Bad Movie Logo
"A website to the detriment of good film"
Custom Search
HOMEB-MOVIE REVIEWSREADER REVIEWSFORUMINTERVIEWSUPDATESABOUT
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 07:52:44 PM
713372 Posts in 53058 Topics by 7725 Members
Latest Member: wibwao
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Other Topics  |  Off Topic Discussion  |  STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS  (Read 9897 times)
CheezeFlixz
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 496
Posts: 3747


Pathetic Earthlings


WWW
« Reply #15 on: January 30, 2008, 02:00:54 AM »

Indiana, as you know most of the time we are on the same political page. However, as far as term limits go I feel that todays politicians have become to self serving and rarely have the best interest of their constituents at heart. Case in point, a number of our collective fine members of congress were dismayed and some verbally upset when the populous spoke out against the amnesty bill. One congressmen in Ohio even said something to the effect "I don't care what these people want, I know what's best for them." and he wasn't the only one with similar statements.
 To many of these yahoos have forgotten just who they work for and act if they are members of the super elite and not the public servants in which they are, in short many of them need to be brought down a few notches. My Rep Mitch McConnell is one, Harry Reed, Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, Trent Lott and dare I say John McCain are others. I'm sick of all of them spending like drunken sailors and sticking their hand in my pocket like it's a bottomless pit. We have gotten so far away from what the founding fathers had in mind it's scary.
Earmark spending, pork barrel programs and hand out on a grand scale. I don't believe in entitlements ... you are entitled to get an education, get a job, get to up off your butt and pay taxes like the rest of us and get the hell out of my pocket. If I can't claim you on my taxes I damn sure don't want to support you! (I exclude from these statement the elderly and infirm. I have a tiny grain of compassion.)
These buttheads in Washington who have never had to meet a payroll where they couldn't just print more money as needed, never had to work for a raise, just vote another one in as needed, never had to deal with the insane rules and reg they inflict on businesses and then stand there wondering why jobs are moving out of the country. They are out of touch and they are not the men and women of yesteryear. If term limits are a bad idea then why does the president have one?

The biggest problem we face in the country is citizen ignorance and apathy, I've talked to so many people that either don't care or don't know the any facts about anything in the presidential race. Some don't even know who is running .. it's scary really and it's sad when 30% of the registered voter polling is considered heavy turn out.

Ok someone else take the soapbox before I really go off ... 
Logged

dean
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 267
Posts: 3635



« Reply #16 on: January 30, 2008, 03:32:36 AM »

Clean house.  There's a campaign slogan I can sink my teeth into.

I've thought if having bumper stickers printed to that effect. Either that or another classic, "Throw the bums out!"

A while back, one of the fringe parties had the slogan 'Keep the Bastards Honest'.  They were a minor party, but the third largest in the country, so a good check on the other two.  Unfortunately they seem to have imploded of late, and barely rate a mention...

Not that I was a fan of the party, but I did think having someone lurking in the corner, ready to pounce if any of the others drop the ball was a good way to ensure the two major parties at least stayed on course, if only a little...
Logged

------------The password will be: Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch
indianasmith
Archeologist, Theologian, Elder Scrolls Addict, and a
B-Movie Kraken
*****

Karma: 2591
Posts: 15182


A good bad movie is like popcorn for the soul!


« Reply #17 on: January 30, 2008, 07:28:03 AM »

Ulthar -

an America divided into two countries would have been so pre-occupied with "going another round" of North versus South that I don't see the country re-uniting.  European powers would have courted the two sections separately - the French and British most likely sticking with the Confederates, their cotton suppliers.  The newborn German Empire would have probably responded by reaching out to the Northern States, and if those friendships cemented into alliances, World War I would have ravaged America as well as Europe.  Certainly America would not have been in a position to save Europe from itself.  And while the Confederacy would have almost certainly abolished slavery eventually, the treatment and social status of blacks would have been even worse in that timeline than it was in ours.

Short version, the right side won.
Logged

"I shall smite you in the nostrils with a rod of iron, and wax your spleen with Efferdent!!"
Derf
Crazy Rabbity Thingy
Proofreader
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 429
Posts: 2564


Lagomorphs: menace or underutilized resource?


« Reply #18 on: January 30, 2008, 08:36:13 AM »

I don't often get into political discussions, and for good reason: I see things from too many different sides and usually end up arguing with myself. I can in at least one respect agree with indianasmith's view about Bush--he (Bush) seems like a decent, average guy doing the best he can. I don't think Bush is necessarily the problem; I personally think the bigger problem has been the people he has around him (**coughCheneycough**) who are much more politically savvy than he is and who heavily influence him. Yes, Bush is ultimately responsible, but it would seem that this administration has let the VP run the country while the Prez takes the heat.

