Bad Movie Logo
"A website to the detriment of good film"
Custom Search
HOMEB-MOVIE REVIEWSREADER REVIEWSFORUMINTERVIEWSUPDATESABOUT
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 07:50:25 PM
713372 Posts in 53058 Topics by 7725 Members
Latest Member: wibwao
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Other Topics  |  Off Topic Discussion  |  Philosophical Question of the Day . . . « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
Author Topic: Philosophical Question of the Day . . .  (Read 14425 times)
indianasmith
Archeologist, Theologian, Elder Scrolls Addict, and a
B-Movie Kraken
*****

Karma: 2591
Posts: 15182


A good bad movie is like popcorn for the soul!


« on: September 18, 2014, 05:36:14 PM »

I posted this one on my FB page and it got a LOT of great responses (it's still ongoing, in fact).
So here goes:

If you could go back in time and prevent the untimely death of any one person in history, who would it be?

(To avoid a huge religious debate, let's exempt Jesus of Nazareth from this discussion.  Plus, he has a track record of not staying dead!)
Logged

"I shall smite you in the nostrils with a rod of iron, and wax your spleen with Efferdent!!"
lester1/2jr
B-Movie Kraken
*****

Karma: 1109
Posts: 12268



WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2014, 06:39:57 PM »

I guess John Lennon would be an obvious answer. The Beatles were and remain so hugely influential, he could have gone on to have done amazing things that alas we'll never experience.

On the political side, I wonder if the US had taken care to protect Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan if she could have fomented a different kind of Arab Spring. Certainly Musharif and these people were not capable of anything like that. A pro democracy person who also had popular support is rare in the Muslim world.
Logged
zombie no.one
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 667
Posts: 5113


Oookaay...


« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2014, 07:52:41 PM »

Kurt Cobain.

similar reasons to what Lester said about Lennon.

I personally don't rate Lennon's post Beatles work that much. (that's not to say I wouldn't have liked him to live longer instead of being shot, of course)

- nitpicking here slightly, but I wouldn't class this as a philosophical question...
Logged

The Mandela Effect is a Mandela Effect
lester1/2jr
B-Movie Kraken
*****

Karma: 1109
Posts: 12268



WWW
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2014, 07:55:22 PM »

more of a hypothetical

Zombie-  When I saw Nirvana, Cobain catapulted his guitar about 30 feet upwards and nailed a disco ball in 2 or 3 tries. circa In Utero
Logged
JaseSF
Super Space Age Freaky Geek
B-Movie Kraken
*****

Karma: 719
Posts: 13871


Soon, your brain will turn to jelly.


« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2014, 07:55:53 PM »

Martin Luther King Jr.: he was a good man doing a lot of good. He also promoted change through nonviolence.
Logged

"This above all: To thine own self be true!"
ulthar
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 368
Posts: 4168


I AM serious, and stop calling me Shirley


WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2014, 08:26:44 PM »

Due to the Law of Unintended Consequences in combination with Butterfly Effect, I would not do it. 

How do you know that by preventing that one death, something far worse (and unpredictable) wouldn't happen?

There is also God's Will.  We don't know <i>why</i> ANYTHING happens, but things that seem bad to us can, and often do, turn out part of a greater good.  It's not our place to question these things.  Humbleness before the great mysteries of the universe is, I believe, a worthy goal in life.
Logged

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Professor Hathaway:  I noticed you stopped stuttering.
Bodie:      I've been giving myself shock treatments.
Professor Hathaway: Up the voltage.

--Real Genius
indianasmith
Archeologist, Theologian, Elder Scrolls Addict, and a
B-Movie Kraken
*****

Karma: 2591
Posts: 15182


A good bad movie is like popcorn for the soul!


« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2014, 09:31:28 PM »

In reality, you are probably quite correct, Ulthar.  Have you read Stephen King's 11/22/63?
It's a whole novel devoted to the premise of someone going back in time to prevent JFK from being killed.
That being said, if we were given the capability, could we not argue that God gave us that ability so that we could use it?

