Bad Movie Logo
"A website to the detriment of good film"
Custom Search
HOMEB-MOVIE REVIEWSREADER REVIEWSFORUMINTERVIEWSUPDATESABOUT
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 09:33:46 AM
713408 Posts in 53060 Topics by 7725 Members
Latest Member: wibwao
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Movies  |  Bad Movies  |  Scifi Lies to us once again... « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: Scifi Lies to us once again...  (Read 5376 times)
Bobford
Guest
« on: July 13, 2004, 04:54:36 PM »

It IS DEFINITELY a stunt.

They pulled the same irritating crap with The Blair Witch Project.

Made a documentary they said was REAL and TERRIFYING.

It is just to promote the movie.  Nothing more.  I doubt there will be much truth in it whatsoever.

I was very irritated with Scifi Channel the first time.  

It won't make me stop watching them.  I love the channel.

But it does irritate me that they LIE for publicity.  It is not simply acting, because they advertise it as the truth.  That makes it a LIE.

This kind of crap should be below Scifi Channel.  They could have said it was a Fantasy Biography and I would have watched it anyway.  They do not have to LIE.
Logged
Yaddo42
Guest
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2004, 07:27:53 AM »

It's all advertising, just remember:

"Advertising is the rattling of a stick insdie a swill bucket." - George Orwell

"Advertising is legalized lying." - H.G. Wells

"Advertising is a valuable economic factor because it is the cheapest way of selling goods, particularly if the goods are worthless." - Sinclair Lewis
Logged
Token
Guest
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2004, 12:28:19 PM »

A paper called PAGE SIX reported that the "secret" involved a drowning M. Night witnessed when he was eleven years old. For real. This would explain his negative view on water in his movies.
Logged
Pus
Dedicated Viewer
**

Karma: 0
Posts: 50


« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2004, 09:35:53 PM »

Well I still enjoy Sci-Fi, but what I'm really looking forward to is October 31, 2004, when The Horror Channel hits the air. And kind of OT, have any of you seen the Sci-Fi movie "4400"? It's a decent WPAM. (Weird Post Apocalyptic Movie).

Logged

Cheese is good food. So are the movies. Not food that is, just cheese.
JohnL
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 0
Posts: 2388


« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2004, 07:03:22 PM »

The only 4400 I know of is the USA (limited) series, about 4400 people who went missing, being returned in a ball of light.
Logged
Toukee
Guest
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2004, 11:04:41 AM »

It's called a "Mock-umentary"

That's what "The Buried Secret of M. Night Shyamalan" was - it was a piece of entertainment that was produced to promote Shyamalan's latest film. I keep reading where people are debating if it was "real" or a "hoax" but it's neither of those...are you people actually unfamiliar with the films of Christopher Guest like "This is Spinal Tap" or "Best in Show" - ????

Guest does his mockumentary movies as comedy, so I assume that's why you never hear about any of his stuff being labeled "a hoax" - but the mockumentry style works just as well for other genres, too.

The SciFi Channel even aired a very similar mockumentary a few years ago that tied in with the national release of "The Blair Witch Project" - I think the SciFi mockumentary was called "Curse of the Blair Witch" (or something like that) - and in it, they interviewed family members, professors, etc of those three "Blair Witch kids" - and they did the whole thing completely seriously, as if you were watching a genuine dockumentary.

THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT TO THAT STYLE!!!!

It's supposed to come across like it's "real" - but it certainly isn't a hoax in any way...it's just a particular style of entertainment and it's been around for quite a while.
Logged
AndyC
Global Moderator
B-Movie Kraken
****

Karma: 1402
Posts: 11156



« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2004, 11:34:59 AM »

That is really the difference. Guest's movies are presented as 100% comedy and fiction, in a documentary style. Everything is silly and over the top, there are recognizable actors, and no one is ever intentionally led to believe that it is anything but satire. You have to be pretty dumb to be fooled. The aim is to entertain, not mislead.

Make the movie serious in tone, centre it around a real person, and advertise it as a documentary, and that's a hoax. The aim  is to suck in as many gullible people as possible. Much as the Curse of the Blair Witch attempted to fool people into thinking that movie was at least based on a real legend.

Can't say I've ever heard anyone debate the reality of Best in Show or Waiting for Guffman. They're clearly fiction, although there is a lot of truth in them. More truth than you will find in a crappy publicity stunt masquerading as something real.

Logged

---------------------
"Join me in the abyss of savings."
Toukee
Guest
« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2004, 12:03:39 PM »

well...

I think "The Buried Secret of M. Night Shyamalan" was equally as identifiable as an entertainment piece (not a "real documentary" I mean) as is anything by Christopher Guest.

The very first scene were the host guy returns to his hotel room and finds that he has been mysteriously "checked out" of the hotel and all of his possessions have vanished - I think that tips off the audience right away, so it really isn't an attempt at "hoaxing" the viewer.

If an event like that would have really happened...in fact, if any of what we saw in  "The Buried Secret of M. Night Shyamalan"  would have "really happened" it would have been all over the news! There are a huge amount of entertainment news sources now, like the programs "Entertainment Tonight" and "Access Hollywood" and all of the magazines like the National Inquirer, etc - even CNN has a whole "entertainment department" with regular spots each day devoted to covering entertainment news so almost everything that occurs within the entertainment industry is reported to the public...even if the public really has no interest  (were any of us spared the news of Ben and J-Lo's tragic break-up?) ...if the events of  "The Buried Secret of M. Night Shyamalan" were "real" we (the public) would have heard all about it long before SciFi aired that program.

It was the same way with "The Blair Witch Project" - if any of it had been "real" (college aged kids out making their own documentary who simply vanish off the face of the Earth, with the footage surfacing some time later showing supernatural events) - that would be an absolutely HUGE story...there is no way any of us could have possibly been spared the details every time we picked up a newspaper or turned on the tv.

I don't blame the producers of this style of entertainment if members of the public actually "buy into" the whole thing...publicity, after all, is their goal.

Now...take a step back from "The Buried Secret of M. Night Shyamalan" and let's say that you worked for the SciFi Channel and you knew all along that they were producing a "mockumentary" to promote the release of Shyamalan's latest movie. You look at the finished product and you're only real concern is:

"Will this entertain people?"

I think it was pretty well done, and ultimately it was entertaining.  I think that's the bottom line.
Logged
raven
Guest
« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2004, 12:08:22 PM »

i know man sci fi sometimes lies just 2 get ppl 2 watch it
Logged
Toukee
Guest
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2004, 12:13:02 PM »

ummmmm...

no.

That's like saying the producers of the movie "Spiderman II" were lying because Tobey Maguire really can't do all of the stuff he did in the movie - they used CGI special effects to lie to people just to get people to go to the movie.

It's all just entertainment.
Logged
AndyC
Global Moderator
B-Movie Kraken
****

Karma: 1402
Posts: 11156



« Reply #10 on: July 19, 2004, 12:41:41 PM »

Then advertise it as such. If it's any good, people won't need to be tricked into watching it.

I can't believe I'm even participating in this discussion, since debate is exactly what the idiots at Sci-fi want, and it's not worth it. But when you compare anything by Christopher Guest to this crap, it's hard to sit still.

Logged

---------------------
"Join me in the abyss of savings."
Toukee
Guest
« Reply #11 on: July 19, 2004, 12:59:44 PM »

yeah - but you are debating it!

That's the point! That's what "they" wanted - and it's ok because all of entertainment IS a business...a movie sets out to make money, and nothing more. It doesn't matter if the absolute greatest piece of literature on Earth is sitting (in screenplay form) in the hands of some Hollywood producer, that great piece of literature will not be made into a movie unless it is believed that a profit will result from the project.

That's how all entertainment works...so that thing that the SciFi channel aired was meant to generate publicity and ultimately profit. There isn't anything wrong with that - it caused you and I to have this discussion, Andy (sorry for being so informal) so it was successful.

-and I prefer anything by Christopher Guest, too - but I still like entertainment with a "supernatural overtone" to it. I'm a sucker for any sort of documentary dealing with ghosts, but I also know that all of these types of shows are fake to some extent...because nobody has ever been able to prove the existence of the supernatural (I even think they made that point somewhere in  "The Buried Secret of M. Night Shyamalan" too) - and it is a valid point....no documentary has ever captured any "real" footage of a ghost on film.  I know that but I still love anything supernatural that airs on the Discovery Channel and I even watch those "America's Most Haunted Places" shows on the Travel Channel.

