Bad Movie Logo
"A website to the detriment of good film"
Custom Search
HOMEB-MOVIE REVIEWSREADER REVIEWSFORUMINTERVIEWSUPDATESABOUT
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 06:13:53 AM
713391 Posts in 53058 Topics by 7725 Members
Latest Member: wibwao
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Movies  |  Bad Movies  |  Movies were people miss the point « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
Author Topic: Movies were people miss the point  (Read 14072 times)
dean
Guest
« Reply #45 on: October 31, 2003, 12:22:58 AM »


nshumate wrote:

>Whoa, now I'm confused.

>So the people who "got" the point, but disagreed with it and thought the point >was shallow and weak, THOSE are the people who are ignorant and foolish?

>Well, then color me ignorant and foolish. Signs was a shallow and convenient >treatment of faith. It's a movie that stupid people think is smart.

this seems to have confused a few people.

in my own haphazard way i was trying to explain a few things:  many people replying to the original post were complaining that the films posed by nick were stupid, because you'd have to be a moron to miss the various points made in these films.

yet i was arguing that it's not whether they got the point, nor whether they agreed with it or not, but that they are of the opinion that the film was complete crap because of other reasons that may not have anything to do with the point being made, and therefore coming across as ignorant and foolish to others.  

they seem that way, not because they agreed with the point or not, but because they declare a film to be utter crap without much explanation, which leads fans of these movies to believe that they missed the point.

whether you liked the films or not is your own opinion, you are well within your rights to think that signs was shallow, i personally am not very religious, and couldn't care less either way, i just liked the film, and thought fairly highly of the direction shymalan took on the film, despite it's obvious shortcomings.

george is right, you can find meaning in any film, just love it or hate it
Logged
Ash
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 0
Posts: 6775


23 Year Badmovies.org Veteran


« Reply #46 on: October 31, 2003, 02:22:56 AM »

Damn!
Where the hell have I been?

I finally read all the posts here and the s**t is getting hot!

Settle down kids!

I, to a point, also agree with wyckednick.
In my opinion & experienceJohn Q. Public in general is very dimwitted.  
 
After all....look at all of us here on this phorum.
I would venture to say that while a little geeky at times, we are all definitely a f**king smart bunch of people!  

I know alot of people that simply could not or would not maintain such a conversation about the underlying points that certain films try to make.  Especially other males.  They just cannot seem to tear their hyper-testosterone filled bodies away from the goddamn football game to even be interested in discussing such topics.  (no offense to any of you who like football....I myself hate it)

I've tried to get into such discussions with friends and the only thing they can come up with is, "Dude, you're a dork!"  
I simply shrug them off knowing that I probably have a higher I.Q. than they do.  Oh well...

As for "Signs", I love that film and agree with Roger Ebert that it is definitely the work of a born filmmaker.  
Go here to read his review:  http://www.suntimes.com/ebert/ebert_reviews/2002/08/080205.html
In my opinion it is pure genius...though alot of you might disagree.  
Again I say "Oh well..."

As for "Planet of the Apes"....I never liked the entire concept to begin with and found it rather dull.  (both versions)
I can think of about a hundred films that are more worth my time than POTA.

To each his own I guess.....

Logged
Evil Matt
Bad Movie Lover
***

Karma: 0
Posts: 183


« Reply #47 on: October 31, 2003, 02:44:52 AM »

It looks like I'm in the minority here, but when I watched "Signs", I totally dismissed the "preacherman gets his lost faith back" angle beforehand (in that I agree that it wanted people to think it was smart without actually being smart.  Lost faith and redemption isn't exactly a new concept).  If you watch the movie with your guard up and manage not to get beaten over the head with references to Mel Gibson's lost faith, it becomes an film about how one man deals with a huge scale alien invasion, and I thought that was kind of cool.  Usually the only people we see in a big alien invasion movie are the military, the scientists, and a glut of panicky citizens running  and screaming.  Oh...and Will Smith.

Logged

Everything's funnier with monkeys.
Lee
Bad Movie Lover
***

Karma: 0
Posts: 255


« Reply #48 on: November 03, 2003, 03:06:43 PM »

George wrote:

 
> Seriously, you can find deep symbolism in ANY movie if you look
> hard enough.  This type of thinking is the stuff from which
> conspiracy springs.  Just enjoy the films, kids.


George, I couldn't agree more.

Logged

This is the Hell that's my life.-Howard Stern: Private Parts
jmc
Bad Movie Lover
***

Karma: 1
Posts: 637


« Reply #49 on: November 03, 2003, 04:26:20 PM »

I just thought SIGNS was terribly made--and it's sad because it really could have been a good film, but he had to dilute any suspense with "cute kid" scenes and humor.  It was the worst movie I saw in a theater that year.  

I don't see how anyone could miss the "social commentary" in DAWN OF THE DEAD.  He hits you over the head with it repeatedly--personally, I think that's Romero's biggest weakness as a filmmaker, and it's definitely that movie's biggest weakness--he spends at least a half-hour on something he could have covered in a few minutes.  

