-leads-razzie-noms (http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/01/09/twilight-breaking-dawn-part-2-leads-razzie-noms)
Considering the Razzies bias, I know what I'm betting on to win a lot of the awards, even though some of the nominees deserve the dishonor more... Title: Re: 2013 Razzie Nominees Are... Post by: tracy on January 09, 2013, 01:54:05 PM A familiar list of suspects,looks like to me.
Title: Re: 2013 Razzie Nominees Are... Post by: El Misfit on January 09, 2013, 02:59:04 PM Quote Worst Screen Couple Any two cast members from Jersey Shore in The Three Stooges (http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/244/589/05d.gif) (p.s.- Info geek, do you know what anime this is from?) Title: Re: 2013 Razzie Nominees Are... Post by: ChaosTheory on January 09, 2013, 03:37:50 PM Hmmm, pretty predictable. They should probably just rename the award The Sandlers and get it over with. :wink:
Of the nominees I've seen BATTLESHIP, SEEKING JUSTICE, GHOST RIDER & THE THREE STOOGES. Out of those, SEEKING JUSTICE was by far the worst. I would submit the Worst Couple nominations should be all the pairings from FRIENDS WITH KIDS and I don't think the nom for Liam Neeson is entirely fair, but whatever. Title: Re: 2013 Razzie Nominees Are... Post by: InformationGeek on January 09, 2013, 07:50:48 PM Quote Worst Screen Couple Any two cast members from Jersey Shore in The Three Stooges ([url]http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/244/589/05d.gif[/url]) (p.s.- Info geek, do you know what anime this is from?) Death Note. Please, a real challenge. :teddyr: Title: Re: 2013 Razzie Nominees Are... Post by: BoyScoutKevin on January 15, 2013, 04:01:31 PM [url]http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/01/09/twilight-breaking-dawn-part-2-leads-razzie-noms[/url] ([url]http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/01/09/twilight-breaking-dawn-part-2-leads-razzie-noms[/url]) Considering the Razzies bias, I know what I'm betting on to win a lot of the awards, even though some of the nominees deserve the dishonor more... To a great extent, I agree. Whatever criteria they use, certainly, unpopularity with movie audiences is not one of them. Neither here: where last year's "Twilight" will no doubt be one of the highest grossing films of the year. Nor overseas: "Battleship" may not have been so popular here, but overseas it was popular enough to gross over $200 million, or enough to earn back the cost to make it. And their selction of the "worst" is made suspect by the lack of "Playback" and/or Christian Slater, the best known star, excluding Daryl "Chill" Mitchell in a cast of basically unknowns. Of course, it may be that no one on the selecting committee saw "Playback," as it set some sort of record for lowest gross on opening day, earning only $252, that's right $252, on a film that cost $7,500,000. Title: Re: 2013 Razzie Nominees Are... Post by: SynapticBoomstick on January 17, 2013, 10:57:15 AM I've no more regard for the Razzies than I do for the Golden Globes or the Academy Awards. I never agree with what these judges deem as "good" or "bad". :lookingup:
|