|
Title: Howling III Post by: Andrew on October 27, 2003, 09:59:22 PM Happy Halloween everyone (a few days early, but scheduling, etc.).
You know, this review started running on and I cut it short. However, there was still a horde of idiocy to point out. Everything from the burnt werewolf skeleton attacking the one guy, to the terrible awards ceremony scene. Ugly, badly trained little movie. I look forward to it collecting dust. http://www.badmovies.org/movies/howlingiii/ Title: Re: Howling III Post by: wuggles451 on October 27, 2003, 10:46:32 PM I saw this rotting in the Wal Mart $5.88 bin I almost picked it up, but grabbed Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell instead. Now I'm curious as to how bad it really is. O yeah and good review
Post Edited (10-27-03 21:47) Title: Re: Howling III Post by: JohnL on October 27, 2003, 11:05:34 PM Although I agree that the movie stinks, Jerboa always appealed to me, furry stomach and all. I know, I need help... :)
Title: Re: Howling III Post by: Cullen on October 27, 2003, 11:51:02 PM Out of morbid curiousity, how does Howling III compare with Howling II?
Title: Re: Howling III Post by: daveblackeye15 on October 28, 2003, 12:08:49 AM YEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!! HOWLING III ALRIGHT WOOOOOOOO!!!! I saw the end of this (the point where they burn the guy who later attacks the army guys are a skelton, to the very end) and I was freaked out! I was shakeing all over the place because of it and I had fun. That was back when they had "Monster Vision" on TNT with Joe Bob Briggs (ahh the good old days) but I REALLY doubt that this movie will be as much fun as the first time I saw it.
P.S. you cut the review short....awww maaan. -the first rule of fat club- Title: ALL the HOWLING "sequels" sucked, except for... Post by: kriegerg69 on October 28, 2003, 01:53:55 AM HOWLING VI: THE FREAKS. I really liked that one more than any of the so-called "sequels", because it was a nifty takeoff on FREAKS (1932), and had the added horror of vampires thrown into it.
Title: Re: Howling III Post by: JohnL on October 28, 2003, 06:49:24 PM >Out of morbid curiousity, how does Howling III compare with Howling II?
It's hard to compare them, since they're very different movies. Personally, I never liked Howling II. Title: Proof I am going senile Post by: Cullen on October 28, 2003, 10:15:52 PM Cullen (duh) wrote:
> Out of morbid curiousity, how does Howling III compare > with Howling II? I thought this question was familiar. I asked it the last time (http://www.badmovies.org/bbs/read.php?f=2&i=41181&t=41169) Howling III was mentioned. I'll bet, if I go through all of my posts, I find that I'm just saying the same things over and over again, each time thinking I'm saying something new. I'm such a moron. (I love the edit feature. It's very, very good to me.) Post Edited (10-29-03 01:15) Title: Re: Howling III Post by: akiratubo on October 28, 2003, 11:11:43 PM I have never been able to finish this movie. It starts out all right but quickly grows unimaginably boring.
Title: Re: Howling III Post by: Flangepart on October 30, 2003, 11:50:02 AM Joe Bob Briggs almost made me watch this one.....Almost.
But, even HE could not pull me through it....There just wern't enough "FU" |