Bad Movie Logo
"A website to the detriment of good film"
Custom Search
HOMEB-MOVIE REVIEWSREADER REVIEWSFORUMINTERVIEWSUPDATESABOUT
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 07:50:42 AM
713327 Posts in 53056 Topics by 7725 Members
Latest Member: wibwao
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Other Topics  |  Off Topic Discussion  |  misleading facts in movies.. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: misleading facts in movies..  (Read 10695 times)
asimpson2006
Bad Movie Lover
***

Karma: 46
Posts: 887



« Reply #15 on: April 08, 2008, 11:04:27 AM »

I really wish that were true, but unfortunately there are a huge number of people who believe that everything they see in a movie or TV show is true, or at least technically accurate. 

It's sad that people believe what they see on TV or in a movie.  If they didn't many people wouldn't have wacky views about the Martial Arts.

Logged
BoyScoutKevin
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 277
Posts: 5030


« Reply #16 on: April 08, 2008, 07:17:50 PM »

Darn! Wouldn't you know it? As soon as I log off, I thought of a couple of films are historically accurate, plus being good films as well. While not 100% accurate, they are probably more accurate than most historical films. Of course, they are "Glory" and "The Bounty."

Actually, since I have always been interested in how characters relate to each other in a film, I have a list of films, divided by century, that depict the most accurate character relationships, that I have found, if nothing else.

14th The Reckoning
15th The Messenger
----  Romeo and Juliet (1968)
16th Lady Jane
17th The 3 Musketeers (1970)
---- The 4 Musketeers
18th Barry Lyndon
---- The Bounty
---- Brotherhood of the Wolf
19th The Alamo (2004)
---- Glory
---- Shane
20th Lair of the White Worm
---- Two Brothers
Multiple The Greatest Game Ever Played
Logged
SynapticBoomstick
Cinematic Monster Fanatic from Weird New Jersey
Bad Movie Lover
***

Karma: 92
Posts: 867


One monster with extra cheese, hold the plot.


WWW
« Reply #17 on: April 08, 2008, 08:00:12 PM »

I really wish that were true, but unfortunately there are a huge number of people who believe that everything they see in a movie or TV show is true, or at least technically accurate. 

uh-huuurr-huuurr-huuurr! Teh Transporter 7w0 is t0t4ly r34list1c!
Logged

Kleel's rule is harsh :-B
Killer Bees
Newly Appointed Government Employee and
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 177
Posts: 1287


Never give up on love


« Reply #18 on: April 08, 2008, 11:01:29 PM »

People don't want movies to be about real life.  They can look out their windows for that.  What they want is movies to appear to mirror real life and then they wish life was actually like that.

Think about some of the movies you've seen.  Can you imagine if life was actually like that?  Cars that explode when they hit another car.  A person getting shot multiple times and still being able to stand up.  Unimaginable beasties attacking major cities.  Viruses causing people to become zombies.  Vampires attacking Alaskan towns.  Psycho killers coming back to life time and again.

Sure, it'd be exciting.  But life would be worse than a war zone.
Logged

Flower, gleam and glow
Let your power shine
Make the clock reverse
Bring back what once was mine
Heal what has been hurt
Change the fates' design
Save what has been lost
Bring back what once was mine
What once was mine.......
AndyC
Global Moderator
B-Movie Kraken
****

Karma: 1402
Posts: 11156



« Reply #19 on: April 09, 2008, 06:35:18 AM »

I think the distinction is in what the movie sets out to do, or at least claims to be doing.

We've all made our positions on nitpicking pretty clear, thanks to Wyrewizard. I don't think this is about fictional technologies or tweaking the laws of physics for entertainment value, but more about events presented as factual which are not.

There's nothing wrong with tweaking details, compressing timelines or cutting down on characters to make the story work better as a film, or setting a fictional story within an actual event. However, you have to get the big stuff right.

The Great Escape was a highly fictionalized account, but it worked because they got the basic history right and avoided any glaring anachronisms.

On the other hand, The Elephant Man had Frederick Treves rescuing Joseph Merrick (erroneously called John Merrick) from an abusive sideshow promoter, when in fact, Merrick was well treated in the sideshow, earned a decent living and actually approached the doctor for help with his condition. That's just too much dramatic licence for a film claiming to be biographical.
« Last Edit: April 09, 2008, 02:47:06 PM by AndyC » Logged

---------------------
"Join me in the abyss of savings."
Trevor
Uncle Zombie and Eminent Shitologist
B-Movie Kraken
*****

Karma: 2121
Posts: 22709



« Reply #20 on: April 09, 2008, 09:59:06 AM »

I just saw Billie August's woeful Goodbye Bafana which deals with the supposed close relationship between Nelson Mandela and his last warder, James Gregory. Mr Mandela has been quoted as saying that his relationship with Gregory was not close at all and certainly not as close as shown in the film.

