The worst of the worst. No, not "Manos".

[Scott]

THE CORPSE GRINDERS is a poor film because of the look and acting, but the whole concept of a corpse grinder is hard to pass up. It should be remade with better production values. 

[zombiedudeman]

A lot of Sub Rosa movies are pain to me. Also Chris Seaver movies, he directed Filthy McNasty and Mulva Zombie Ass Kicker, ugh. I tend to not vehmently hate movies as long as they can hold my attention, even if they're so utterly stupid (like Popeye, sucked but I was able sit through it). What makes a movie horrible for me is the tedious boredem combined with looking like half-assed trash. Sub Rosa and Chris Seaver movies are poorly written, nonsensical stories that bore me to tears! Being camcorder movies with amatures that can't act makes it all worse.  I can never sit through them but I keep them just for my personal "museum of Stupidity" where I exhibit the most stupid things I ever crossed in my life.

I have that Corpse Grinder film by the way, haven't got to popping it in yet, I think I'll do it tonight to see if it's worthy of my "museum" haha.

[Doc Daneeka]

You people just don't take the worst modern films into enough consideration! The worst for me are Dracula 3000 (in a good way) and Scarecrow Slayer (in a bad way)

[Torgo]

I saw a David Carradine movie a while back entitled Evil Toons.

I could only make it 20 minutes into the movie as it was that bad.

[KYGOTC]

Whta?! Evil ToonS was a barrel o laughs! i dug it, mon.

[Yaddo 42]

Evil Toons isn't even in the ballpark of badness. The story is a little dull (it's a Fred Olen Ray movie not Shakespeare), the title is a scam since there's maybe one animated sequence - badly and cheaply done, and only one Toon; but it could be a lot worse. You get to see some familiar names (Carradine, Dick Miller, Arte Johnson) toughing it out for a paycheck, some good soft-core nekkidness (Michelle Bauer shows up only long enough to get topless), and a few cheap laughs and in-jokes.

Dracula 3000 is worth a look for the laughs of trying to sandwich in connections to the source material and the attempts to be all "future-ish" (I can see them explaining it that way) with religion being forgotten or outlawed. Also the characters (or screenwriters) mixing up a cross and a crucifix, and the pure artistic talent in any medium that is Coolio!

[KYGOTC]

oH, wait. Im thinking of a different movie. I havent seen "Evil Toons". I was thinking of something else.

[Doc Daneeka]

Terror Toons right?

[KYGOTC]

Yes, thats the one Im thinking of. Thank yew Senior Briggs.

[Yaddo 42]

I was going to guess that film but for some reason I thought it was called "Killer Toonz".

[peter johnson]

This sort of raises an interesting issue, as in how long does a certain actor have to appear onscreen before you call it an "Actor X" movie?
John Neville is the protagonist in "The Adventures of Baron Munchausen" -- Robin Williams is barely onscreen at all as the (unbilled -- Williams even used a false name in the end-credits) King of The Moon.  If someone does a walk-on cameo like that, can we still call it "their" movie?
Hell, if you look at IMDB, there are at least 2 dozen other actors & actresses that have more screen-time in it than Williams -- Why not call it an "Uma Thurman" movie?
peter johnson'/denny crane

[Scott]

I mentioned THE BARON OF MUNCHAUSEN, but also felt that the movie wasn't good because of him. He just happen to be in it.

[Yaddo 42]

It's probably prescence, rather than screen time, that makes a film an "Actor X" film. A notable scene, a showy role, memorable scene chewing, etc. Whoever puts their stamp on the film in the audience's mind.

William's cameo got a lot of attention at the time, and still gets it when people mention the film now. But to me it's a Terry Gilliam film and not really any of the actors in it. I see how his part serves as an example of what a lot of people hate about Williams, me included, but he has many more roles in film he actually starred in to serve as examples.

But I like TAOBM as a film itself, not perfect but a minor favorite.

[Doc Daneeka]

Also see Little Shop of Horrors (original) and Dr. Strangelove

[RCMerchant]

I remember a movie called BEAST of MORROCCO (aka HAND of NIGHT) from Creature Feature when I was a kid. Confusing...boring...blah.I DISMEMBER MAMA (1972):No dismembering! Boring yawnfest! Good title,though.More:
THREE on a MEAT HOOK(1973) Leave it to William (ASYLUM of SATAN) Girdler to f*ck up a movie based on Ed Gein.
STAR TREK(1979) How,in the name of all thats possible,can you screw up a movie with all the original cast, a HUGE budget,and direction by Robert (the HAUNTING) Wise!?!? Watch and yawn.
KING KONG(1976) DAMMIT!!!I STILL hold a grudge for paying $1.50 at the theatre to see DeLaurentis casterated version of one of my favorite movies of all time!
a