Main Menu

Remake of Big Trouble In Little China.

Started by Alex, June 02, 2015, 02:55:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Alex

QuoteAfter audiences hurried to see disaster strike in blockbuster San Andreas - it snagged $54 million at the box office over the weekend - it seems as if leading man Dwayne Johnson is heading back to California for his next adventure.

According to The Wrap, Johnson is "in negotiations" to star in and produce a remake of John Carpenter's action caper Big Trouble In Little China over at Fox. Should he iron out a deal to play Jack Burton, he'll be working from a script by X-Men: First Class writers Zack Stentz and Ashley Miller. The pair have already signed on to script the remake.



The original was released in 1982 and starred Kurt Russell as a truck driver who becomes embroiled in an ancient battle that takes place in San Francisco's Chinatown.  While initially it was labelled a box office flop, the film has since firmly established itself as a cult classic. Part sci-fi, part-horror, and all-action it's a brilliant Carpenter title from his '80s heyday and well worth a re-watch.

So part of me is thinking "Oh hell no!", but the other part of me is thinking, well maybe... if anyone can pull it off...

Hail to thyself
For I am my own master
I am my own god
I require no shepherd
For I am no sheep.

etmoviesb

Seeing how good Mad Max seems to be, maybe they can pull it off.

Trevor

Oy: next thing you know, they'll remake John Carpenter's Prince Of Darkness with me playing the lead role.  :tongueout: :twirl:
We shall meet in the place where there is no darkness.

Newt

Quote from: Dark Alex on June 02, 2015, 02:55:20 AM
So part of me is thinking "Oh hell no!", but the other part of me is thinking, well maybe... if anyone can pull it off...

Same for me.  Maybe. 
"May I offer you a Peek Frean?" - Walter Bishop
"Thank you for appreciating my descent into deviant behavior, Mr. Reese." - Harold Finch

Jack

Can't imagine that without Kurt Russell. 
The world is changed by your example, not by your opinion.

- Paulo Coelho

Flangepart

Why? Seriously, why? If they wanna, just re-do some FX like the space scenes in ST/TOS. I liked that. I like the Rock as an actor...but BTILC?
Oy...
"Aggressivlly eccentric, and proud of it!"

Alex

Just on a side note, I generally get round to listening to commentary tracks on DVD's at some point. Some of the best ones I've listened to were between Kurt Russell and John Carpenter on this and Escape From New York. They tend to wander completely off topic and chat about random things like old friends catching up.

I am alternating between feeling well thats going to be a pile of suck, and thinking well Dwayne does have plenty of charisma, but (assuming they make it in more or less the same way as the original), can he play a hero who is actually pretty useless at being a hero, or will they make it a more straight laced action film. Offhand I can't think of any roles he has played so far that go into that kind of territory (unless maybe you count The Tooth Fairy?).
Hail to thyself
For I am my own master
I am my own god
I require no shepherd
For I am no sheep.

Dr. Whom

I doubt it. It worked because Kurt Russell's character was essentially the comic relief sidekick, and he played it absolutely as the hero. I doubt whether the present day studios will greenlight such a subversive take on the genre. Most likely they will try to turn it into straight up action movie with a wisecracking hero and all will be lost.

Will Kim Cattrall reprise her role, I wonder?
"Once you get past a certain threshold, everyone's problems are the same: fortifying your island and hiding the heat signature from your fusion reactor."

Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer? Ja! ... Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.

Newt

I agree: it won't come off well at all if they cannot capture the same 'tone' as the first.  I can picture Dwayne Johnson doing it justice...given a chance. 
"May I offer you a Peek Frean?" - Walter Bishop
"Thank you for appreciating my descent into deviant behavior, Mr. Reese." - Harold Finch

ulthar

Man, a lot of Carpenter's films have been remade or slated for remakes.

My question is "Why do people think they need to be 'updated'?"  I mean, they have followings for a REASON.

I guess part of the blame lies on the misconception that a movie's visuals make the movie...that those 80's looks are passe and that's what needs to be updated.  But Carpenter in the 80's made films that transcend the visuals.

Carpenter was a tremendous film maker back in the day who was, as cliched as it sounds, ahead of his time.  I just view all these rehashings as perhaps an art lover would view a child's stick-figure drawing of The Mona Lisa.  They might be cute, but they will NEVER even approach the level of the base work.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Professor Hathaway:  I noticed you stopped stuttering.
Bodie:      I've been giving myself shock treatments.
Professor Hathaway: Up the voltage.

--Real Genius

messedup

Why not make a sequel with Russell? If Stallone can still play Rambo, Arnie can still play Terminator or Ford can still play Indy or Han Solo (kinda) I don't see why Russell couldn't.
But I honestly don't think I would mind seeing Dwayne in a remake if done right.

Dr. Whom

A sequel would make more sense, as has been shown by Mad Max. I wouldn't mind Dwayne Johnson in it as well, but, for me,  someone like Ryan Kwanten would be more suited. He has the ability to be heroic and completely baffled at the same time.
"Once you get past a certain threshold, everyone's problems are the same: fortifying your island and hiding the heat signature from your fusion reactor."

Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer? Ja! ... Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.

Bushma

This is my awesome signature.  Jealous?

BoyScoutKevin

Almost every time someone remakes a film, I save some money, because I have little or no interest in seeing most remakes, especially, as in this case, I saw the original. Though, now might be time to remake it, because the original one was a film seemingly ahead of its time. While it cost $25 million, low by today's standards, to make, it grossed only $11 million at the U.S. box office, and I presume it grossed an equal amount or less in the international box office. Thus, it was apparently a film that cost more to make than it recovered at the box office. Of course, that does not include TV, where I saw it, rights and DVD and video sales.

ChaosTheory

Would I like to see The Rock star in an offbeat action comedy? Absolutely.

Should that offbeat action comedy be a remake of BTiLC? Most definitely NOT.
Through the darkness of future past
The magician longs to see
One chance opts between two worlds
Fire walk with me