http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,534970,00.html (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,534970,00.html).
I can't really see any team wanting to have the stigma attached to them of what Michael Vick truly represents. I don't think he's one single bit remorseful of what he did but that's just me. What do you all think about this? I'm kind of surprised the NFL went this route. I thought he would get banned for life.
(http://stateoftheline.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/vick.jpg)
I think what he did was horrible but he did his time. Athletes do things all the time and it doesnt stop them from playing. They do drugs, beat their wives, drive drunk...
I won't be watching him, that's all I can say.
He did his time, paid his debt to society. I don't like him and despise what he did, but I believe once you've served your punishment, you should be free to start over with a clean slate.
Eh, why not. Footballers in England punch people and kill people, an spend about 2 hours in a cell... :lookingup: