Nominations for Worst Movies of 2010

[Rev. Powell]

OK, this is the third year for I've done this.  Here's how it works: give your nominations for the worst movies of 2010 in this thread.  On Dec. 24, I'll take all the nominations and put them into a poll, and the badmovies.org community will vote for the Worst Movie of 2010.

There's a mirror-image thread for Best Movie of 2010 on the "Good Movies" board.

As far as my nomination, I considered HUMAN CENTIPEDE (but decided not to nominate it out of respect for AndyC) and TRASH HUMPERS (won't nominate it because I don't think anyone else has seen it).  So in the end, my vote goes to:

MACGRUBER:  Is it a cliche to nominate a movie based on a Saturday Night Live skit for worst movie of the year?  Maybe, but it's especially a good idea when the original skit wasn't that good too begin with.  This had a chance to be a funny spoof of 1980s action movies but totally lost its way with awful, awful jokes and no characters to root for.  Ugh. 

So what's your nomination?

[claws]

2001 Maniacs: Field of Screams

[akiratubo]

I didn't see many new movies this year but I'll have to go with ...

Iron Man 2

It was boring as all get out.  I almost fell asleep several times, no joke.  The fight at the race track was the only exciting part.  Even the battle against the drones at the end was uninteresting.  (Also, the drones appeared to be extremely vulnerable to standard 5.56 NATO rounds, since War Machine blew one apart with an FN F2000 carbine.)

Also, I couldn't stand Pepper (didn't like her in the first one, either) or Hammer.  Replace them with less annoying characters and the movie would have been improved at least 75%.

[ImaginaryFoot]

The Last Exorcism

[Olivia Bauer]

I would say "The Expendables". It was advertised as the first film to star both Sylvester Stalone and Arnold Schwarzenegger together in a basic 1980's style action flick. Plus it stared Mickey Rourke, "Stone Cold" Steve Austin, and multiple other great actors. What did I get?

Boring plot
Underdeveloped characters
Bland action sequences

And worst of all,

Arnold and Stalone were only on screen together for 5 minutes. Without guns, screaming, or one-liners. Just calling each other immature names. I'll admit though. The two fighting (even if verbally) was the best part of the film. It was fun as hell. But the rest was just dull.

Arnold had absolutely no impact on the plot. Seriously! He popped in once and was never mentioned again!

Mickey Rourke wasn't even one of the people fighting. He was some boring tattoo artist who interrupts the film for an extreme close-up of his [expilative]ed-up aging face while he rambled on endlessly about some random chick who he didn't stop from throwing herself from a windows.

BORING!! 

[InformationGeek]

Bah!  Let's nominate some real pieces of crap that just about everyone hates.  As such, I nominate Vampires Suck.

[Mr. DS]

Shrek Ever After...unfunny, unwitty and just plain awful. 

[Doggett]

Clash of the Titans (2010)


Rubbish.
Just rubbish. 

[Nukie 2]

"Mega Piranha"

You can now buy it for $5 at Wal-Mart, I'm thinking about it, but I believe I'll end up watching it alone, which is no fun.

[Rev. Powell]

Bah!  Let's nominate some real pieces of crap that just about everyone hates.  As such, I nominate Vampires Suck and The Last Airbender.

Yeah, but most of us were smart enough not to go see those.   

[Rev. Powell]

"Mega Piranha"

You can now buy it for $5 at Wal-Mart, I'm thinking about it, but I believe I'll end up watching it alone, which is no fun.

I kind of liked that one.  Pure cheese, fun to mock.

[Doc Daneeka]

Saw 3D.

I'm usually alone with the Saw-love here at Badmovies.org, but with something like part "3D" (which actually means 7), I feel it's actually within my Saw-love to condemn this film for so markedly dropping the ball like an idiot in the final stretch.

[Jim H]

Looking at my IMDB voting history, the lowest rated film in 2010 is Legion.  Yeah, it was pretty bad - oddly though, it was actually better than I expected.  Think some folks on here would get a kick out of it, just don't expect a legitimately GOOD film.

[Raffine]

I nominate SKYLINE.

I wrote about how much this movie annoyed me on its main thread a while back. 

But mainly I was annoyed because they wanted you to sit through the credits to look at some stupid pictures that only extended the already stupid ending - and I had to go pee real bad.

[MrMari]

I would say "The Expendables". It was advertised as the first film to star both Sylvester Stalone and Arnold Schwarzenegger together in a basic 1980's style action flick. Plus it stared Mickey Rourke, "Stone Cold" Steve Austin, and multiple other great actors. What did I get?

Boring plot
Underdeveloped characters
Bland action sequences

And worst of all,

Arnold and Stalone were only on screen together for 5 minutes. Without guns, screaming, or one-liners. Just calling each other immature names. I'll admit though. The two fighting (even if verbally) was the best part of the film. It was fun as hell. But the rest was just dull.

Arnold had absolutely no impact on the plot. Seriously! He popped in once and was never mentioned again!

Mickey Rourke wasn't even one of the people fighting. He was some boring tattoo artist who interrupts the film for an extreme close-up of his [expilative]ed-up aging face while he rambled on endlessly about some random chick who he didn't stop from throwing herself from a windows.

BORING!! 

Dude, talk about well put. 

My girlfriend who has a hard time distinguishing films within our genre turned to me in the theater and said, "this isn't even good in your BAD MOVIE way..."