Badmovies.org Forum

Other Topics => Off Topic Discussion => Topic started by: ER on December 07, 2022, 08:14:48 AM



Title: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 07, 2022, 08:14:48 AM
May I break with tradition this Pearl Harbor Day and impart my condolences to the millions of Japanese people who suffered as a result of their warmongering government picking the stupidest fight in the long history of stupid fights. Governments decide and innocent people suffer. War is a terrible thing.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: Morpheus, the unwoke. on December 07, 2022, 05:17:39 PM
May I break with tradition this Pearl Harbor Day and impart my condolences to the millions of Japanese people who suffered as a result of their warmongering government picking the stupidest fight in the long history of stupid fights. Governments decide and innocent people suffer. War is a terrible thing.

A beautiful sentiment.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: indianasmith on December 07, 2022, 10:04:51 PM
Yeah, Japan's government made sure that its poor people got the worst buttwhuppin' in the history of buttwhippin's!

As an aside, I did have the chance, about 20 years ago, to have an extended conversation with a gentleman who was not only there at Pearl on that dreadful day, but had a ringside seat for the whole thing.  He was a 14 year old kid, born and raised in Honolulu, who liked to go down to the shipyard on Sunday mornings and climb up into the cockpit of this crane that was often left unlocked.  He'd eat a sandwich and watch the ships come and go, watch the sailors at their duties.  That Sundy morning he'd just climbed up into his perch when a strange looking airplane buzzed right by him - and a ship 100 yards away exploded.  Scared to climb down, he watched the entire attack unfold around him - at one point a Japanese plane flew so close that he made brief eye contact with the pilot!


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: lester1/2jr on December 08, 2022, 12:13:47 AM
"buttwhoopin" = thousands of dead children


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ralfy on December 08, 2022, 02:16:55 AM
From what I remember, it started with Japan remaining isolationalist for centuries until American "black ships" arrived and pried it open:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_Expedition

At that point Japan realized that it could no longer counter the West unless it also opened up to trade and industrialized. It did, leading to growing strength, and victory during the Battle of Tsushima:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tsushima

That terrified the West because they could never accept the fact that "orientals" could defeat them.

As the West was colonizing several parts of Asia, essentially India itself, and tried to carve up China like a turkey, it began to engage in economic blockades of Japan, prompting it to attack and occupy nearby areas, like Manchuria, to obtain more oil.

Eventually, the Great Depression led to a severe economic crash for various countries, and from which they did not recover, and that included Germany and Japan. In both countries militarism rose, and with massive support from their people, eventually leading to the debacle of WW2.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: Rev. Powell on December 08, 2022, 08:44:55 AM
I knew the US was responsible for Pearl Harbor!


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 08, 2022, 10:06:02 AM
It's Jefferson's fault!


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: lester1/2jr on December 08, 2022, 04:54:07 PM
That FDR knew in advance is just about the worst kept secret in town. If not specifically about the time of the attack then the idea that one was coming.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: LilCerberus on December 08, 2022, 06:08:30 PM
That FDR knew in advance is just about the worst kept secret in town. If not specifically about the time of the attack then the idea that one was coming.

Yes, I understand the Japanese Internment Camps opened up a week before the attack...
And I believe their were American forces fighting for the Chinese about seven months before the attack....


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 08, 2022, 07:03:52 PM
That FDR knew in advance is just about the worst kept secret in town. If not specifically about the time of the attack then the idea that one was coming.


Oh, please, an untruth repeated a million times remains an untruth.  I know you will never be swayed into thinking otherwise, but no, FDR did not knowingly allow Pearl Harbor to be bombed; it robs truth and disregards historical evidence to slander the President and many others by making this claim, which is nothing more than the fluff of conspiracy theorists and those who like to feel they possess some sensationalistic insight into the gnostic.

Allow me to thoroughly waste my time by going full-on ralfy here:

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Pearl-Harbor-and-the-back-door-to-war-theory-1688287 (https://www.britannica.com/topic/Pearl-Harbor-and-the-back-door-to-war-theory-1688287)

https://www.npr.org/2016/12/06/504449867/no-fdr-did-not-know-the-japanese-were-going-to-bomb-pearl-harbor (https://www.npr.org/2016/12/06/504449867/no-fdr-did-not-know-the-japanese-were-going-to-bomb-pearl-harbor)

https://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1847&context=br_rev (https://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1847&context=br_rev)

http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/archives/pdfs/pearlharbor.pdf (http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/archives/pdfs/pearlharbor.pdf)

https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/investigations/pearl-harbor.htm (https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/investigations/pearl-harbor.htm)







Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: indianasmith on December 08, 2022, 09:50:00 PM
I read a book several years ago, written around 1990 by the officer who was personally appointed by FDR to investigate the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
He was still alive 50 years later and wrote the book based on all of his interviews with eyewitnesses, commanders, intelligence officers, etc.
It's late and I can't remember the author or title at the moment, but I'll pull the book from my shelves at work tomorrow and list it.
He points out that America knew war with Japan was likely imminent and was expecting an attack of some sort.  They were not expecting an AIR attack because most experts believed Japan didn't have that capability yet.
But one thing that stands out was that the war department sent out a message, based on the latest decrypts, to all commanders in the Pacific - "War Warning Imminent!"
But the message was not passed on to the commanders at Pearl for over 24 hours, and by that time the attack had already come.
So, in short - we knew something was likely coming.  We didn't know what. And the base commanders were warned to be on alert.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: Morpheus, the unwoke. on December 09, 2022, 12:53:59 AM
Oh ralfy, give it a rest...


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: lester1/2jr on December 09, 2022, 01:53:31 AM
" In September, President Franklin D. Roosevelt took steps to increase the American presence in Hawaii and ordered the creation of a Hawaiian Detachment, believing a strong naval presence there would deter Japanese aggression..."

"While journalists in the United States supported the move, agreeing with FDR that it would be a deterrent to the Japanese, many naval officers, Richardson included, disagreed "

https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/fdr-bluff-relocating-us-fleet-to-pearl-harbor (https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/fdr-bluff-relocating-us-fleet-to-pearl-harbor)



Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: LilCerberus on December 09, 2022, 07:10:27 PM
On 11 December 1941, four days after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the United States declaration of war against the Japanese Empire, Nazi Germany declared war against the United States


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ralfy on December 09, 2022, 08:45:52 PM
Oh ralfy, give it a rest...

There is no logic in giving critical thinking a rest.



Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ralfy on December 09, 2022, 08:47:44 PM
I knew the US was responsible for Pearl Harbor!

Reminds me of War Plan Orange and lack of preparations in the Philippines (see books like Jose's Philippine Army: 1935-1942.

For some weird reason, reading helps. Makes me hungry, though.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: Rev. Powell on December 10, 2022, 10:44:46 AM
Oh ralfy, give it a rest...

There is no logic in giving critical thinking a rest.



While it may be always logical to indulge in critical thinking, I'm not convinced it's always logical to express the results of your critical thinking in every venue. For example, by spending a little energy in resisting the urge to respond to something I disagree with, I ultimately save a lot of energy engaging in long fruitless arguments, which I find to be the most logical choice. An off-topic thought.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 10, 2022, 11:05:33 AM
For some weird reason reading makes me hungry too. Exercise leaves me with no appetite but if I read a while I find myself hungry. Strange, huh?


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ralfy on December 11, 2022, 01:09:35 AM

While it may be always logical to indulge in critical thinking, I'm not convinced it's always logical to express the results of your critical thinking in every venue. For example, by spending a little energy in resisting the urge to respond to something I disagree with, I ultimately save a lot of energy engaging in long fruitless arguments, which I find to be the most logical choice. An off-topic thought.

The original post:

Quote
May I break with tradition this Pearl Harbor Day and impart my condolences to the millions of Japanese people who suffered as a result of their warmongering government picking the stupidest fight in the long history of stupid fights. Governments decide and innocent people suffer. War is a terrible thing.

What tradition was broken? Not to offer condolences to the Japanese people who mostly supported the same warmongering government? Why do you think the U.S. resorted to using nuclear weapons? They thought that the same people would fight to the death, and that estimated allied deaths would reach over two million if they tried to invade Japan.

The same warmongering government that emerged from an economy that fell apart because of the Great Depression? An economy that industrialized because it was pried open decades earlier, allowing its country to defeat a Western one, in turn leading to trade embargoes to contain "orientals" who were considered inferior? The same "orientals" in a region that was being pillaged by the same countries for which Japan picked "the stupidest fight in the long history of stupid fights"?

And is the same country that not only picked "the stupidest fight" but to this day has not apologized for atrocities committed on other Asians in the region? And those are the same Asians that Western imperialists were oppressing before WW2, right? From what I heard, most Japanese have been taught a sterilized version of the war.

In the end, I think the issue isn't so much indulging in critical thinking as indulging in seeing everything as if it were a professional wrestling match:

Quote
Yeah, Japan's government made sure that its poor people got the worst buttwhuppin' in the history of buttwhippin's!

If only reality was as simple as that.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ralfy on December 11, 2022, 01:20:58 AM
This is a related topic, and it comes from the documentary Fog of War:

Error 404 (Not Found)!!1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDT8NdyoWfI#)

The speaker is Robert McNamara, who used "game theory" (i.e., seeing war as a numbers game) to direct the war in Vietnam. Long before that, he did calculations for Gen. Curtis LeMay, who directed strategic bombing in the Pacific during WW2. His point has to do with the lesson that "Proportionality should be a guideline for war."

What that means is that the U.S. had to use incendiary bombs, long before they used nuclear weapons, to kill large numbers of Japanese civilians in order to kill their fighting spirit, and thus avoid tens of thousands of U.S. soldiers dying if the country had decided to invade Japan. The proof of that fighting spirit lay in kamikaze pilots, most soldiers and even civilians who saw surrender as a weakness, etc.

But what concerns McNamara is this: what are the rules of war, and what determines that? His last point is telling: had the U.S. lost the war, then LeMay and McNamara would have been accused of behaving as war criminals. The implication is that what one does is immoral only if one loses.



Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 11, 2022, 10:29:28 AM
When I mentioned a break with tradition, ralfy, it was a break with my own tradition of how I have usually marked Pearl Harbor Day in the fifteen years I've been here. One of the luxuries of peace is being able to cast a kind thought toward those who were once labeled as enemies, and in mentioning that most people in a population do not start wars, only suffer from them, I don't think I was wrong. It's a shame you disagree, as I did not take you for one who advocated eternal vindictiveness.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 11, 2022, 03:00:31 PM
PS Unless you've served in some capacity, ralfy, how about you shut your flapping mouth over things you know nothing about but which you happily set yourself up as an authority on?

An academic trying to correct a veteran like Indy, who was actually stationed in Japan, is like a virgin giving sex advice.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: lester1/2jr on December 11, 2022, 03:41:50 PM
Ralfy is an "academic"?


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 11, 2022, 06:24:21 PM
Ralfy is an "academic"?

Yes, he said he had that honor in one of his posts in the Crazy SOB thread.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: LilCerberus on December 11, 2022, 06:54:54 PM
And on this particular day in history, Hitler followed suit & declared war on the US for no reason, Despite the number of Nazi sympathizers here...


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 11, 2022, 08:22:36 PM
And on this particular day in history, Hitler followed suit & declared war on the US for no reason, Despite the number of Nazi sympathizers here...
Stupidest decision in Hitler's long chain of stupid decisions. Stupider than June 22, 1941.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: LilCerberus on December 11, 2022, 08:31:41 PM
And on this particular day in history, Hitler followed suit & declared war on the US for no reason, Despite the number of Nazi sympathizers here...
Stupidest decision in Hitler's long chain of stupid decisions. Stupider than June 22, 1941.
Indeed, it was.....


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ralfy on December 12, 2022, 12:35:45 AM
When I mentioned a break with tradition, ralfy, it was a break with my own tradition of how I have usually marked Pearl Harbor Day in the fifteen years I've been here. One of the luxuries of peace is being able to cast a kind thought toward those who were once labeled as enemies, and in mentioning that most people in a population do not start wars, only suffer from them, I don't think I was wrong. It's a shame you disagree, as I did not take you for one who advocated eternal vindictiveness.

My understanding is that Japanese vets have been invited to Pearl Harbor for years, so I don't understand how friendship between Japan and the U.S. is new to you.

About the Japanese people fooled by their government, keep in mind that the Japanese stopped fighting only because the Emperor told them to do so. That's why the U.S. had to use nuclear weapons, as "buttwhuppin'" them with incendiary bombs wasn't good enough. From what I remember, the allies estimated that two million of their boys would die if they tried to invade the Japanese mainland.

Later, the U.S. worked with Japan, intending it to be a bulwark against the Iron Curtain. Surprisingly, the source from that is our good friend Kennan, who argued in one State Dept. memo that the Philippines, probably the only true ally the U.S. ever had in that region, would be a provider of raw materials needed to rebuild the Japanese economy. I don't think you should know about what the U.S. did to the Philippines before and after.

To this day, Japan refuses to apologize even for the "comfort women" its soldiers abused during the war. In high schools in Japan, a more sterilized version of the war is given, and far removed from what kids are taught in South Korea and China.

Finally, I don't disagree with what you wrote. Rather, I mentioned why the Japanese government became warmongering, and the context of that tradition.



Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ralfy on December 12, 2022, 12:45:22 AM
PS Unless you've served in some capacity, ralfy, how about you shut your flapping mouth over things you know nothing about but which you happily set yourself up as an authority on?

An academic trying to correct a veteran like Indy, who was actually stationed in Japan, is like a virgin giving sex advice.

Served in the military, like you?

If you think I know nothing about this issue, then let me know why.

Wait a minute: you were referring to Indy? You wanted to share "a kind thought," and his? "Yeah, Japan's government made sure that its poor people got the worst buttwhuppin' in the history of buttwhippin's!"

This forum operates based on anonymity, right? That means biodatas and anecdotes can't be proven. Ironically, that even includes my being an academic.

In which case, the best thing you can do is to react to the arguments that I raised instead of engaging in personal attacks.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ralfy on December 12, 2022, 12:53:11 AM
And on this particular day in history, Hitler followed suit & declared war on the US for no reason, Despite the number of Nazi sympathizers here...

Actually, there are reasons, and you will find them very surprising.

About Nazi sympathizers, I found this very interesting point from, of all places, the liberal magazine The Atlantic:

"What America Taught the Nazis"

Quote
In the 1930s, the Germans were fascinated by the global leader in codified racism—the United States.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/11/what-america-taught-the-nazis/540630/ (https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/11/what-america-taught-the-nazis/540630/)

Ross did a follow-up later for The New Yorker:

"How American Racism Influenced Hitler"

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/04/30/how-american-racism-influenced-hitler (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/04/30/how-american-racism-influenced-hitler)

Quote
American eugenicists made no secret of their racist objectives, and their views were prevalent enough that F. Scott Fitzgerald featured them in “The Great Gatsby.” (The cloddish Tom Buchanan, having evidently read Lothrop Stoddard’s 1920 tract “The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy,” says, “The idea is if we don’t look out the white race will be—will be utterly submerged.”) California’s sterilization program directly inspired the Nazi sterilization law of 1934. There are also sinister, if mostly coincidental, similarities between American and German technologies of death. In 1924, the first execution by gas chamber took place, in Nevada. In a history of the American gas chamber, Scott Christianson states that the fumigating agent Zyklon-B, which was licensed to American Cyanamid by the German company I. G. Farben, was considered as a lethal agent but found to be impractical. Zyklon-B was, however, used to disinfect immigrants as they crossed the border at El Paso—a practice that did not go unnoticed by Gerhard Peters, the chemist who supplied a modified version of Zyklon-B to Auschwitz. Later, American gas chambers were outfitted with a chute down which poison pellets were dropped. Earl Liston, the inventor of the device, explained, “Pulling a lever to kill a man is hard work. Pouring acid down a tube is easier on the nerves, more like watering flowers.” Much the same method was introduced at Auschwitz, to relieve stress on S.S. guards.

When Hitler praised American restrictions on naturalization, he had in mind the Immigration Act of 1924, which imposed national quotas and barred most Asian people altogether. For Nazi observers, this was evidence that America was evolving in the right direction, despite its specious rhetoric about equality. The Immigration Act, too, played a facilitating role in the Holocaust, because the quotas prevented thousands of Jews, including Anne Frank and her family, from reaching America. In 1938, President Roosevelt called for an international conference on the plight of European refugees; this was held in Évian-les-Bains, France, but no substantive change resulted. The German Foreign Office, in a sardonic reply, found it “astounding” that other countries would decry Germany’s treatment of Jews and then decline to admit them.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 12, 2022, 10:22:33 AM
Anyone else with me on letting this thread and the one about Putin dry up and die before we are all crushed under the weight of armchair know it all-ism?


