In the http://www.badmovies.org/sideshows/articles/how-to-find-a-bad-movie.html (http://www.badmovies.org/sideshows/articles/how-to-find-a-bad-movie.html) How to find a bad movie guide, Andrew pointed out that being a sci-fi original production counts. What about Fearnet? Fearnet has made some pretty bad movies, and that's all they seem to play. Don't believe me? Go to fearnet.com and watch a movie, you'll want to slam your head ino the computer screen they're so bad.
Fearnet doesnt make that garbage they just play it. i was so excited for that channel and now they either just have the same old s**t on or garbage like you are talking about.
Fearnet does make a few original productions but they are hard to come by, I believe Catacombs is their first. They do a series of seven minute movies sometimes too.
Andrew does not mess up. The rest of the world messes up around him.
Attribute it to both my general taste in films, and also the impossibility of covering every base when you do a short bit like that article. I do sometimes review independent films that were made on a thin shoestring of a budget, but I tend to stick to stuff that probably had a small film crew (at the very least). From what I know of Fearnet, they fall below that "low tide mark" that I usually stay above, and they often run a mix of stuff that was probably easy to license (because it is so bad, and nobody else wants it).
Bear in mind that this is really just a send up to Fearnet, which I don't see mentioned too often. Especially Andrew, this title isn't really like, "OHHHH Andrew messed up!" but more like, hmmmm "I don't here so much about Fearnet and they have terrible terrible movies, I wonder how I can point this out." However, you make perfect sense deciding to stay above a certain line, I have respect for that, and tattoos that look like barbed wire.