|Copyright 1982 Z Films Inc.
| Reviewed by Andrew Borntreger on 'a long time ago'
- Margaret - Freaky fashion model. It's her sexual partners that the aliens kill off. Vaporized in the end.
- Adrian - Another psycho woman and Margaret's lover. She likes to make up songs about everything and they're none to easy on he ears. Dissolved by the aliens.
- Jimmy - Supposedly a dude (Played by the same girl as Margaret actually.) who hates Margaret. Dissolved by the aliens.
- Johann - German scientist who has been studying the aliens. Stabbed by Margaret.
- Sylvia - Jimmy's undersexed mom.
- Owen - Margaret's old professor who has spent some time in the sack with her. Has a glass pipette stuck through his head.
- Paul - Heroin addict. Gets the old glass pipette through the head then dissolves.
- The Aliens - Little guys who look like irritated eyeballs, they feed on heroin and a chemical produced in the human brain during orgasm.
|Few movies are specifically tailored for appeal to those on controlled substances, here's one film though. Heralded as a great work in science fiction and so on... ...well, my ass. There is no damn way this thing sits alongside Alien, Bladerunner, or The Thing. What you have is a great number of lifeless and disturbed people having sex with Margaret then dying. Aliens come to Earth looking for heroin but find that the chemicals produced by human brains during orgasm are even better. So they park their flying saucer, it's about two feet wide, on top Margaret's apartment and begin killing everyone who has sex with her. Then we have a barely understandable German scientist who is studying the aliens, at least he describes the plot to us. Throw in a crazy girlfriend and a few other weirdos to fill gaps. Margaret finally goes completely bonkers, it's difficult to find that special someone when everybody you sleep with dies, and gets vaporized. In addition, her face is always covered with smudged makeup, probably to disguise that the actress played Jimmy as well. My main problem with this movie wasn't that there are aliens. Nor that these aliens were after heroin or human brains. You just have all these dysfunctional relationships between the characters and nobody ever goes postal. Even talking to most of these people would be like getting beaten in the head with a sock full of quarters. |
|Things I Learned From This Movie:|| |
- Aliens are best represented by something which belongs in an eyedrop ad.
- Microphones make handy stethoscopes.
- Philosophy is less convincing when dispensed by a heroin addict.
- Telescopes are equipped with crosshairs. (Shoot the moon you say?)
- Some women take pride in being told they dress like a hooker.
- Junkies often mistake German scientists for police officers.
- The brain produces a chemical that tastes just like heroin during orgasm.
- Having your toes stomped doesn't hurt.
- A dozen people screaming at you to have an orgasm can be distracting.
- Don't have sex with someone if their partners mysteriously dissolve.
- 3 mins - Is that a flying saucer or two light covers?
- 8 mins - RANDOM ACT OF VIOLENCE AGAINST SHOES!
- 11 mins - Hey Adrian, shut the hell up! Do you make enough money to eat singing like that?
- 24 mins - What sort of goofy alien tracking telescope is that?
- 26 mins - Whoa! The "C" word! And I don't mean communist, try "see you next Tuesday." (Think about it.)
- 44 mins - Glass pippette through the brain huh? Yeah, we get that around here.
- 48 mins - Any particular reason you're sitting on a dead man's face Adrian?
- 58 mins - She's half your size Johann, kick her ass - good grief.
- 63 mins - Another guy died on top of you Margaret? Maybe you should get that thing checked.
- 84 mins - Why are you all looking for the body? You watched the um, guy I think, dissolve.
| ||Audio clips in wav format||SOUNDS||Starving actors speak out|| |
||Margaret: "Whether or not I like someone doesn't depend on what kind of genitals they have."
||Adrian: "Margaret is an uptight WASP c**t (Word bleeped here, even I don't throw this one around.) from Connecticut."
||Johann: "The most interesting fact we've found, these killings occured during sexual intercourse."
||Johann explaining to Margaret about aliens, heroin, and orgasms.
|Theme Song|| Listen to a clip from the soundtrack. |
| ||Click for a larger image||IMAGES||Scenes from the movie|| |
| ||Watch a scene||VIDEO||MPEG video files|| |
|Owen and Margaret were going to town when he became more lifeless than normal. Why does having a probe stuck into your brain kill you anyway? Wouldn't it just give some people a lobotomy?
| ||Leave a comment||EXTRAS||Buy the movie|| |
Reply #49. Posted on November 25, 2006, 04:09:03 PM by CHARLES ELIASON
Space aliens hooked on endorphins produced during sex, twelve year olds sniffing airplane glue, same thing. The premise is sound as well as realistic. the fun thing about the film is the vehicle that the director uses to present the characters and the imagery, that being space aliens hooked on endorphins, what a blast.
Its just fun, lighten up and enjoy it for what it is.
Pure and simple, Liquid Sky is what it is. To compare the film to any other does nothing but lead one away from any appreciation of that that is unique. Think about it.
Reply #50. Posted on November 25, 2006, 04:10:12 PM by Rebekah
Well, reading these comments has been fascinating, and I am now moved to tell my own Liquid Sky anecdote. I first heard of this movie back in 1983 (I was 21) on a Siskel & Ebert episode where they reviewed it and, yes, HATED it! But watching the clips they showed and hearing the plot described, my immediate reaction was "I have GOT to see this movie!" My first opportunity was a midnight showing at an ancient downtown movie house with the most dreadful sound system that prevented me from hearing/comprehending about half the dialogue, but I loved it anyway. In the late 80's I made a copy of a VHS version I'd rented [oops, don't tell anybody!] so I could have it for my very own.