Logged

I know I can make it on my own if I try, but I'm searching for the Great Heart
To stand me by, underneath the African sky
A Great Heart to stand me by.
ulthar
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 368
Posts: 4168


I AM serious, and stop calling me Shirley


WWW
« Reply #21 on: April 09, 2008, 10:28:09 AM »

What I like is when sanctimonius intellectual-wannabes like the writers of this Yahoo List spout off incorrect facts or gross misinterpretations in their effort to point out the stupidity of others.

See, the problem is that their list does about as much harm to 'history education' as the movies they deride.  Rather than correcting mistakes, they compound them.

My example?  THE PATRIOT.  If Gibson's character was based on Francis Marion, why don't they mention Marion was nowhere near Guilford's Courthouse, which is the obvious nitpick.  But no, rather they focus on the fact that the Patriots "lost" that battle.

While this is technically true, this battle is a classic example of a Pyrrhic Victory - a battle in which the 'winning side' really lost in the strategic sense.  Cornwallis' Army was so devasted at Guilford's Courthouse that it never really recovered.  Most actual scholars on the American Revolution consider this one of the key battles that ultimately led to Corwallis' surrender, and thus American victory, in the war.

Okay, what about Marion's killing "innocent Cherokees" as their attempt at character assassination?  Yes, Marion was a participant in the Indian Wars fought in the mountains of NC and TN.  As did Daniel Morgan (of King's Mountain fame, who actually WAS at Guilford's Courthouse) and other prominent officers of the Continental Army doing the King's Service in the colonies before the rebellion.  In fact, it was probably from the Cherokees (and their neighbors) that he learned much of what he applied later in the sandhillls of SC in terms of guerilla warfare wherein he became probably the most significant figure in the lineage of the modern US Army Rangers.

The way it's worded, the Yahoos at Yahoo make it sound like Marion was sport killing Indians during that period that 'pop' history traditionally shows "us vs them"  - post Civil War settlement of the West.  In other words, he did not "pursue and murder" innocent Cherokees, he was a soldier in an Army engaged in warfare.  We can debate the morality of that war with 200 years of hindsight, but that does not change the fact that warfare is not murder (and it's not like the Cherokees just laid down and got slaughtered).

Geez.  If we are going to have an article on historical accuracy on Yahoo, we should at least hope for some accuracy in THAT article.
Logged

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Professor Hathaway:  I noticed you stopped stuttering.
Bodie:      I've been giving myself shock treatments.
Professor Hathaway: Up the voltage.

--Real Genius
Pages: 1 [2]
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Other Topics  |  Off Topic Discussion  |  misleading facts in movies.. « previous next »
    Jump to:  


    RSS Feed Subscribe Subscribe by RSS
    Email Subscribe Subscribe by Email


    Popular Articles
    How To Find A Bad Movie

    The Champions of Justice

    Plan 9 from Outer Space

    Manos, The Hands of Fate

    Podcast: Todd the Convenience Store Clerk

    Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!

    Dragonball: The Magic Begins

    Cool As Ice

    The Educational Archives: Driver's Ed

    Godzilla vs. Monster Zero

    Do you have a zombie plan?

    FROM THE BADMOVIES.ORG ARCHIVES
    ImageThe Giant Claw - Slime drop

    Earth is visited by a GIANT ANTIMATTER SPACE BUZZARD! Gawk at the amazingly bad bird puppet, or chuckle over the silly dialog. This is one of the greatest b-movies ever made.

    Lesson Learned:
    • Osmosis: os·mo·sis (oz-mo'sis, os-) n., 1. When a bird eats something.

    Subscribe to Badmovies.org and get updates by email:

    HOME B-Movie Reviews Reader Reviews Forum Interviews TV Shows Advertising Information Sideshows Links Contact

    Badmovies.org is owned and operated by Andrew Borntreger. All original content is © 1998 - 2014 by its respective author(s). Image, video, and audio files are used in accordance with the Fair Use Law, and are property of the film copyright holders. You may freely link to any page (.html or .php) on this website, but reproduction in any other form must be authorized by the copyright holder.