Badmovies.org Forum

Movies => Bad Movies => Topic started by: Trevor on March 12, 2014, 01:36:25 AM



Title: The Starving Games (2013)
Post by: Trevor on March 12, 2014, 01:36:25 AM
What the heck is this?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Starving_Games (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Starving_Games)

Kantmis Evershot:  :bouncegiggle: :teddyr:


Title: Re: The Starving Games (2013)
Post by: Flangepart on March 14, 2014, 08:14:42 AM
THIS version...I might watch.


Title: Re: The Starving Games (2013)
Post by: Chainsawmidget on March 14, 2014, 08:19:03 AM
I love the reception there.

Max Nicholson of IGN called it "a horrible, horrible piece of cinema that needn't be watched by any person ever."

Even the plot summary there sounds painful. 


Title: Re: The Starving Games (2013)
Post by: Trevor on March 14, 2014, 08:57:45 AM
Max Nicholson of IGN called it "a horrible, horrible piece of cinema that needn't be watched by any person ever."

I am awaiting its' South African release date.  :wink:


Title: Re: The Starving Games (2013)
Post by: Chainsawmidget on March 14, 2014, 11:56:06 AM
Max Nicholson of IGN called it "a horrible, horrible piece of cinema that needn't be watched by any person ever."

I am awaiting its' South African release date.  :wink:
No, Trevor.  Don't support these people.  If people actually pay money to see these movies, they'll just think that the audiance wants more of them.


Title: Re: The Starving Games (2013)
Post by: Rev. Powell on March 14, 2014, 12:15:33 PM
Max Nicholson of IGN called it "a horrible, horrible piece of cinema that needn't be watched by any person ever."

I am awaiting its' South African release date.  :wink:
No, Trevor.  Don't support these people.  If people actually pay money to see these movies, they'll just think that the audiance wants more of them.

I just looked up Friedman and Seltzer on Wikipedia. Every single movie they have made has turned a profit (STARVING GAMES hasn't yet, but probably will). SCARY MOVIE (probably the best one) made back 14 times its budget. They aren't going anywhere anytime soon. I weep.


Title: Re: The Starving Games (2013)
Post by: claws on March 14, 2014, 12:17:02 PM
The guys behind The Starving Games also did:

Disaster Movie (2008) 1.9/10 IMDb Rating
Epic Movie (2007) 2.3/10
Meet the Spartans (2008) 2.6/10
Date Movie (2006) 2.7/10
Vampires Suck (2010) 3.5/10


Title: Re: The Starving Games (2013)
Post by: Chainsawmidget on March 14, 2014, 12:30:59 PM
I just looked up Friedman and Seltzer on Wikipedia. Every single movie they have made has turned a profit (STARVING GAMES hasn't yet, but probably will). SCARY MOVIE (probably the best one) made back 14 times its budget. They aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
Maybe they are, maybe they're not.  We don't know how long the contract they made with Satan lasts. 


Title: Re: The Starving Games (2013)
Post by: Flangepart on March 14, 2014, 12:53:16 PM
The guys behind The Starving Games also did:

Disaster Movie (2008) 1.9/10 IMDb Rating
Epic Movie (2007) 2.3/10
Meet the Spartans (2008) 2.6/10
Date Movie (2006) 2.7/10
Vampires Suck (2010) 3.5/10
YEEPS! Maybe I won't...


Title: Re: The Starving Games (2013)
Post by: BoyScoutKevin on March 24, 2014, 06:31:22 PM
The guys behind The Starving Games also did:

Disaster Movie (2008) 1.9/10 IMDb Rating
Epic Movie (2007) 2.3/10
Meet the Spartans (2008) 2.6/10
Date Movie (2006) 2.7/10
Vampires Suck (2010) 3.5/10
YEEPS! Maybe I won't...

I look at it this way. They went from 1.9 and 2.6 in 2008 to 3.5 in 2010. It looks like they are getting better. And if they keep at it for another 10 or so years, they might actually make something that's decent.


Title: Re: The Starving Games (2013)
Post by: Trevor on March 25, 2014, 12:45:36 AM
I look at it this way. They went from 1.9 and 2.6 in 2008 to 3.5 in 2010. It looks like they are getting better. And if they keep at it for another 10 or so years, they might actually make something that's decent.

Agreed: even Uwe Boll got that right with Darfur/Attack On Darfur.  :smile: