Badmovies.org Forum

Movies => Bad Movies => Topic started by: trekgeezer on December 20, 2003, 01:16:24 PM



Title: Big Budget Bad Movie of the Year
Post by: trekgeezer on December 20, 2003, 01:16:24 PM
The worst one I saw this year was League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.  Which would you nominate?



Title: Re: Big Budget Bad Movie of the Year
Post by: Ash on December 20, 2003, 08:14:39 PM
I agree 100% on League of Extraordinary Gentleman...


Title: Re: Big Budget Bad Movie of the Year
Post by: Scott on December 20, 2003, 08:54:08 PM
I didn't see it, but I heard THE HULK wasn't very good. Not sure if it cost alot.



Title: Re: Big Budget Bad Movie of the Year
Post by: trekgeezer on December 20, 2003, 10:50:14 PM
I really kinda liked  The Hulk. I think a lot of people didn't  because it was Ang Lee's version. Some of it is pretty cool.



Title: Re: Big Budget Bad Movie of the Year
Post by: Neon Noodle on December 20, 2003, 10:59:45 PM
Gigli was atrocious. Even though I prefer the superhero Daredevil to the Hulk, I think the Hulk was a superior movie.



Title: Re: Big Budget Bad Movie of the Year
Post by: I luv dolma on December 21, 2003, 12:42:12 AM
I haven't seen Cat in the Hat, but I know it sucks. It already made the low ratings chart at imdb.com, and plus the budget of the film was around 90 million. Sadly, the film has already taken in more then it cost to make the film. It was risky, but they made it...some how.


Title: Re: Big Budget Bad Movie of the Year
Post by: jmc on December 21, 2003, 04:39:21 AM
I was looking at the numbers on CAT and it sounds like they've barely broken even.  It'll make a profit, but probably not as much as they were hoping.  Trouble is, after merchandising, foreign receipts and home video, most movies end up making a decent profit.  

I've avoided most of the big budget stuff this year.    I'd say probably CAT IN THE HAT just because the whole idea of the movie is repulsive...turning a classic children's book into 90 minutes of merchandising.


Title: Re: Big Budget Bad Movie of the Year
Post by: daveblackeye15 on December 21, 2003, 03:09:29 PM
*ahem* I uh..*ahem* don't , please don't flame me for this but ..I actually enjoyed watching "League of Extraordinary Gentlemen" my brother saw it with me and we both liked it , maybe I set my expetations SO low that I found the movie fun. But I asked for the comic book for christmas just so I could see what they changed, (don't hurt me.) (Runs away)

Anyway I'd vote for "Cat in the Hat".



Title: No Flaming
Post by: trekgeezer on December 21, 2003, 03:59:30 PM
I'm not going to flame you.  There were actually some good parts in it.  It was just one of those movies for me that had something missing.  To my understanding  it 's nothing like the comic. Dorian Gray was added and the Tom Sawyer character was put in just to have an American.

I think one problem  with it was that Sean Connery was in the editing room making sure he was in just about every scene. There was a rumor that he and the director had almost  come to physical blows on the set.

I guess I was just really disappointed by it. I kinda like the whole 'steam punk' aspect of  stories like this, making versions of modern devices from antique materials and power sources.



Title: Re: No Flaming
Post by: daveblackeye15 on December 21, 2003, 06:45:16 PM
Yeah I know they added Tom Sawyer in just to have a American in it (no big loss) and I know Dorian Gray was another add in (no big loss there either) but I'm a little excited to see what the comic is like, I've heard it's really good.



Title: Re: Big Budget Bad Movie of the Year
Post by: yaddo42 on December 22, 2003, 03:44:40 PM
I been wanting to see LXG just to see how bad it is compared to the comic series, and I skipped it in the theaters. The only movie critic I heard of who really liked it is the entertainment editor in my local newspaper, and after years of reading the guy's stuff I've figured out he has no taste. Even his attempts at appreciating bad and cult movies is tame and very lame.

The scary thing is that I've been to Hollywood Video twice since LXG came out on video, including on the release date. All their copies on DVD and VHS were checked out. Even stuff like "Seabiscuit" and other recent releases of big movies weren't that hard to come by.


Title: Re: Big Budget Bad Movie of the Year
Post by: eve666 on December 22, 2003, 08:19:45 PM
Maybe some of you enjoyed it but I saw this movie and I thougth it was bad
I'm talikng about Bad Boys II. I love Will Smilth and Martin Lawrence, and I admired the fact that they did not do BOOTY- VIOLENCE-SEX movies. the first Bad Boys is my favorite movie ever, it has just the rigth amount of violence and cussing. Needledd to say I was anxiosly awaiting a part II. What a great big disapointment.
It was trash....they gave in to the masses. There was an excruciating amount of profanity, needless nudity and over the top non-sense violence. I for one am very disapointed in Mr. Smith and Mr Lawrence.


Title: Bad Boys 2
Post by: Ash on December 22, 2003, 09:43:06 PM
I haven't seen it and I don't want to.

I didn't particularly care for the first film to begin with.

I like Ebert's final opinion of Bad Boys 2 best of all...here it is:  

"There was once a time when a hero would sacrifice his own life rather than injure innocent bystanders. No longer. The heroes of "Bad Boys II" are egotistical monsters, concerned only with their power, their one-liners, their weapons, their cars, their desires. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that characters who wipe out a village can also make cruel jokes at the expense of a kid on his first date. Everybody involved in this project needs to do some community service."



Post Edited (12-22-03 20:44)


Title: I second that nomination for BAD BOYS 2
Post by: Chris K. on December 22, 2003, 10:00:56 PM
Sorry, but whose idea was it to let Michael Bay go behind a 35mm Panavision camera in the first place? Sorry Michael Bay, but BAD BOYS 2 is about as worse as ARMAGEDDON or PEARL HARBOR, and that is saying something.

I also nominate THE CAT IN THE HAT and (drumroll) GIGLI.


Title: Re: Big Budget Bad Movie of the Year
Post by: Neon Noodle on December 23, 2003, 09:44:14 PM
Maybe it's just me, but LXG sounded so much like THE SPECIALS that I couldn't bring myself to see it.

Perhaps on rental night, I may take the dare.....



Title: Re: the matrix reloded
Post by: Tuck (Nowt to do with Tucker) on December 28, 2003, 03:58:19 PM
what a piece of s**t.
I enjoyed the first one but didn't really go ape s**t over it and predictably the sequel was a display of special effects that were interesting the first time.
that kentucky fried chicken guy nailed it for me i didn't even weatch the rest of it!


Title: Re: the matrix reloded
Post by: Grumpy Guy on December 29, 2003, 07:04:35 AM
Tuck (Nowt to do with Tucker) wrote:

> what a piece of s**t.
> I enjoyed the first one but didn't really go ape s**t over it
> and predictably the sequel was a display of special effects
> that were interesting the first time.
> that kentucky fried chicken guy nailed it for me i didn't even
> weatch the rest of it!

Such language.  And, just as a question - how the heck do you misspell a login name?  Or did you mean to have the...ahem..."word" Nowt in your name?

In any case, I vote for Cat in the Hat, with special honors for LXG because no one involved seems able to spell "exraordinary".  They seem convinced that it begins with an X.  Huh.  Weird.

My big problem with LXG was not that it didn't follow the comic.  It was not the added characters (I actually thought Dorian Gray was pretty cool).  It was the gi-flippin'-gantic submarine in the canals of Venice, most of which are less than ten feet deep.

And, for the record, I liked the Hulk movie, although I definately saw room for improvement.



Title: Re: Bad boys 2 not so bad
Post by: dean on December 29, 2003, 07:40:44 AM

I actually liked Bad Boys 2.  It's been one of the better movies I've seen all year.  Though the overuse of zoom was incredibly annoying [I was sitting in the front row of a packed theatre] so my neck got a little sore from all the shakiness but that was about all that annoyed me about this film, just a bit of fun really.

A film that I thought was pretty bad though was 'Wrong Turn' with Eliza Dushku.  As a horror film it was pretty bad.  It's two saving graces were:  1.  Some fairly gruesome bits that were done pretty well.  2.  The evil laughing hillbilly.  He made it funny, and made me annoy the other movie watchers because I laughed too much at the absurdity of some of this film,


Title: Re: Bad boys 2 not so bad
Post by: raj on December 29, 2003, 11:19:21 AM
I got a headache just from the previews for it while waiting for Matrix Reloaded.  Either that or Fast Furious 2.  Or maybe both.


Title: Re: No Flaming
Post by: raj on December 29, 2003, 11:20:59 AM
From what I understand of the movie/comics, Jack the Ripper is in it as a good guy.  Jack the Ripper????


Title: Re: Big Budget Bad Movie of the Year
Post by: Alex on December 29, 2003, 11:33:05 AM
I found Tomb Raider 2 amazingly boring. Very well made, but the kind of movie where you come out of the cinema with the feeling 'now that was a complete waste of time'. Angelina Jolie notwithstanding.