As far as movies where the point is missed, I remember a ton of people in the little podunk town where I was raised complaining about the movie PULP FICTION "not making any sense" because characters died then came back.
The guy at the video store said "If you want to waste your money, rent PULP FICTION."   They also panned UNFORGIVEN because Eastwood didn't kill enough people.    Also have to agree about NATURAL BORN KILLERS, although I think that's partially Oliver Stone's fault.
Logged
yaddo42
Guest
« Reply #50 on: November 03, 2003, 07:59:58 PM »

I got that "Natural Born Killers" was supposed to be a satire of violent films. I just think Stone overdid it and made exactly the kind of film he was trying to poke fun of. Yes the cop was a creep, yes the media were greedy scoop chasers exploiting the suffering of Mickey and Mallory's victims for their own needs (especially the robert Downey Jr. character), but that didn't make Mickey and Mallory any better or excuse them just because they were products of a culture full these kinds of people. It didn't matter why they killed innocent people, they were still amoral serial killers no matte how cool or great they thought they were. Then again, I have a friend who claims everyone missed the point of the film and maintains it's a Great American Love Story.

"Signs". I'm mostly in agreement with Nathan Schumate's take about regaining faith mumbo-jumbo hiding inside a weak alien invasion flick. My problem with the "it all happened for a reason - so he could regain his faith" argument is that IIRC he didn't actually lose his faith until his wife died. So he had to lose his faith, so that after saving his family from the aliens, he could get it back? And what kind of parent gives a little girl large glasses to drink out of instead of plastic? Much less keep letting them build up on top of the TV and things without taking them away and washing out, wouldn't you run out of glasses to use or have to keep buying more? I know the guy was in a funk from his wife dying, but there's sacred "coincidences" and practical considerations like washing the dishes.
Logged
nshumate
B-Movie Site Webmaster
Bad Movie Lover
****

Karma: 80
Posts: 760



« Reply #51 on: November 03, 2003, 10:58:40 PM »

Lee wrote:

> George wrote:
>
>  
> > Seriously, you can find deep symbolism in ANY movie if you
> look
> > hard enough.  This type of thinking is the stuff from which
> > conspiracy springs.  Just enjoy the films, kids.
>
>
> George, I couldn't agree more.
>


They're not mutually exclusive, you know.  I enjoy Dawn of the Dead far more because of the critique of consumer culture.  I enjoy NOTLD far more because of the clashes between of the breakdown of authority structures and the posturing for alpha male status as a means of coping.  I enjoy the original Star Wars trilogy far more because of the Freudian motifs.

Understanding theme and subtext makes a good movie experience richer.

Logged

Nathan Shumate
Cold Fusion Video Reviews
Sci-fi, Horror, and General Whoopass
wickednick
Bad Movie Lover
***

Karma: 32
Posts: 566



« Reply #52 on: November 04, 2003, 05:01:28 AM »

I don't see how anyone could miss the "social commentary" in DAWN OF THE DEAD
Trust me most people who saw this movie missed it.Most of the people on this forum probably got it but I bet the average joe missed it.

Logged

Smells like popcorn and shame
jmc
Bad Movie Lover
***

Karma: 1
Posts: 637


« Reply #53 on: November 04, 2003, 05:51:17 AM »

Better that they did miss it....I can't wait to see the new disc that has the European cut that is thankfully free of that pretentious crap.    Personally, I thought it was about on the same level as the social commentary in NIGHT OF THE ZOMBIES.
Logged
Neon Noodle
Bad Movie Lover
***

Karma: 3
Posts: 368


« Reply #54 on: November 04, 2003, 11:49:03 PM »

some folks have said "Natural Born Killers" had a deep philosophical meaning; yet I have never seen what it is.

Maybe I am just naive.

Logged

____________________________________________________________
While on a journey, Chuang Tzu found an old skull, dry and parched.
With sorrow, he questioned and lamented the end of all things.
When he finished speaking, he dragged the skull over and, using it for a pillow, lay down to sleep.
In the night, the skull came to his dreams and said, 'You are a fool to rejoice in the entanglements of life.'
Chuang Tzu couldn`t believe this and asked, 'If I could return you to your life, you would want that, wouldn`t you?'
Stunned by Chuang Tzu`s foolishness, the skull replied, 'How do you know that it is bad to be dead?'

-From The Matrix: The Path of Neo
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Movies  |  Bad Movies  |  Movies were people miss the point « previous next »
    Jump to:  


    RSS Feed Subscribe Subscribe by RSS
    Email Subscribe Subscribe by Email


    Popular Articles
    How To Find A Bad Movie

    The Champions of Justice

    Plan 9 from Outer Space

    Manos, The Hands of Fate

    Podcast: Todd the Convenience Store Clerk

    Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!

    Dragonball: The Magic Begins

    Cool As Ice

    The Educational Archives: Driver's Ed

    Godzilla vs. Monster Zero

    Do you have a zombie plan?

    FROM THE BADMOVIES.ORG ARCHIVES
    ImageThe Giant Claw - Slime drop

    Earth is visited by a GIANT ANTIMATTER SPACE BUZZARD! Gawk at the amazingly bad bird puppet, or chuckle over the silly dialog. This is one of the greatest b-movies ever made.

    Lesson Learned:
    • Osmosis: os·mo·sis (oz-mo'sis, os-) n., 1. When a bird eats something.

    Subscribe to Badmovies.org and get updates by email:

    HOME B-Movie Reviews Reader Reviews Forum Interviews TV Shows Advertising Information Sideshows Links Contact

    Badmovies.org is owned and operated by Andrew Borntreger. All original content is © 1998 - 2014 by its respective author(s). Image, video, and audio files are used in accordance with the Fair Use Law, and are property of the film copyright holders. You may freely link to any page (.html or .php) on this website, but reproduction in any other form must be authorized by the copyright holder.