Badmovies.org Forum

Movies => Bad Movies => Topic started by: InformationGeek on November 05, 2011, 10:20:29 PM

Title: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: InformationGeek on November 05, 2011, 10:20:29 PM
*Repeatedly and slowly bangs head against the wall.*

You got to be f**king kidding me!  This exists?!?  Why?!  Was Aslyum too busy with the sequel for Mega Shark to make this?  I mean, come on!  We've reached the bottom of the barrel once more folks.  You've been warned.  We have another cash in film, this time based off Zombieland, but with just zombie strippers.  There is nothing else to be said.

Trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gwn3rpTGQ-w

IMDB Page:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1710900/ (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1710900/)

It's on Netflix, where I ran into it.  You know what to do.  Sickos.   :tongueout:
Title: Re: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: indianasmith on November 06, 2011, 12:07:42 AM
They seem awfully .  . . clothed, for strippers.
Title: Re: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: bob on November 06, 2011, 12:14:48 AM
maybe they're strippers who object to nudity  :question:
Title: Re: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: Archivist on November 06, 2011, 02:18:18 AM
That trailer was two minutes of my life I will never get back.  Spare me the whole movie!
Title: Re: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: Mofo Rising on November 06, 2011, 03:45:03 AM
Sickos? The entire reason I got into bad movies was for the promise of bear breasts. (Excuse me, I meant BARE breasts. There would be a lot of questions raised if I admitted I was into bear breasts.)

There's a sub-genre of film that deals in strippers who never take off all their clothes. Part of that weird reality in movie-dom where people have sex without ever taking off all their clothes. Perfectly reasonable to have sex wrapped in a towel. Not weird at all.

I don't think people understand exploitation cinema. It's the sleaze that sells movies. If you already have an R-rating for gore, why not throw in a crap load of nudity? You have an R-rated movie! Nudity will not change that fact! Nudity will, however, sell a lot more copies. It doesn't matter if you're actresses are less than stellar beauties. Make them naked and you will make back the money you put into it.

Sorry, got off topic there. I'm not going to watch Stripperland. Looks awful.
Title: Re: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: InformationGeek on November 06, 2011, 07:22:32 AM
Quote from: Mofo Rising on November 06, 2011, 03:45:03 AM
Sickos? The entire reason I got into bad movies was for the promise of bear breasts. (Excuse me, I meant BARE breasts. There would be a lot of questions raised if I admitted I was into bear breasts.)

There's a sub-genre of film that deals in strippers who never take off all their clothes. Part of that weird reality in movie-dom where people have sex without ever taking off all their clothes. Perfectly reasonable to have sex wrapped in a towel. Not weird at all.

I don't think people understand exploitation cinema. It's the sleaze that sells movies. If you already have an R-rating for gore, why not throw in a crap load of nudity? You have an R-rated movie! Nudity will not change that fact! Nudity will, however, sell a lot more copies. It doesn't matter if you're actresses are less than stellar beauties. Make them naked and you will make back the money you put into it.

Sorry, got off topic there. I'm not going to watch Stripperland. Looks awful.

I was just kidding around.   I was just trying to sound over the top in my over all reaction and final statements about movie.  I'm sorry if I offend you.   :bluesad:
Title: Re: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: Flick James on November 06, 2011, 10:49:19 AM
I didn't get the impression Mofo was offended.
Title: Re: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: WingedSerpent on November 06, 2011, 10:53:52 AM
I don't know if that looks so bad.  I might want to see it at least once.  The main problem comes from doing a parody of something that was a comedy to begin with.  Those usually don't work.
Title: Re: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: Flick James on November 06, 2011, 11:07:58 AM
It's Asylum. We know what we're getting. If you want that, then go for it.
Title: Re: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: Chainsawmidget on November 06, 2011, 12:42:57 PM
It could use more nudity, but otherwise it looks nicely stupid.
Title: Re: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: Mofo Rising on November 06, 2011, 01:37:08 PM
Quote from: InformationGeek on November 06, 2011, 07:22:32 AM
I was just kidding around.   I was just trying to sound over the top in my over all reaction and final statements about movie.  I'm sorry if I offend you.   :bluesad:

No worries, InformationGeek. I had my tongue planted pretty firmly in cheek there. In other words, I also was goofing around. No offense taken.

I do, however, take offense to a movie about strippers with no nudity. Why?
Title: Re: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: InformationGeek on November 06, 2011, 06:40:39 PM
Quote from: Mofo Rising on November 06, 2011, 01:37:08 PM
Quote from: InformationGeek on November 06, 2011, 07:22:32 AM
I was just kidding around.   I was just trying to sound over the top in my over all reaction and final statements about movie.  I'm sorry if I offend you.   :bluesad:

No worries, InformationGeek. I had my tongue planted pretty firmly in cheek there. In other words, I also was goofing around. No offense taken.

I do, however, take offense to a movie about strippers with no nudity. Why?

Okay.  I had upset a friend on another website I go to by accident and I didn't want a repeat of that here.

Speaking of offenses, I take offense to a movie with the word orgy and vampire in the title and there is neither things in a film, but that's another story.
Title: Re: Stripperland (2010)
Post by: WildHoosier09 on November 06, 2011, 08:45:22 PM
They should expect a cease and desist letter soon from the legal team at "Zombie Strippers" (2008)

at least in Zombie strippers (starring Jena Jameson, really, would anyone recognize her with her clothes on?) there was a never ending parade of nudity. Made up a little bit for the lack of storyline or acting.