Badmovies.org Forum

Movies => Bad Movies => Topic started by: Puma81 on July 10, 2013, 05:47:53 PM



Title: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: Puma81 on July 10, 2013, 05:47:53 PM
Would you rather...
1. Watch a good movie OR an enjoyably BAD movie?
2. Have a collection of good movies OR enjoyably BAD movies?
3. Have good movies remade into BAD movies OR BAD movies remade into good movies?

4. Have direct Battle Angel - James Cameron OR Andy Sidaris?
5. Have direct Avengers 2 - Joss Wheedon OR Godfrey Ho?
6. Have direct Birdemic 3 - James Nguyen OR Quentin Tarantino?


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: Puma81 on July 10, 2013, 11:00:48 PM
I'll go first, I guess.

1. Bad
2. Bad
3. good into Bad

4. Sidaris
5. Wheedon
6. Tarantino


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: Jack on July 11, 2013, 06:45:10 AM
1)  Enjoyably bad.  I like good movies but big budget Hollywood does not equal good IMO.  Just don't have much interest in 90% of the stuff they put out.

2)  My DVD collection is probably 80 - 90 percent low budget junk, so I guess that answers that question  :bouncegiggle:

3)  Hollywood's already remade just about everything, good bad or indifferent.  They s*** all over the source material and make it into their usual generic bilge.  It's pointless.  I much prefer when the Asylum makes some crummy thing that coincidentally has a title that's nearly identical to this week's blockbuster in the theaters. 


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: Rev. Powell on July 11, 2013, 08:57:30 AM
I'll skip the first three questions because of it's too difficult to define "bad" and "good." But in general, however much I love bad movies, I wouldn't want to live on a diet of them alone. I consider them more as treats.

4. Don't know what BATTLE ANGEL is but I'd rather seen almost anything directed by Andy Sidaris than almost anything directed by James Cameron. It's too bad Andy's dead but maybe his son Drew could direct.
5. Ho.
6. Tarantino.


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: SynapticBoomstick on July 11, 2013, 09:59:13 AM
1. Depends on the movie - a lot of "good" movies don't fit my tastes so I'd probably rather watch an enjoyable bad movie.
2. I already have a collection of enjoyable bad movies? :cheers:
3. The former already happens all the time. I'm not sure that the latter has yet.

4. I need to do more research here before choosing.
5. I'm a Wheedon fan so I say Wheedon, I very much had my butt kicked by Avengers.
6. No.


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: Criswell on July 11, 2013, 10:16:01 AM
1. Depends on my mood.
2. I already have both :)
3. Bad movies remade into good movies.

4. Sidaris
5. Ho, Then it would just be redubed footage of the first Avengers.
6. Make them collaborate.


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: ChaosTheory on July 11, 2013, 12:11:01 PM
1.  If I'm by myself, a good movie.  If I'm with friends (and we have alcohol), enjoyably bad. 
2.  My collection is pretty evenly mixed, to be honest.
3.  Neither.
4.  If there was a way to bring back 80s Cameron, I'd go with Cameron. 
5.  To be honest, if I never see another superhero movie or anything involving Joss Whedon again, I'd be perfectly fine with it.
6.  Tommy Wiseau


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: Puma81 on July 11, 2013, 04:50:45 PM
1.  If I'm by myself, a good movie.  If I'm with friends (and we have alcohol), enjoyably bad. 
2.  My collection is pretty evenly mixed, to be honest.
3.  Neither.
4.  If there was a way to bring back 80s Cameron, I'd go with Cameron. 
5.  To be honest, if I never see another superhero movie or anything involving Joss Whedon again, I'd be perfectly fine with it.
6.  Tommy Wiseau

Haha. I'm changing all my answers to yours. How perfect.


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: zombie no.one on July 11, 2013, 05:32:30 PM
I'll skip the first three questions because of it's too difficult to define "bad" and "good."

yep, very difficult because an enjoyably bad movie is a good movie in the sense that anything "enjoyable" must = "good". on the other end of the scale loads of "good" movies are only considered good because they're proficient enough to be immune from mockery, but this doesn't mean they're "enjoyable".

so in the end there's 4 categories: bad bad movies, good bad movies, bad good movies, and good good movies

...or 5 if you include movies that are just 'average'  :teddyr:


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: Puma81 on July 11, 2013, 05:53:18 PM
haha, jeeeez. It's so true.

BUT, I think you jokers know EXACTLY what I meant  :tongueout:


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: zombie no.one on July 11, 2013, 08:21:30 PM
hah, well ok, without the smart-ass analysis...