As for term limits, I don't have as strong an opinion as CheezeFlix. I do think it is definitely time to clean House (& Senate). One of the funniest things I have heard in any campaign was Ted Kennedy coming out in support of Obama, claiming that we need a change of leadership. Yeah, Teddy, we do; step down and let someone take your place, hmm? I think an alternative to term limits that would have much of the same effect (at least in the government spending department) would be legislation that would prevent lawmakers from adding anything to a bill that is not directly related to the main subject of the bill. In other words, if you are presenting a bill to build a new interstate highway, you can't sneak in there a clause that would shunt millions of dollars to your constituency to build a new court house. Or even one to improve the roads in your home state. That would prevent much of the porkbarrel spending that goes on today, thereby also making it unnecessary for a president to veto good legislation because it is so bogged down with add-ons. I guess this idea is similar to the line-item veto, but coming at it from the other side.
Logged

"They tap dance not, neither do they fart." --Greensleeves, on the Fig Men of the Imagination, in "Twice Upon a Time."
ulthar
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 368
Posts: 4168


I AM serious, and stop calling me Shirley


WWW
« Reply #19 on: January 30, 2008, 10:07:26 AM »

Ulthar -

an America divided into two countries would have been so pre-occupied with "going another round" of North versus South that I don't see the country re-uniting.  European powers would have courted the two sections separately - the French and British most likely sticking with the Confederates, their cotton suppliers.  The newborn German Empire would have probably responded by reaching out to the Northern States, and if those friendships cemented into alliances, World War I would have ravaged America as well as Europe.  Certainly America would not have been in a position to save Europe from itself.  And while the Confederacy would have almost certainly abolished slavery eventually, the treatment and social status of blacks would have been even worse in that timeline than it was in ours.


I think the handwriting was on the wall - slavery was on it's way out, and with it, the South's economy.  I'm not sure England and France would have wanted the bail the South out to the degree it would have been needed;  you may be right.  I think the "second phase" of the war would have been purely economic.

It is the nature of Southern culture to avoid, at almost all costs, outsiders 'ruling' the local boys.  The Scotch, Irish and Scotch-Irish influences in the South are strong, very strong.  This culture plays a BIG part of why I would suggest "help" from the British and French may not have been as influential as you assert. 

That said, the Irish don't have that great a history of governing themselves. There has always been a TON of infighting in Ireland.  The stereotype of "fighting Irish" is not unfounded.  So, I doubt the Southern Culture would have allowed much stability in the Confederate States (the war unified them to a degree in a cause...once that group dynamic is gone, the internal fighting can begin).

So, my speculation is that in the period after the Civil War, say about 50 years or so (let's use WWI as a boundary, which would be a good "trigger" for reunification), the South would become what we now call a Third World country - poor economy,  unstable leadership.  As the Northern industrial base continues to generate wealth and stability, there would have remained only a "reason" to step in and help...with a price.

This is all speculation, though.  It is fun to think about - nothing more.

Have you ever read the book "The Cousins Wars" by Kevin Phillips?  I think you would find it fascinating.  Phillips' basic assertion is that the British Civil War under Cromwell, The American Revolution and the American Civil War are all three 'battles' is the same continuous war.  The underlying cause of this continuous war is religious in nature - bascially what we could call religious conservatives vs religious liberals; if you look at his timeline, a battle every 100 years or so,  we are due for another bout.

The players in this war are what he dubs "Anglo-Americans."  He does not view the British as separate people from Americans, even now.

It's a very interesting thesis.

Quote

Short version, the right side won.


I've said this before, and I'll stick to it.  I think from a moral perspective (slavery), that point cannot be argued.  From a 10th Amendment perspective, well, the Civil War destroyed what was left of the 10th Amendment (already weakened by 1860).  I am not as convinced as you are that that fact has been good for our nation.

Is it fair to say you would describe yourself as a Federalist?
Logged

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Professor Hathaway:  I noticed you stopped stuttering.
Bodie:      I've been giving myself shock treatments.
Professor Hathaway: Up the voltage.

--Real Genius
CheezeFlixz
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 496
Posts: 3747


Pathetic Earthlings


WWW
« Reply #20 on: January 30, 2008, 10:12:47 AM »

My strong opinion on term limits comes from the fact were I live we have some lifer congressional reps (Mitch McConnell, Ed Whitfield) that have done little if anything to improve the quality of life, i.e. jobs. I live in far, far western KY and we call it political Siberia, as the ONLY TIME you see any of our reps, state or federal is during an election year. The town I live near had a larger population in 1890 than it does today ... why jobs are going to Mexico, China etc. and no new jobs are coming in. Only after decades of saying a road here or a road there would improve commerce did they final build a road and a few businesses have moved in, but the road is not finished and likely will not be for 10 years, 10 years? We sent a man to the moon in less time. Anyway that's local crap that gives me a national attitude.

Derf - Ted Kennedy would be in jail today if he wasn't a Kennedy. He is a prime example of being there to long. And I agree Bush hasn't been as bad many would like to portray, tax cuts work and entitlements don't. I didn't agree with him on immigration but faced with what he has been faced with, he's done a good job and history will tell. It's easy to blame Bush, but some folks forget he's not the only guy/gal in Washington.   
Logged

indianasmith
Archeologist, Theologian, Elder Scrolls Addict, and a
B-Movie Kraken
*****

Karma: 2591
Posts: 15182


A good bad movie is like popcorn for the soul!