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: LilCerberus on December 12, 2022, 12:26:29 PM
Anyone else with me on letting this thread and the one about Putin dry up and die before we are all crushed under the weight of armchair know it all-ism?
Yes.
And I've already met a guy who wrote a book about how Hitler was copying Roosevelt, which is why I didn't bring it up....


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: lester1/2jr on December 13, 2022, 01:43:06 AM
I don't think people with military experience have any more or less understanding of the geopolitical implications of foreign policy decisions.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: Alex on December 13, 2022, 02:04:45 AM
Of course not. We only live and die by those decisions. Why would we learn any greater understanding of them than anyone else? All that time and effort they put into giving us additional information the general public doesn't get to see, is totally wasted. That part of the job interview, where you get quizzed on a variety of world events at random and have to answer, dump that s**t. The selection boards where you have to write a degree-level paper on a randomly chosen geopolitical event and then defend it with only a few week's prep? No need for that when the average person understands just as much as you. Might as well just hand out those rank tabs in a cereal box.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 13, 2022, 08:50:44 AM
I don't think people with military experience have any more or less understanding of the geopolitical implications of foreign policy decisions.

Completely disagree.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: lester1/2jr on December 13, 2022, 04:56:49 PM
it's a subjective thing. I don't now anything about how say, the war in Iraq worked, but I know it was not a good idea.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 13, 2022, 05:18:21 PM
I guess it shouldn't surprise me but still somehow does, that a post meant to express sympathy for the suffering of innocent people on the other side during a war fought eighty years ago has generated controversy.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ralfy on December 13, 2022, 07:18:32 PM
I think the problem isn't know-it-all-ism but a blinkered view of history. Hence, the mistaken belief that the Japanese were generally innocent (i.e., did not support the war), were merely forced by a warmongering government, that the latter was warmongering for no reason at all, etc.

The reality is that they backed the Emperor even outside a military government and were willing to die for him and for their country, and that they accepted surrender only because he ordered them to do so, and that to this day many of them know little about the war in contrast to those who were victimized by it.

But does that mean that the Japanese were merely evil, and that allies were good? Yes, but only if one subscribes to the reductive view that there's only good and evil, and we're good while they're evil. That's why in contrast to that, the same U.S. did not take punitive action on the Emperor, and supported Japan to develop its economy. Forgiveness of Japan took place a lot earlier than most imagine, while Japanese are barely taught about atrocities committed during the war.

The same blinkered view can be seen in light of views of the attack on Iraq. It's similar to Clinton's view of Qaddafi: we came, we saw, he died.

Error 404 (Not Found)!!1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DXDU48RHLU#)

or Bush's jokes about WMDs. Nope, no weapons over there!

Error 404 (Not Found)!!1 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCTfEf6Rrmw#)

Mostly silence, though, when it comes to explaining how Saddam maintained power:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2003/9/4/when-rumsfeld-was-chummy-with-saddam (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2003/9/4/when-rumsfeld-was-chummy-with-saddam)



Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 13, 2022, 08:51:01 PM
I think the problem isn't know-it-all-ism but a blinkered view of history. Hence, the mistaken belief that the Japanese were generally innocent (i.e., did not support the war), were merely forced by a warmongering government, that the latter was warmongering for no reason at all, etc


Can you show me where anyone here has indicated that outlook? I think you are so determined to tell your self-important opinions and what you think you know, that you seize on anything resembling an excuse, then squeal with delight to have emptied out your thoughts even when nothing justified you giving them. If you think innocent people do not suffer as a result of government's actions (which is what my original post was about) I invite you to rise from your armchair and visit a war-torn country. It might be fatal to your pre-conceived ideas of reality. Been there, done that, it changed me. Try it. It's humbling. In the meantime, just give it a bit of a rest, mate, OK?


