Bad Movie Logo
"A website to the detriment of good film"
Custom Search
HOMEB-MOVIE REVIEWSREADER REVIEWSFORUMINTERVIEWSUPDATESABOUT
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:42:26 AM
714351 Posts in 53095 Topics by 7742 Members
Latest Member: KathleneKa
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Movies  |  Bad Movies  |  What do you all thing "The Thing" really looked like? « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What do you all thing "The Thing" really looked like?  (Read 2747 times)
Akira Tubo
Guest
« on: April 30, 2002, 08:23:51 PM »

I mean, of course, the one from John Carpenter's 1982 version.

I think its true form was wormlike.  Here is my evidence:

After the dog's head split apart, a worm slithered out from the body, pushing the skull off the neck.

Bennings was attacked by a long worm.

The thing that leaped from Norris' body looked like a worm growing a human head and rudimentary arms and legs.

A worm pulled Windows into the mouth of the Palmer monster.

The Blair monster looked like a worm with a t-rex mouth and miscellaneous appendages.
Logged
AndyC
Guest
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2002, 11:54:43 PM »

I think the wormlike appendages were simply tentacles this thing could sprout at will. Hard to say what it actually looked like, since every alien structure it formed was probably an imitation of some other animal it had assimilated.

The original story had a description of the alien found in the ice. It's been a while since I read it, so I can't quite remember it exactly. It had three angry red eyes. Again, there's no way of knowing if that's its original form.

Here's my theory: It's not really a single creature at all, but a complex colony of unicellular organisms working in unison. They share a group consciousness, and have the ability to sense how many of cells are present at any given time, from one to billions, doing their best with what they've got (head popping off and sprouting legs, blood jumping out of petrie dish).

Evolution simply took a different turn on their planet, and instead of going from unicellular organisms to multicellular organisms, these single-celled creatures formed a looser relationship. They would have to posess a fairly complex cellular structure and genetic code, and a highly evolved method of communication to function as a single shape-shifting being.

Of course, it might not have been evolution, but rather an alien science that was responsible. Maybe it was a biological weapon that consumed its creators and stole their technology to spread through the universe. Plenty of possibilities.
Logged
Akira Tubo
Guest
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2002, 12:35:57 AM »

That's what makes "The Thing" so great.  There's just so much you can do with it, if you've got the imagination.
Logged
Flangepart
Guest
« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2002, 10:41:37 AM »

As per the psychology of the creatures........intresting, that. I've often wondered about the beghavior of the alien in the first version of the story. Was it violent because of brain damage suffered in the crash, was it a homicidal crimminal among its own kind, or maby just radicaly xenophobic? It was an intelligent creature....but so are humans, and look at our history.
Logged
Future Blob
Guest
« Reply #4 on: May 01, 2002, 03:04:40 PM »



I haven't read the first version of the story, so I can only speak on Carpenter's version.

      Possibly it simply didn't see humans as being "sentient" lifeforms. Since it seemed to be able to mimic anything it absorbed, it's possible that it simply thought that we were "hosts" and things to be used as it saw fit. Not so much xenophobic but simply incapable of understanding that other beings were individual and unique rather than simply fodder. After all, if you could perfectly imitate John Smith, is John Smith so special, assuming you have all of his thoughts, memories ect?

  Or, perhaps it was on the run from some(thing)body else? Not a criminal as much  a refugee?
Logged
john
Guest
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2002, 02:13:50 AM »

>The original story had a description of the alien found in the ice.

"Eagerly Blair was stripping back the ropes. A single throw of the Tarpaulin revealed the thing. The ice had melted somewhat in the heat of the room, and it was clear and blue as thick, good glass. It shone wet and sleek under the harsh light of the unshielded globe above.

The room stiffened abruptly. It was face up there on the plain, greasy planks of the table. The broken haft of the bronze ice-axe was still buried in the queer skull. Three mad, hate-filled eyes blazed up with a living fire, bright as fresh-spilled blood, from a face ringed with a writhing, loathsome nest of worms, blue, mobile worms that crawled where hair should grow - "
Logged
Jim Hepler
Guest
« Reply #6 on: May 02, 2002, 07:40:52 AM »

Was the thing killed off or did it live?  It leaves the question wide open.  Was the black guy the thing?
Logged
AndyC
Guest
« Reply #7 on: May 02, 2002, 01:23:32 PM »

That's the beauty of the ending - you don't know.
Logged
john
Guest
« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2002, 04:20:10 AM »

Reportedly, Carpenter has said that his original ending was to have them both be the thing.
Logged
Erik J
Guest
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2002, 11:35:08 AM »

You know it still could have been both. They never said either way.
Logged
Pages: [1]
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Movies  |  Bad Movies  |  What do you all thing "The Thing" really looked like? « previous next »
    Jump to:  


    RSS Feed Subscribe Subscribe by RSS
    Email Subscribe Subscribe by Email


    Popular Articles
    How To Find A Bad Movie

    The Champions of Justice

    Plan 9 from Outer Space

    Manos, The Hands of Fate

    Podcast: Todd the Convenience Store Clerk

    Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!

    Dragonball: The Magic Begins

    Cool As Ice

    The Educational Archives: Driver's Ed

    Godzilla vs. Monster Zero

    Do you have a zombie plan?

    FROM THE BADMOVIES.ORG ARCHIVES
    ImageThe Giant Claw - Slime drop

    Earth is visited by a GIANT ANTIMATTER SPACE BUZZARD! Gawk at the amazingly bad bird puppet, or chuckle over the silly dialog. This is one of the greatest b-movies ever made.

    Lesson Learned:
    • Osmosis: os·mo·sis (oz-mo'sis, os-) n., 1. When a bird eats something.

    Subscribe to Badmovies.org and get updates by email:

    HOME B-Movie Reviews Reader Reviews Forum Interviews TV Shows Advertising Information Sideshows Links Contact

    Badmovies.org is owned and operated by Andrew Borntreger. All original content is © 1998 - 2014 by its respective author(s). Image, video, and audio files are used in accordance with the Fair Use Law, and are property of the film copyright holders. You may freely link to any page (.html or .php) on this website, but reproduction in any other form must be authorized by the copyright holder.