Bad Movie Logo
"A website to the detriment of good film"
Custom Search
HOMEB-MOVIE REVIEWSREADER REVIEWSFORUMINTERVIEWSUPDATESABOUT
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 08:34:29 AM
713399 Posts in 53059 Topics by 7725 Members
Latest Member: wibwao
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Movies  |  Bad Movies  |  80's action reviews « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: 80's action reviews  (Read 5047 times)
Master Blaster
Guest
« on: November 29, 2004, 10:41:30 AM »

A collection of 80's action film reviews. I nearly blew something out trying not to laugh in my cubicle last week while reading these. I thought it might be of interest for those of us who have already read all the reviews on this site.  

http://www.ruthlessreviews.com/80saction/80saction.html
Logged
Mr. Hockstatter
Guest
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2004, 01:27:24 PM »

One-third movie reviews, two-thirds sanctimonious left-wing political rant.

How entertaining.
Logged
Fearless Freep
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 15
Posts: 2328


« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2004, 02:10:44 PM »

I read the intro and a few of the reviews and I was pretty unimpressed.

One thing I like about Nathan and Andrew (and Ken and Liz and a few others) is a willingness to get into the movie and take it on it's own terms and then criticize it or analyze it or enjoy it on those terms.  Andrew in particular seems to take a general view of 'were the elements of the movie fun, no matter how stupid they were?'.  Nathan  generaly takes more of an approach of 'do the elements of the story actually hold together in a sort of logical or consistant manner?'  Both of these approaches, and  know I'm being painfully simplistic to both of them, allow one to look at a movies as 'enjoyable' rather than as 'good or bad',  It starts with a willingness to really get into the movie (as much as can be done which sometimes isn't that deep) and take the movie on it's own terms, rather than bringing in a preconceived view of what the movie is, or should be, or they'd like it to be.  This willngness to take the movie on it's own terms comes from a general appreciation that these things can actually be fun and a willingess to at least offer respect to the people who put the hard work into them (whether they keep that respect depends on the results, Mr Pyun).  In other words, they have a general fondness for the materiel

However, too many bad movie review sites fall into the trap of trying to be too funny with a certain nastiness that seems to be a point in it's own.  A sorta of bulliness in 'ha ha, this is a stupid movie so let's just spend an hour (or a column) ripping on it'  This is often coupled with a rather shallowness in actually watching and attemptng to 'get' the movie in the first place.  This is one reason I rarely go from Nathan's site to MonsterHunter.  I read a number of his reviews and they always struck me as more 'insult the movie for the sake of insulting it and stay above it without really trying to know what is going on'.  In particular, I gave up after his review of "The Great Escape" because I never really got the feeling that he actually watched he movie, at least not with anything approching understanding what the movie was about.

Which brings me back to Ruthless Reviews, or at least the 80s action movie summary.  I read a handful of them, mostly of movies I had already seen (Beastmaster, Toy Soldiers, a few Segal movies) and I definately got the impression that this wasn't a review of the movie but rather a rewview by someone who already had an agenda of what they wanted the movies to be about and saw the movie only through that lens and never really took the movies on their own terms and try to understand, much less empathize, with what they were about.  In particular, I thought the focus on 'homoeroticism' was more the reviews attempts to be snide or clever or a smart-aleck or something.  "Look at all these big, buff, macho guys, it's really gay softcore porn"  Face it, the reason all these movies had tough guys with ripped shirts and oiled pecs was because woman want 'em and men want to be like 'em.  Yes, in a way, it is a male fantasy, but not like the review seemed to be insisting was there.  The political angle simularly seemed to be the reviewers own political bent in choosing to interpret the movies in light of what he thought going in that the movie was going to be about, in a very simplistic manner, without much thought about what the movies were really about.

The whole thing got pretty boring after a few reviews, and more important;y, I got the impression that the reviewer doesn't really actually like to watch movies or doesn't bother to watch them for any reason other than to laugh at them in a cruel attempt to make himself feel clever



Post Edited (11-29-04 13:21)
Logged

=======================
Going places unmapped, to do things unplanned, to people unsuspecting
Master Blaster
Guest
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2004, 03:22:08 PM »

To each his own I suppose. I just thought the homoerotic jokes were funny. I didnt read too much into it after that.
Logged
ulthar
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 368
Posts: 4168


I AM serious, and stop calling me Shirley


WWW
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2004, 03:56:03 PM »

Wow, Freep, great review of b-movie reviewing.

B-movies are, to a lot of us I think, an art unto themselves.  Geez, when you think of what can be done with a very low budget, when it works it's amazing.  The director that relies on vision rather than million dollar overproduction is, much of the time, staying truer to the art of filmmaking.  I think, then, most of us give some leeway for when it doesn't work quite so well -  I guess one could say "well, at least they TRIED.'

Logged

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Professor Hathaway:  I noticed you stopped stuttering.
Bodie:      I've been giving myself shock treatments.
Professor Hathaway: Up the voltage.

--Real Genius
AndyC
Global Moderator
B-Movie Kraken
****

Karma: 1402
Posts: 11156



« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2004, 05:06:30 PM »

I got a few good laughs out of it, but I have to agree with Freep. Better to find the humour in each movie than attempt to apply the same jokes to every movie, even when they don't fit.

When the jokes did fit, they were funny, however. I've always thought the villain in Commando looked extremely gay. So much that I had to wonder if the filmmakers intended it that way. The homoerotic analysis worked in that case, but only because it really fit.

Of course, I don't see any homosexual undertones in these movies. You have to look at them as movies for our immature side, the part of us that used to hang out in bars with a bunch of other guys, being as crude and rude and stupid as we wanted to be. It's the part that still has us coming up with excuses like fishing trips to continue going out and doing that stuff, now that we've settled down. Our wives and families have enriched our lives, but they are also a civilizing influence on us. We'd never do half the stuff we used to do. Age and a career tend to have the same effect.

The action hero should really be looked at as a perpetual teenager, or at least someone with a teenage mentality. Freedom without responsibility. Occasional girlfriends, but nothing permanent enough to get in the way of doing guy stuff most of the time. The classic action hero is an uncommitted loner who does what he wants, has nothing to lose, fears nothing, strikes back at people when they make him mad, without any guilt or real consequences. And he lives like a slob while somehow managing to stay in shape and look good. You can see why he strikes a chord with young guys, and those who used to be - even if he doesn't really exist.

The action movie is escapist entertainment, and the hero is someone through whom you can get that vicarious thrill.

Or you can simply look at it from the point of view that the audience is primarily a bunch of boys paying money to see stuff get wrecked. They don't want love scenes, and the female characters, for the most part, aren't going to be slugging it out with the guys. So, we get a bit of eye candy, or someone for the villain to endanger, but no more.

Logged

---------------------
"Join me in the abyss of savings."
Master Blaster
Guest
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2004, 05:28:55 PM »

It might have been intentional when you think about it. The gay badguy in Commando I mean. The bad guy was Vernon Wells who also played the crazy mowhawk guy from Road Warrior. The Road Warrior character was gay. The leather and chainmail is an obvious attempt to capitalize off the road warrior look. They may have been trying to play off the homosexual aspect of that character as well. Either way It just came off as silly. Strangely enough Vernon Wells did Mighty Morphin Power Rangers a few years ago as a bad guy and they put him in a Road Warrior type getup again.
Logged
Dave Munger
Guest
« Reply #7 on: November 29, 2004, 05:44:54 PM »

There needs to be a term (I suppose the Germans probably already have a word) for negative criticism on grounds of a specious premise. Like "the plot of this porno makes no sense" or "the situations on this sitcom are unrealistic".
Logged
Master Blaster
Guest
« Reply #8 on: November 29, 2004, 07:02:05 PM »

Nobody likes my link. I shall hang my head in shame.
Logged
AndyC
Global Moderator
B-Movie Kraken
****

Karma: 1402
Posts: 11156



« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2004, 07:44:35 PM »

It's a possibility that they were trying to make him look gay. Either that, or they just put together a bunch of costume elements that seemed tough on their own, but came together in a Village People sort of way.

Didn't help that the moustache and haircut made him look like Freddy Mercury on steroids.



Post Edited (11-30-04 07:26)
Logged

---------------------
"Join me in the abyss of savings."
AndyC
Global Moderator
B-Movie Kraken
****

Karma: 1402
Posts: 11156



« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2004, 07:45:38 PM »

Anything that gets a discussion going is good - as long as it isn't political.

Logged

---------------------
"Join me in the abyss of savings."
Neville
Frightening Fanatic of Horrible Cinema
****

Karma: 142
Posts: 3050



« Reply #11 on: November 30, 2004, 09:28:43 AM »

Seen it before, I even put a link to the same place at the Jabootu board some time ago. I have to agree that the reviews are very political and that the "message" gets quite tiresome after a while (I should note that I mostly agree with it, so to people who don't it must verge on the unbearable), but I still think the site is great. That piece on "Commando" is histerical, and some others follow quite closely.

Logged

Due to the horrifying nature of this film, no one will be admitted to the theatre.
Master Blaster
Guest
« Reply #12 on: November 30, 2004, 10:31:38 AM »

Yeah the Commando review is funny as hell. I do have to admit some of the other stuff, especially if you look at the stuff other than the 80's action reviews can get boring, and there's some unnecesary political jabs thrown in there.
Logged
Dave Munger
Guest
« Reply #13 on: November 30, 2004, 08:21:53 PM »

I didn't check out the link until after commenting yesterday, and I'm just about to go back there now. I have special memories of some of those movies. I mean, I like the link.
Logged
Master Blaster
Guest
« Reply #14 on: December 01, 2004, 11:11:49 AM »

Yeah, me too. Me and my dad used to sneak off to the dollar cinema to see this stuff when I was a little kid. We'd go home and tell mom we were out watching Snow White or some crap.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
Badmovies.org Forum  |  Movies  |  Bad Movies  |  80's action reviews « previous next »
    Jump to:  


    RSS Feed Subscribe Subscribe by RSS
    Email Subscribe Subscribe by Email


    Popular Articles
    How To Find A Bad Movie

    The Champions of Justice

    Plan 9 from Outer Space

    Manos, The Hands of Fate

    Podcast: Todd the Convenience Store Clerk

    Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!

    Dragonball: The Magic Begins

    Cool As Ice

    The Educational Archives: Driver's Ed

    Godzilla vs. Monster Zero

    Do you have a zombie plan?

    FROM THE BADMOVIES.ORG ARCHIVES
    ImageThe Giant Claw - Slime drop

    Earth is visited by a GIANT ANTIMATTER SPACE BUZZARD! Gawk at the amazingly bad bird puppet, or chuckle over the silly dialog. This is one of the greatest b-movies ever made.

    Lesson Learned:
    • Osmosis: os·mo·sis (oz-mo'sis, os-) n., 1. When a bird eats something.

    Subscribe to Badmovies.org and get updates by email:

    HOME B-Movie Reviews Reader Reviews Forum Interviews TV Shows Advertising Information Sideshows Links Contact

    Badmovies.org is owned and operated by Andrew Borntreger. All original content is © 1998 - 2014 by its respective author(s). Image, video, and audio files are used in accordance with the Fair Use Law, and are property of the film copyright holders. You may freely link to any page (.html or .php) on this website, but reproduction in any other form must be authorized by the copyright holder.