|
Title: Short Action Movie Post by: ProZombie on February 09, 2014, 06:06:05 AM Hi everybody,
is anyone of you interested in making films? I would like to show you my recent movie called "The Legendary Life Of Chuck" It is a sequel of "Zombiebusters - the fairytale part II" and deals with an unchallenged Cop, Bad Guys, A Crazy Doc, Zombies... Hope you like it. It would be nice, if you can give some feedback. : ) youtube.com/watch?v=cZe0M6eRGUc (sorry, can't post links) s1.directupload.net/images/140118/gfmipipg.jpg (Cover) Title: Re: Short Action Movie Post by: claws on February 09, 2014, 07:55:46 AM Third forum in two days where I post :bouncegiggle:
Title: Re: Short Action Movie Post by: indianasmith on February 09, 2014, 09:58:25 AM At least this is how it should be done. He freely acknowledges the movie is his and asks for honest feedback, rather than posing as a rabid fan.
Title: Re: Short Action Movie Post by: Javakoala on February 09, 2014, 10:21:07 AM Interesting. Better than most shot on video stuff I've seen. The images are clean and crisp. Good use of angles with the camera work. Acting was okay. I can accept the one-liners as both homage and the fact the character seems obsessed with action films. CGI is noticeable but not without its charm.
Two things I loved (and I'm serious, folks, this stuff is in there): the penguin character, and the fairy at the very, very end. Title: Re: Short Action Movie Post by: ProZombie on February 10, 2014, 01:03:50 PM Third forum in two days where I post :bouncegiggle: Thanks for your recognition ;) At least this is how it should be done. He freely acknowledges the movie is his and asks for honest feedback, rather than posing as a rabid fan. Thx, I appreciate your opinion. My intention was indeed to spread the movie for getting constructive ideas, what can be done better the next time. Interesting. Better than most shot on video stuff I've seen. The images are clean and crisp. Good use of angles with the camera work. Acting was okay. I can accept the one-liners as both homage and the fact the character seems obsessed with action films. CGI is noticeable but not without its charm. Two things I loved (and I'm serious, folks, this stuff is in there): the penguin character, and the fairy at the very, very end. Thanks for your feedback, I'm really pleased of what you said. But could you please define your thinking about the CGI? I am not sure, if I got your point Title: Re: Short Action Movie Post by: Javakoala on February 10, 2014, 05:32:10 PM The CGI did not look organic to the action, meaning it did not look realistic and drew attention to itself. However, given the fantasy elements of the film itself, the fact that the CGI was not realistic somewhat added to the overall fun and silliness of the film.
I hope that explains things better. And if it makes you feel any better, the CGI in Argento's Dracula 3D wasn't very convincing, and it did NOT add any charm to that movie, so you are one up on an iconic director. :teddyr: Title: Re: Short Action Movie Post by: Andrew on February 10, 2014, 08:27:30 PM The CGI did not look organic to the action, meaning it did not look realistic and drew attention to itself. However, given the fantasy elements of the film itself, the fact that the CGI was not realistic somewhat added to the overall fun and silliness of the film. I hope that explains things better. And if it makes you feel any better, the CGI in Argento's Dracula 3D wasn't very convincing, and it did NOT add any charm to that movie, so you are one up on an iconic director. :teddyr: My feeling is that a movie does not need to look real. Rather, it should tell a story. Philip J. Cook does a good job of this in "Despiser" (2003). I'd like to echo the thanks for being upfront. |