It's a morality play of sorts, kind of a New York predecessor to "Less than Zero," wherein a bunch of young, shallow, narcissistic, sexually confused punkasses spend their free time (i.e., most of their waking hours) trying to numb themselves into oblivion. I guess it was a trend back then. Come to think of it, I was one of those punkasses for a time, and both LS and LtZ reflected our zeitgeist, but just really exaggerated it for dramatic effect.
Gah, didn't mean to get analytical there...anyway I loved its low budget, the incredibly intriguing one-of-a-kind plot, the weird music, the awkward acting and dialogue, the colors, the whole vibe of the thing, because it WAS so very different from most of the movies that were being put out, and 22 years later, it still is! And yes, I now own the DVD!
Reply #51. Posted on November 25, 2006, 04:09:49 PM by J.E.W.
I saw this movie in NYC in the Waverley in Greenwich Village in '85 while an alien of a different kind. I've since realised it was made by a bunch of visionaries living on a spaceship(NYC), off the coast of Amerikay. What else were they gonna do? The metaphor of the Empire State building as a hypo syringe is especially good. All those things happeniing to those people? May as well have been pages from the script of my own life.
Got into healinig 20 years later
Reply #52. Posted on November 25, 2006, 04:09:49 PM by antonia
I was born in 1982. My older sister was about 13 when I was born...but a few years later she saw this movie at a friend's house. She said it was the first art that really spoke to her. She completely identified with Margaret.
In the 90's she rented this movie over and over and showed it to anyone who would sit still (for a little while). Of course I saw it--in waves...it scared me a bit. When I was about 18 I watched it all the way through. I realized that although I don't identify with the character of Margaret, I look almost EXACTLY like her. Especially in the montage of pictures from her youth. I was extremely thin as a teenager, and those photos are identical with mine.
Maybe that's why this movie has a place among my favorites of The Third Man, and Annie Hall. Maybe it's because I'm an artist. Whatever the reason, I see this as a subtle masterpiece and I'm glad to find my comrades here. ;)
Reply #53. Posted on May 30, 2006, 05:20:59 PM by Virginia Plane
I like this movie a lot but then again I have very minority opinions on a lot of SF/fantasy movies, for example I think Blade runner is MASSIVELY overrated.
|Re: Liquid Sky
Reply #54. Posted on June 05, 2007, 11:16:21 PM by Charlie
I also really, really like 'Liquid Sky.' I also was prompted to cybersearch "where is she now?" info on Anne Carlisle without success. I liked Adrian's impromptu "You're Going to Hell" ("your lies, your lies") number even more than "Rhythm Box." I also liked the sound morphing of the reporter's questions. The movie is one of my favorites!
|Re: Liquid Sky
Reply #55. Posted on December 14, 2007, 12:28:02 AM by Dave
I'll never EVER understand how anyone can like this. This was so painful, stupid, cheap, pointless, annoying, trashy, garbage. The music was the worst. A waste of perfectly good film, time, and money. 500,000$?!? 500,000$ to make this stuff?!? That money could have helped starving children. But no, instead, some cheap independent filmmakers decided to get high and film this trash.
The worst is all of the positive comments. Hey, you Liquid Sky lovers, why don't you justify why you liked this garbage for a change, hein? You keep telling us haters that we're totally wrong without giving any reasons. Why don't you backup your sh*t, because I'm 100% positive that this is a complete waste, from start to finish.
Part of me thinks that Liquid Sky lovers aren't even serious. They're just saying they liked it to disagree, or to be different (or to annoy). Honestly, I can't imagine anyone liking this. It's like the visual equivalent to Reed's Metal Machine Music (which was by the way, highly drug-influenced as well). Drugs = bad work. Everyone knows that.
Unless someone can precisely explain the significance of this film, let's all try to keep it with all the other trashy bad movies on this site, where it belongs. No one is ever going to resurrect this b*tch. THIS SH*T IS AWFUL DEAD.
|Re: Liquid Sky
Posted on December 15, 2007, 10:56:45 PM by ireland4ever
Used to watch this movie years ago. Used to have the album too. Don't know what made me think of it the other day. Googled it & found way more than I thought I ever would. I think the cool thing about this movie was that it was just very different. Weird - yes, obviously. Bad - yeah, bad at times, from what I remember. Annoying synth music - sure, but, for me, at least, as this was not a genre of music I was accustomed to, it was also gratifyingly.....well, different. Made me step outside my box, so to speak (no pun intended to the memorable Rhythm Box song) Sometimes, you just have to do/see/listen to something different. Would love to be able to walk into Blockbuster like I used to and get a copy off the shelf & watch it for old times sake, but I bet I can't (heck, our local Blockbusters didn't even have a copy of Somewhere In Time when I checked a few weeks back.....guess I've been walking down movie memory lane lately....and, oh what different ends of the street those two movies are on, eh?!). Anyway, I just think it is such an 80's statement. Do you want these characters as your children's role models? No, you might not even want your children to EVER see it
But, hey, what's a little warped voyueristic 80's fun once in a while among the adults who were there firsthand.....it's just a movie (or, as we are teaching my daughter about what she sees on TV/movies.....they are all just playing dress up).
Enjoy - don't take it so seriously.....do you think the people who made it or were in it did?
|Pages: 1 ... 5 6  8 9 ||
|Badmovies.org is owned and operated by Andrew Borntreger. All original content is © 1998 - 2013 by its respective author(s). Image, video, and audio files are used in accordance with Fair Use, and are property of the film copyright holders. You may freely link to any page (.html or .php) on this website, but reproduction in any other form must be authorized by the copyright holder.|