Main Menu

Fattest and Leanest Cities in the U.S.

Started by InformationGeek, May 05, 2010, 04:35:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

InformationGeek

I always find this list interesting.  Sadly and happily, none of the cities in my state have made the Top 10 of any of the lists, though Milwaukee ranks in at 34 for fatest.  Anyways, your thoughts on this list?  Are you living in any of these cities?

http://health.msn.com/weight-loss/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=100257787&gt1=31036
Website: http://informationgeekreviews.blogspot.com/

We live in quite an interesting age. You can tell someone's sexual orientation and level of education from just their interests.

Flick James

Heh heh. Texas has 5 cities in the top 10. EVERYTHING is bigger in Texas.
I don't always talk about bad movies, but when I do, I prefer badmovies.org

Flick James

HAH! Another little factoid. Texas has more WalMarts than any other state. Coincidence? I THINK NOT!!!
I don't always talk about bad movies, but when I do, I prefer badmovies.org

Rev. Powell

51st fattest.  (That's me, not my hometown  :buggedout:).
I'll take you places the hand of man has not yet set foot...

Derf

Living very near to Corpus Christi (I'm there almost every day), I can attest that it deserves its ranking. Just a few years ago, it was ranked #1 for teen pregnancies. I guess we've got a lot of chubby chasers around here.  :twirl:
"They tap dance not, neither do they fart." --Greensleeves, on the Fig Men of the Imagination, in "Twice Upon a Time."

retrorussell

I'm not surprised Portland OR is in the top 10 for leanest.  Lots of walks for charity, and lots of cyclists.  Unfortunately, drivers aren't too thrilled with cyclists being all over the road.
"O the legend they say, on a Valentine's Day, is a curse that'll live on and on.."

Flick James

Also, it's very easy to hike for hours in Oregon. Just something about the climate.
I don't always talk about bad movies, but when I do, I prefer badmovies.org

retrorussell

Quote from: Flick James on May 05, 2010, 09:37:23 PM
Also, it's very easy to hike for hours in Oregon. Just something about the climate.
True.  You been there before Flick?
Also, there's plenty of rainfall to keep all the plants and trees round here happy and healthy and producing clean air.  Not many factories belching thick black smoke to ruin it either.  Portland is very ecologically-friendly.
"O the legend they say, on a Valentine's Day, is a curse that'll live on and on.."

Trevor

I don't know about 'fattest' and 'leanest' cities, but Pretoria can be a real dirty city sometimes.  :buggedout:
We shall meet in the place where there is no darkness.

Leah

New Orleans, number 18. Well, I can see that, with more local foods over corporate foods.
yeah no.

Flick James

Quote from: retrorussell on May 05, 2010, 11:14:24 PM
Quote from: Flick James on May 05, 2010, 09:37:23 PM
Also, it's very easy to hike for hours in Oregon. Just something about the climate.
True.  You been there before Flick?
Also, there's plenty of rainfall to keep all the plants and trees round here happy and healthy and producing clean air.  Not many factories belching thick black smoke to ruin it either.  Portland is very ecologically-friendly.

Sure. My old band in L.A. used to go on the road in the 90's up and down the coast and we played in Portland and Eugene a couple of times each. I love the pacific northwest in general.
I don't always talk about bad movies, but when I do, I prefer badmovies.org

The Burgomaster

I live just a few miles north of Boston, which came in at #52.  I would have though Boston would be in the top 20.  We have some fatties here.
"Do not walk behind me, for I may not lead. Do not walk ahead of me, for I may not follow. Do not walk beside me either. Just pretty much leave me the hell alone."

ulthar

Methodology here makes no sense.

Assessing the number of people who are 'overweight' makes perfect sense for a 'fattest' or 'leanest' cities list.

However...

Money spent on fast food?  Times fast food eaten in a month?  Haven't left the couch in a month?

This is nonsensical crap.

True, there may SOME correlation between fast food consumption and being overweight, or couch-sitting and being over weight.  But that does NOT mean that you can simply rank the $$ spent on fast food or times eaten make from that "these are the fattest cities."

But I guess it's cute and all to publish "science" like this....   :lookingup:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Professor Hathaway:  I noticed you stopped stuttering.
Bodie:      I've been giving myself shock treatments.
Professor Hathaway: Up the voltage.

--Real Genius

Rev. Powell

Quote from: ulthar on May 06, 2010, 11:57:20 AM
Methodology here makes no sense.

Assessing the number of people who are 'overweight' makes perfect sense for a 'fattest' or 'leanest' cities list.

However...

Money spent on fast food?  Times fast food eaten in a month?  Haven't left the couch in a month?

This is nonsensical crap.

True, there may SOME correlation between fast food consumption and being overweight, or couch-sitting and being over weight.  But that does NOT mean that you can simply rank the $$ spent on fast food or times eaten make from that "these are the fattest cities."

But I guess it's cute and all to publish "science" like this....   :lookingup:

Yeah, it's not science, it's journalism.  "Men's Health" isn't a peer-reviewed journal.  To be fair I don't think that it's trying to position itself as a serious scientific study; it's really nothing more than a conversation starter.
I'll take you places the hand of man has not yet set foot...

3mnkids

The nearest major city to me would be St. Louis and it ranks 49(C) One big difference between living here and living in the south is how the schools push PE. Here it is every day, down there my kids had it once a week.
There's no worse feeling than that millisecond you're sure you are going to die after leaning your chair back a little too far~ ruminations