|
Title: Diabolik. Post by: Svengoolie 3 on December 13, 2017, 09:16:07 PM I just had to say I'm amazed no one here has reviewed the classic crime fantasy "diabolik" yet. You sure as hell reviewed Barbarella and it was pretty much a stable mate to Diabolik. What, can't make any cheap shots at Jane Fonda in a diabolik review?
You know this movie had the honor of being the last film done on MST3K... Title: Re: Diabolik. Post by: Ticonderoga 64 on December 14, 2017, 08:08:10 AM A little known Mario Bava gem, but still pretty well done for it's time. :smile:
Title: Re: Diabolik. Post by: RCMerchant on December 14, 2017, 01:02:24 PM I've yet to see it.
As far as new reviews-well,beyond reader reviews-Andrew-who was the webmaster for BAD MOVIES.ORG is long gone... :bluesad: Title: Re: Diabolik. Post by: Svengoolie 3 on December 14, 2017, 03:04:55 PM I've yet to see it. As far as new reviews-well,beyond reader reviews-Andrew-who was the webmaster for BAD MOVIES.ORG is long gone... :bluesad: Was he the only person who could do reviews? Did he die and no one else has access? Title: Re: Diabolik. Post by: javakoala on December 14, 2017, 06:05:03 PM I've yet to see it. As far as new reviews-well,beyond reader reviews-Andrew-who was the webmaster for BAD MOVIES.ORG is long gone... :bluesad: Was he the only person who could do reviews? Did he die and no one else has access? It is/was his site, so he did the primary site reviews. Kinda miss those. Since he moved on, no one has done the primary reviews for the site. Not sure about the access issue. Title: Re: Diabolik. Post by: Pacman000 on December 14, 2017, 07:03:47 PM Older websites often had one author who maintained everything. If there was user generated content, said author had to upload it themselves. There is a user-review section, but Andrew hasn't updated it either. There is a user review forum tho. If you want you can write reviews for it.
Andrew does log in from time to time, for maintenance I guess. Check his profile to see the last time he did so. Title: Re: Diabolik. Post by: Rev. Powell on December 15, 2017, 08:35:40 AM I've yet to see it. As far as new reviews-well,beyond reader reviews-Andrew-who was the webmaster for BAD MOVIES.ORG is long gone... :bluesad: Was he the only person who could do reviews? Did he die and no one else has access? You can write up your own reviews and put them in the "Submitted Reader Reviews" section, but yes, right now and for the foreseeable future no one else has access to put them on the "front end." I have an old review of DANGER: DAIBOLIK on my site (366 Weird Movies), but it's a serious review, not a comic review in the badmovies.org style. http://366weirdmovies.com/capsule-danger-diabolik-1968/ (http://366weirdmovies.com/capsule-danger-diabolik-1968/) I myself have only seen it in the MST3K version. It doesn't seem to be a "bad" movie, more a campy cult item. Of course, not all of Andrew's reviews were for bad movies (EL TOPO is there). Title: Re: Diabolik. Post by: Svengoolie 3 on December 15, 2017, 01:05:02 PM Hey rev, if you're into Bava did you see "planet of the vampires"? That was actually a good movie.
Title: Re: Diabolik. Post by: Rev. Powell on December 15, 2017, 02:15:08 PM Hey rev, if you're into Bava did you see "planet of the vampires"? That was actually a good movie. I have not. My Bava fave is the first one, BLACK SUNDAY. Title: Re: Diabolik. Post by: FatFreddysCat on December 17, 2017, 09:28:26 AM I enjoyed "Diabolik." It was kinda like what would happen if you gave a "Batman" villain his own movie.
Also, his girlfriend was smoooookin' hot! :D |