I've personally seen better graphics on Xbox 360.
Really? Such as? I'm honestly curious, as I've never seen anything nearly as convincing in a video game as any of the Na'vi.
Here's a still from Avatar. I'd like to see something organic and created with CG that was better.
That too me looks more convincing than a na'vi. Less annoying too.
Well, the shots in the dark are greatly helped by how.. Dark they are. Jurassic Park still looks good, but look at the T-rex CG shots in the parts where it is daytime (you might notice there aren't many of them, probably for this reason) and there's a little "pop" from it not perfectly blending into the shot. It's there in the night shots too, just better covered. And of course, it's always obvious when they switch from animatronics (probably the best ones ever made) to CG and back.
I will say I find some of the CG effects in Jurassic Park to be better than some of the creature work in Avatar - particularly the "dog" things, which have great texture and lighting effects work on them, but some of their motion isn't as up to snuff. But not the Na'vi, especially Neytiri, who's to date the most believable effects creation of her kind I've seen in any format. I'll not comment on how annoying they may be though.
In any case, I meant video games. I've never seen a video game with graphics nearly as convincing as Jurassic Park, either. They don't normally even try, going for a quasi-cartoony look even in most "realistic" video games like Call of Duty and so forth. For this reason, I don't think it's even a good comparison, but it was made so...