As far as my choice, I bounce back and forth between Abraham Lincoln - goodness knows his wisdom and enormous political skills
would have brought a more fair and just Reconstruction than the train wreck that was the duel between Andrew Johnson and Congress -
and Gaius Julius Caesar.  Caesar did some great things and some terrible things, but I truly believe his desire was to mend the
Republic, not to destroy it.  Also, the gross unfairness of his death - an unarmed man carrying out his duties, cut down by 22 armed
men, none of whom were worthy to undo his bootstrap, politically or militarily - it just always seemed wrong, somehow.
Logged

"I shall smite you in the nostrils with a rod of iron, and wax your spleen with Efferdent!!"
ulthar
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 368
Posts: 4168


I AM serious, and stop calling me Shirley


WWW
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2014, 10:27:18 PM »


Have you read Stephen King's 11/22/63?


I have not.  We have it around here somewhere.  My wife has asked me several times if I've read it yet.

Quote

could we not argue that God gave us that ability so that we could use it?


Sure.  That's similar to the argument that God gave us the abilities afforded by medical science to effect change in the course of disease and injury.

But when you enter time travel into the conversation, other problems are created.  Would it be moral to save Lincoln's life if that caused another person to never be born, even if that person was just some Joe Schmoe we have never heard of?  Or, how about a variant of the Grandfather Paradox.  We don't have to "kill our own Grandfather" for the paradox to still apply; what if saving Lincoln or Caesar caused YOU to never be born to go back in time and be the one to save him?

One of the beauties of philosophical and hypothetical discussions is that there is no right answer.

In that spirit, then...how about picking some unheard of peasant that died unpleasantly of Black Death?  Or perhaps one of the Jews at Auschwitz whose name we don't know? How to pick which one?

Alternatively, picking Lincoln...we don't know that he would not have turned into a power-mad dictator by '66. (no subtext, just a hypothetical comment). 

Thorny...

[/quote]
Logged

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Professor Hathaway:  I noticed you stopped stuttering.
Bodie:      I've been giving myself shock treatments.
Professor Hathaway: Up the voltage.

--Real Genius
indianasmith
Archeologist, Theologian, Elder Scrolls Addict, and a
B-Movie Kraken
*****

Karma: 2591
Posts: 15182


A good bad movie is like popcorn for the soul!


« Reply #8 on: September 19, 2014, 06:15:00 AM »

I've always understood it that if you did go back and alter the past, you could not return to the future you came from because it would no longer exist.
Overall, with that in mind, it would probably be better to be known as "the guy that saves Caesar from the daggers" than "the guy that saved Lincoln from a pistol."
Logged

"I shall smite you in the nostrils with a rod of iron, and wax your spleen with Efferdent!!"
Jack
B-Movie Kraken
*****

Karma: 1141
Posts: 10327



« Reply #9 on: September 19, 2014, 06:46:03 AM »

I wouldn't save anybody.  There would be an awful lot more people alive today if it weren't for all these "great men".  And these people credited with social change;  if you look at how things turned out in the end, well if that's what they call success I'd hate to see failure.

If anything I'd save some young innocent who died in a car crash or something. 
Logged

The world is changed by your example, not by your opinion.

- Paulo Coelho
zombie no.one
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 667
Posts: 5113


Oookaay...


« Reply #10 on: September 19, 2014, 07:05:24 AM »

more of a hypothetical

Zombie-  When I saw Nirvana, Cobain catapulted his guitar about 30 feet upwards and nailed a disco ball in 2 or 3 tries. circa In Utero
Random act of violence against a disco ball!   Smile

My friend had tickets for Nirvana's Cardiff gig on the in Utero tour, then of course he shot himself before they were played.

Actually kurt OD'd in Rome shortly before that as well. He had self destructive tendencies, so maybe it would be pointless going back and 'saving' him, cause he'd just do it again.

I'll change my vote to Hendrix. He surely had years of musical exploration in front of him
Logged

The Mandela Effect is a Mandela Effect
Rev. Powell
Global Moderator
B-Movie Kraken
****

Karma: 3100
Posts: 26772


Click on that globe for 366 Weird Movies


WWW
« Reply #11 on: September 19, 2014, 07:37:30 AM »

Mozart. Possibly the greatest musical genius in history, died at only 35. Who knows what masterpieces he would have composed if he lived another 30 years? I'd be willing to gamble on unintended consequences.
Logged

I'll take you places the hand of man has not yet set foot...
Flangepart
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 653
Posts: 9477



« Reply #12 on: September 19, 2014, 07:50:26 AM »


Overall, with that in mind, it would probably be better to be known as "the guy that saves Caesar from the daggers" than "the guy that saved Lincoln from a pistol."
Known by who? (And I don't mean the Doctor.)