1. Watch a good movie OR an enjoyably BAD movie?

much as I love enjoyably bad movies, it would have to be a genuinely good movie. it's close... but a movie that really hits you and strikes you as an amazing piece of work... you can't beat that.

2. Have a collection of good movies OR enjoyably BAD movies?

despite my answer to 1., I'd go with enjoyably bad movies just because they seem to be more re-watchable, and also better to watch with friends as previously pointed out.

3. Have good movies remade into BAD movies OR BAD movies remade into good movies?

well there's plenty of the former, so how about some bad movies remade into good movies - like a big budget, oscar-worthy remake of CHOPPING MALL directed by Coen Brothers. or something.


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: Rev. Powell on July 12, 2013, 08:15:19 AM
haha, jeeeez. It's so true.

BUT, I think you jokers know EXACTLY what I meant  :tongueout:

OK, going by what I think you meant:

1. Good
2. Good
3. Bad into good

Like I said, I love enjoyable bad movies, but like junk food they're better as an occasional treat than a steady diet.


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: JayJayM12 on July 16, 2013, 09:19:09 AM
1.  I like both, but if I'm being honest, if I have complete control, I tend to reach for an enjoyable bad one about 72% of the time (I did the math.  No, I didn't)

2.  Definitely bad on this one.  The majority of my collection is bad movies.  Not because I don't enjoy the good ones, but because the bad ones tend to be a little harder to find, so I snatch it up right away when I see it.  I have a pretty decent share of good ones, too, but they can usually be watched anywhere.

3.  Good remade into bad.  Could be a lot of fun if all good movies were remade into bad movies a la all the porn parodies out there...

4.  Andy Sidaris

5.  Joss Whedon

6.  James Nguyen (actually, he should take a first stab at directing EVERYTHING and then include his version on the blu rays of the real movies)


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: Trevor on July 18, 2013, 02:59:18 AM
Would you rather...
1. Watch a good movie OR an enjoyably BAD movie?
Both.
2. Have a collection of good movies OR enjoyably BAD movies?
I have both of those already
3. Have good movies remade into BAD movies OR BAD movies remade into good movies?
No remakes of anything, thanks.
4. Have direct Battle Angel - James Cameron OR Andy Sidaris?
James Cameron: I think Andy Sidaris passed away.
5. Have direct Avengers 2 - Joss Wheedon OR Godfrey Ho?
Godfrey Ho
6. Have direct Birdemic 3 - James Nguyen OR Quentin Tarantino?
QT


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: El Misfit on July 18, 2013, 09:32:04 PM
my response to the questions-
(http://i2.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/006/759/both.png)


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: RCMerchant on July 22, 2013, 07:34:47 AM
1.Some bad movies are very good,like BRIDE OF THE MONSTER.Some supposed "good "movies movies are s**t. Like TITANIC.
2.I got lots of both.See above!  :wink:
3.I dont think I ever wanna see a classic like ROBOT MONSTER remade in any form.
4.Direct Battle? I dont know-but Sidaris allows has big tittie girls,so...
5.I dont care.I like the 60's comic books over any of the movies.
6.BIRDEMIC 1 was enuff.


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: pizdatrica on July 23, 2013, 12:17:07 PM
1. Depends on the movie, and how much it keeps me entertained. As long as I keep my eyes glued to the screen, and not watching the clock.

2. Well, having a collection of good movies is such a mainstream thing, and dull. It is much cooler to have a collection of bad, obscure, rare movies that nobody knows exist.

3. I like it when bad movies get remakes, it just shows how popular they've become regardless of being bad.

4. I don't know what Battle Angel is :P

5. I don't even know these directors so I don't hive a horse's ass who directs it, as long as the movie is entertaining.

6. Definitely Quentin Tarantino :D


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: Gst0395 on July 25, 2013, 03:51:51 PM
1. Well I suppose it depends on how enjoyably bad the movie is, but yeah I'd rather watch a good movie.
2. Good movies, I mostly watch bad movies online, though I suppose I'd have both.
3. I guess if it was a hilarious bad and bastardized version of a classic movie, it could provide some laughs. Some bad movies also have great concepts but horrible executions, so I'm in favor of good remakes as well.

I'll stop there.


Title: Re: Would You Rather... ? (Bad Movie Edition)
Post by: CalrissianFoxxSteele on August 01, 2013, 11:51:18 AM
1. Watch a good movie
2. Have a collection of good movies
3. BAD movies remade into good movies?

4. James Cameron
5. Joss Wheedon
6. Quentin Tarantino?