We watch that stuff because we like to be scared, even when common sense tells us it's all fake.....

Are you upset because you absolutely KNOW beyond the shadow of a doubt that "The Buried Secret of M. Night Shyamalan" was just fiction?

I mean - would you have liked it better if it tried to actually present itself as being "more real" or actually probable in some way?
Logged
Acidburn
Bad Movie Lover
***

Karma: 4
Posts: 201


When I was your age, television was called Books!


« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2004, 01:13:40 PM »

Did you ever see anything about any other movie that was made for suspense having a disclamer saying "This movie is in no way true, it is a work of fiction" The answer is no!  They should not have to announce anything, it was made for the simple reason to get people curious about Night's movies and maybe nudge them to go and see 'The Village'
Spiderman never said anything about not being true.  Maybe somewhere out there is someone who really thinks that Parker is a real guy that really got bit by a spider and now has all of these powers.   They should not have to make it so that  people who are gullable(sp)  enough to think this is real, are not tricked.
Logged

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The flowers are still standing...
Toukee
Guest
« Reply #13 on: July 19, 2004, 01:28:52 PM »

in answer to this:

Did you ever see anything about any other movie that was made for suspense having a disclamer saying "This movie is in no way true, it is a work of fiction" The answer is no!


I've seen it the other way around.

The movie "Fargo" (written and directed by the Coen Brothers and starring Francis McDormand and William H Macy) starts out with a disclaimer that the events in the movie are entirely based on a true story...only some time later (like years after the movie had been released) they revealed that there was no "true story" and it was completely a work of fiction. They explained that the use of the "true story disclaimer" at the beginning of the film was just a way to set the tone that they wanted. They believed that the audience would accept certain things more easily if they believed the film had been based on an actual event.

When I first learned that there was no "true story" from which "Fargo" was based, it didn't bother me at all...it's a great movie (one of my favorites, in fact) and learning that the Coen Brothers had faked their disclaimer just makes the movie a little more interesting, I guess.

I don't have any idea what my point is....I guess I'm still just saying "Entertainment is Entertainment"
Logged
AndyC
Global Moderator
B-Movie Kraken
****

Karma: 1402
Posts: 11156



« Reply #14 on: July 19, 2004, 01:40:49 PM »

Nope, I just feel people were led to believe they were getting something else, perhaps some real dirt on the director. As it is, I'd say they got something better, but that's not really the point. Besides being dishonest, it plays on morbid curiosity.

On the other side of the coin, I'd be more likely to watch something that was simply billed as a scary story than I would something suggesting that it's going to give me the "buried secret" of some celebrity.

Can't say I'm really bothered by any of it. It's harmless enough. I just don't like what it says about human nature.

Logged

---------------------
"Join me in the abyss of savings."
Pages: [1] 2 3
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Movies  |  Bad Movies  |  Scifi Lies to us once again... « previous next »
    Jump to:  


    RSS Feed Subscribe Subscribe by RSS
    Email Subscribe Subscribe by Email


    Popular Articles
    How To Find A Bad Movie

    The Champions of Justice

    Plan 9 from Outer Space

    Manos, The Hands of Fate

    Podcast: Todd the Convenience Store Clerk

    Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!

    Dragonball: The Magic Begins

    Cool As Ice

    The Educational Archives: Driver's Ed

    Godzilla vs. Monster Zero

    Do you have a zombie plan?

    FROM THE BADMOVIES.ORG ARCHIVES
    ImageThe Giant Claw - Slime drop

    Earth is visited by a GIANT ANTIMATTER SPACE BUZZARD! Gawk at the amazingly bad bird puppet, or chuckle over the silly dialog. This is one of the greatest b-movies ever made.

    Lesson Learned:
    • Osmosis: os·mo·sis (oz-mo'sis, os-) n., 1. When a bird eats something.

    Subscribe to Badmovies.org and get updates by email:

    HOME B-Movie Reviews Reader Reviews Forum Interviews TV Shows Advertising Information Sideshows Links Contact

    Badmovies.org is owned and operated by Andrew Borntreger. All original content is © 1998 - 2014 by its respective author(s). Image, video, and audio files are used in accordance with the Fair Use Law, and are property of the film copyright holders. You may freely link to any page (.html or .php) on this website, but reproduction in any other form must be authorized by the copyright holder.