Actions have unchangeable consequences. That's how we build a consistent memory, and therefor exist as conscious beings. Time Travel is based on the old desire to change the past...but change it too much, and how do we exist?
If Alzheimer's take's your memory...where does the real you go?
Logged

"Aggressivlly eccentric, and proud of it!"
ulthar
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 368
Posts: 4168


I AM serious, and stop calling me Shirley


WWW
« Reply #13 on: September 19, 2014, 07:59:04 AM »


if you did go back and alter the past, you could not return to the future you came from because it would no longer exist.


Not returning to the future (any future) does not remove the paradox.

Our present timeline: Indy did not save Lincoln because Indy was not born until the 20th century.  Indy did not exist at Ford's Theater.

Altered timeline: Indy saves Lincoln at Ford's Theater (or SOMETHING to prevent that action).  But...how did Indy get there to do that? Even if it was an innocuous act far removed from the actual shooting.  Who is your Mom?  Where were you 10 years prior?  How exactly did you just "pop up," and does no one even ask, "Hey, who's this guy?"

Once you change the timeline, the future also changes.  It is POSSIBLE in this scenario that the future does not change in a way that precludes you from going back or even existing.  But, that's not deterministic.  The problem is, what if the act of "saving Lincoln" means Indy was never born? Since Indy saved Lincoln, and now "space-time" has been altered in such a way that Indy never existed, who saved Lincoln to create the situation that Indy was never born?

The problem is not you returning to the future. It's a real paradox; it can't be solved.  The problem is the overlap of two timelines by you (someone from the future in our timeline) preventing something in the past.  The overlap is the problem.

With that out of the way, I'd be very careful about risking those unintended consequences.  What if by saving Caesar, his continued life led to mass extinction, such as pandemic during the Middle Ages or nuclear war in 1955?  Would that be worth it?  That's the problem with the Butterfly Effect; you just don't know.

But hey...no "right" answer. That's what distinguishes science from philosophy.  The latter is far happier with speculation.
Logged

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Professor Hathaway:  I noticed you stopped stuttering.
Bodie:      I've been giving myself shock treatments.
Professor Hathaway: Up the voltage.

--Real Genius
Ed, Ego and Superego
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 300
Posts: 3016



« Reply #14 on: September 19, 2014, 01:23:22 PM »


I'll change my vote to Hendrix. He surely had years of musical exploration in front of him

I second that.  I bet he would have reshaped later music for generations.   Plus he seemed inherently less pretentious than those Liverpool guys, or Jim Morrison.

-Ed
Logged

Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?

Si Hoc Legere Scis Nimium Eruditionis Habes
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Other Topics  |  Off Topic Discussion  |  Philosophical Question of the Day . . . « previous next »
    Jump to:  


    RSS Feed Subscribe Subscribe by RSS
    Email Subscribe Subscribe by Email


    Popular Articles
    How To Find A Bad Movie

    The Champions of Justice

    Plan 9 from Outer Space

    Manos, The Hands of Fate

    Podcast: Todd the Convenience Store Clerk

    Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!

    Dragonball: The Magic Begins

    Cool As Ice

    The Educational Archives: Driver's Ed

    Godzilla vs. Monster Zero

    Do you have a zombie plan?

    FROM THE BADMOVIES.ORG ARCHIVES
    ImageThe Giant Claw - Slime drop

    Earth is visited by a GIANT ANTIMATTER SPACE BUZZARD! Gawk at the amazingly bad bird puppet, or chuckle over the silly dialog. This is one of the greatest b-movies ever made.

    Lesson Learned:
    • Osmosis: os·mo·sis (oz-mo'sis, os-) n., 1. When a bird eats something.

    Subscribe to Badmovies.org and get updates by email:

    HOME B-Movie Reviews Reader Reviews Forum Interviews TV Shows Advertising Information Sideshows Links Contact

    Badmovies.org is owned and operated by Andrew Borntreger. All original content is © 1998 - 2014 by its respective author(s). Image, video, and audio files are used in accordance with the Fair Use Law, and are property of the film copyright holders. You may freely link to any page (.html or .php) on this website, but reproduction in any other form must be authorized by the copyright holder.