Wow... just wow. Not sure what to say about this. I'll leave it up to the other forum members to come up with catchy one liners.
http://www.myfoxtwincities.com/dpp/news/Waseca-Man-Charged-in-Attempted-Sex-Toy-Bombing-jan-6-2011 (http://www.myfoxtwincities.com/dpp/news/Waseca-Man-Charged-in-Attempted-Sex-Toy-Bombing-jan-6-2011)
Waseca Man Gives Ex Explosive-Rigged Vibrator
Updated: Friday, 07 Jan 2011, 7:21 AM CST
Published : Thursday, 06 Jan 2011, 2:52 PM CST
by Leif Knutson / FOX 9 News
WASECA, Minn. - A Waseca, Minn. man is facing up to 13 years in prison for modifying a sex toy into an explosive device in order to "blow up" former female roommates after being kicked out of the residence .
Terry Allen Lester, 37, had recently been staying with two women in Waseca who had asked him to move out after the property owner had learned of the living situation and ordered him out. On Dec. 29 Lester left the residence, but left several bags of property behind.
The two remaining women looked through his belongings and found a vibrator that had been loaded with gunpowder, BB shot and buckshot and appeared to be wired to a battery port in order for it to explode. It was found inside of a coffee can labeled "Christmas Gifts."
Lester said he was going to give it to one of the women because his relationship with them had ended badly. He intended to trigger the device while inserted into one of the females and "blow them up."
A total of three vibrators were found -- the altered one, as well as various tools and explosives, one pink with "Merry X-mas b***h" written on it with black ink.
The former roommates called police and the Bloomington bomb squad was brought to the scene to dismantle and dispose of the devices.
The investigation found Lester had notified one of the women he put a bomb in the house, but nothing of the sort was located other than the rigged sex toy.
Lester faces felony charges of Possession/Making/Storing an Explosive/Incendiary Device and Terroristic Threats with such a device.
If convicted, Lester faces jail time as well as up to $33,000 in fines.
This story originally published on MyFoxTwinCities.com
I'm not sure that's how the women intended to bang themselves..
Quote from: retrorussell on January 07, 2011, 02:43:58 PM
I'm not sure that's how the women intended to bang themselves..
To say nothing of what would have happened if one of the women would have rubbed the other the wrong way...
This story blows . . . :teddyr:
Bet she had an explosive orgasm. :lookingup:
Not to mention what would have happened if she inserted it "this side up"...
"No no no. I said use the vibrator to get her off, not set her off."
Actually, for some women, a black powder charge might be just enough to bring them to climax.
Well, the ladies were complaining of not getting enough bang when they had sex. Unfortunately, he took the word "bang" literally.
:lookingup: Oh please. This whole thread's a bomb.
It's looks like our victim's Christmas gift this year is......
*Puts on sunglasses*
A crotch rocket!
*Pans over the city of Miami*
The Who: YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!
Let's get it on!
really bad idea
Quote from: Allhallowsday on January 08, 2011, 08:12:56 PM
:lookingup: Oh please. This whole thread's a bomb.
Not to mention the considerable expense the man went thru to make the device. He was definitely dedicated to making sure she got the most bang for his buck.....
That'd be like if someone put plague bacteria on my hand.
That'll make your liver quiver.
Well, this just blew my mind.
Gives new meaning to "FIRE IN THE HOLE!"
I guess what goes in really does come out.
This is like if Dr. Phibes met John Doe from Se7en :tongueout:
The title is misleading. Did the man give an explosive-rigged vibrator to his ex-girlfriend? Or, did he give someone an ex explosive-rigged vibrator, meaning it was once an explosive-rigged vibrator but now it's not?
Hmmmmmmmm.
kinky
Quote from: Flick James on January 12, 2011, 01:49:13 PM
The title is misleading. Did the man give an explosive-rigged vibrator to his ex-girlfriend? Or, did he give someone an ex explosive-rigged vibrator, meaning it was once an explosive-rigged vibrator but now it's not?
Hmmmmmmmm.
Neither. BTM stuttered.
:teddyr:
The title is misleading. He didn't give it to anyone. He made it and had it in his possession, and he said he intended to give it to her, but he didn't actually do it.
Not saying he wouldn't have (although I have my doubts), but I hate when headlines are tweaked to make them more exciting while intentionally giving the reader a false impression.
The headline wouldn't grab you nearly as much if it said "EXPLOSIVE VIBRATOR FOUND IN MAN'S POSSESSIONS; SAID HE MADE IT FOR EX."