« Reply #21 on: January 30, 2008, 06:37:56 PM »

Ulthar - definitely I would have sided with the Federalists!!  Truthfully, the more fully and carefully I study the lives of Jefferson and Hamilton, the more tarnished my view of Jefferson becomes.  Hamilton was far from perfect, and Jefferson's influence was needed to put the brakes on his excesses, but by and large, Hamilton had a far more realistic view of the way the world worked.

Funny that came up, I was just teaching about Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson, and the 1796 election today!
Logged

"I shall smite you in the nostrils with a rod of iron, and wax your spleen with Efferdent!!"
ulthar
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 368
Posts: 4168


I AM serious, and stop calling me Shirley


WWW
« Reply #22 on: January 30, 2008, 11:43:38 PM »

Ulthar - definitely I would have sided with the Federalists!!  Truthfully, the more fully and carefully I study the lives of Jefferson and Hamilton, the more tarnished my view of Jefferson becomes.  Hamilton was far from perfect, and Jefferson's influence was needed to put the brakes on his excesses, but by and large, Hamilton had a far more realistic view of the way the world worked.

Funny that came up, I was just teaching about Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson, and the 1796 election today!

Interesting.  Going back a little farther than the actual framers, where does John Locke fit into your perspective?  I ask because I think the Southern Culture aspect I spoke of could be argued to be more than just a little Lockian.  There's definitely a "Don't Tread On Me" mentality that is ingrained down here, and I think it is that more than anything that pushes the "South Will Rise Again" and "War of Northern Aggression" type attitudes - attitudes that are definitely NOT of the mind that the "right side won the war."  It is THIS aspect that causes people, Southerners, to say that the war was not about slavery (while they conveniently forget that slavery WAS the issue of disagreement between Washington Rules and Each State Rules Itself).
Logged

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Professor Hathaway:  I noticed you stopped stuttering.
Bodie:      I've been giving myself shock treatments.
Professor Hathaway: Up the voltage.

--Real Genius
indianasmith
Archeologist, Theologian, Elder Scrolls Addict, and a
B-Movie Kraken
*****

Karma: 2591
Posts: 15182


A good bad movie is like popcorn for the soul!


« Reply #23 on: January 31, 2008, 07:42:24 AM »

Locke was a guiding principle behind both sides I think.  The whole Social Contract view of government pervaded Jefferson's writing.  It was the South's inability to grasp that the "natural rights" doctrine must apply to everyone that let them simultaneously argue for slavery and liberty and never see the inherent contradiction in that position . . .
Logged

"I shall smite you in the nostrils with a rod of iron, and wax your spleen with Efferdent!!"
trekgeezer
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 0
Posts: 4973


We're all just victims of circumstance


« Reply #24 on: January 31, 2008, 09:03:48 AM »

I voted for W twice, only because of what the alternatives were.   Thank goodness that bonehead is leaving.
Logged




And you thought Trek isn't cool.
lester1/2jr
B-Movie Kraken
*****

Karma: 1109
Posts: 12268



WWW
« Reply #25 on: January 31, 2008, 10:18:32 AM »

with the exception of ron paul,  all the candidates seem to be running for the president of the america of 10 or twenty years ago.  stayng on the offensive in the war on terror and giving americans health insurance are laudable goals but they are simply not feasible when we are

1.in the middle of two wars, neither of which look like they are ending soon.

2.  in a recession more or less

3.  have a joke-ola dollar that is not even as strong as the freakin vietnamese DONG

4.  have borrowed taxed inflated and otherwise spent ourselves into massive massive debt the likes of which the world has never seen.



the next president does not need to be uplifting, market savvy, militarily courageous or anything else.  they need to know how to cut spending and say no to people who have been receiving those government dollars.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Other Topics  |  Off Topic Discussion  |  STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS « previous next »
    Jump to:  


    RSS Feed Subscribe Subscribe by RSS
    Email Subscribe Subscribe by Email


    Popular Articles
    How To Find A Bad Movie

    The Champions of Justice

    Plan 9 from Outer Space

    Manos, The Hands of Fate

    Podcast: Todd the Convenience Store Clerk

    Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!

    Dragonball: The Magic Begins

    Cool As Ice

    The Educational Archives: Driver's Ed

    Godzilla vs. Monster Zero

    Do you have a zombie plan?

    FROM THE BADMOVIES.ORG ARCHIVES
    ImageThe Giant Claw - Slime drop

    Earth is visited by a GIANT ANTIMATTER SPACE BUZZARD! Gawk at the amazingly bad bird puppet, or chuckle over the silly dialog. This is one of the greatest b-movies ever made.

    Lesson Learned:
    • Osmosis: os·mo·sis (oz-mo'sis, os-) n., 1. When a bird eats something.

    Subscribe to Badmovies.org and get updates by email:

    HOME B-Movie Reviews Reader Reviews Forum Interviews TV Shows Advertising Information Sideshows Links Contact

    Badmovies.org is owned and operated by Andrew Borntreger. All original content is © 1998 - 2014 by its respective author(s). Image, video, and audio files are used in accordance with the Fair Use Law, and are property of the film copyright holders. You may freely link to any page (.html or .php) on this website, but reproduction in any other form must be authorized by the copyright holder.