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 13, 2022, 08:57:13 PM
On second thought, why am I even still reading your posts and replying? Talk to yourself. (Your style would probably be better appreciated somewhere else, and I hope you find it. You're not a jerk, just mildly annoying in your adolescent certainty you know something.)


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: lester1/2jr on December 14, 2022, 01:09:30 AM
bottom line: nagasaki and hiroshima were terrorism: inflicting damage on the population in order to affect the governments policy.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: Alex on December 14, 2022, 08:17:07 AM
Interesting. In one post you claim it is subjective, and then in the next, you post absolutes.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 14, 2022, 11:09:59 AM
Tell you what, let's all watch Grave of the Fireflies and call this strife-infected thread kaput, d'ya'wanna?


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: lester1/2jr on December 14, 2022, 05:05:32 PM
unless there's another definition of terrorism besides that one?


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: Alex on December 14, 2022, 05:09:30 PM
I guess it isn't subjective then.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ralfy on December 14, 2022, 09:30:27 PM

Can you show me where anyone here has indicated that outlook? I think you are so determined to tell your self-important opinions and what you think you know, that you seize on anything resembling an excuse, then squeal with delight to have emptied out your thoughts even when nothing justified you giving them. If you think innocent people do not suffer as a result of government's actions (which is what my original post was about) I invite you to rise from your armchair and visit a war-torn country. It might be fatal to your pre-conceived ideas of reality. Been there, done that, it changed me. Try it. It's humbling. In the meantime, just give it a bit of a rest, mate, OK?

It came from several history books, including Agoncillo's Fateful Years and the documentary I just mentioned earlier.

About self-importance, etc., aren't you the one who created this thread and shared the following pronouncement?

Quote
May I break with tradition this Pearl Harbor Day and impart my condolences to the millions of Japanese people who suffered as a result of their warmongering government picking the stupidest fight in the long history of stupid fights. Governments decide and innocent people suffer. War is a terrible thing.

The ff. addresses that and other points you raised in your recent post:

Where did you get the idea that the Japanese people were generally "innocent," that they were coerced by a warmongering government, that that government became warmongering for no reason at all and decided to "[pick] the stupidest fight" without considering the repercussions of such, and that you're even breaking with tradition?

The U.S. has been friends with Japan from the start! Why do you think they didn't punish the Emperor?

The Japanese people mostly supported the war and were even willing to die for the Emperor. That's why the U.S. had to use the atomic bomb because it turned out that incendiary bombing wasn't enough, and they were anticipating two million allies dead if they tried to invade Japan. But the Emperor had to speak up (and it was the first time that the Japanese heard him, not just during the war but throughout Japanese history) to stop them from fighting. Even then, he couldn't even just the word "surrender"!

About that "stupidest fight," that stemmed from Japan's calculated risk of preventing the U.S. from using its aircraft carriers to counter the former's sweep of Southeast Asia to take down British colonizers. But even with failure to ensure that plus significant disadvantages, Japan managed to hold on. What's not mentioned in that break from tradition is that to this day the Japanese barely know about the war, especially atrocities that they committed, while South Koreans and Chinese know them all-too-well.

Why the need to control resources in SE Asia? Raw materials needed for its industries was lacking due to effects of the Great Depression, and cold relations with the West due to Japan's victory over Russia didn't help.

One more thing: why do you keep asking forum members about their background when this forum doesn't require ID verification and thus any references to such can't be proven?



Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ralfy on December 14, 2022, 09:32:21 PM
On second thought, why am I even still reading your posts and replying? Talk to yourself. (Your style would probably be better appreciated somewhere else, and I hope you find it. You're not a jerk, just mildly annoying in your adolescent certainty you know something.)

Why "adolescent certainty"?


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ralfy on December 14, 2022, 09:35:16 PM
From what I remember, the U.S. government believed that the Japanese people would continue fighting, and that in order to stop them the U.S. would have to invade Japan. They estimated allied casualties at around two million, and to prevent that decided to use the bomb.


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: lester1/2jr on December 15, 2022, 01:51:57 AM
Or they could have not invaded Japan OR dropped the bomb


Title: Re: This Pearl Harbor Day
Post by: ER on December 15, 2022, 08:40:12 AM
Cigarette? Blindfold?