Badmovies.org Forum

Movies => Bad Movies => Topic started by: Evan3 on April 28, 2002, 08:26:15 PM

Title: ACH T3/ Dracula
Post by: Evan3 on April 28, 2002, 08:26:15 PM
Terminator 3 is making the bad terminator a female in the new movie. WHY?>???
 Is James Cameron even doing this one? If not I bet it ends up on this site? Plus,
have any of you seen Christopher Lee (Sauroman in LOTR) Dracula movies. Now those are some fulfilling cheesy movies that I didn feel bad renting!!! Highly reccomended, and lots of boobs!!!
Title: Re: Lee as Dracula
Post by: Andrew on April 28, 2002, 09:34:11 PM
I've always loved the Hammer Dracula films and Lee is one of my favorite vampires.  Heck, even his performance in "The Wicker Man" was quite good.  Where else can you watch Lee gleefully singing as... (ooops, spoiler).

Andrew
Title: Re: Lee as Dracula
Post by: Lee on April 28, 2002, 11:31:51 PM
I've allways thought Lee was one of the better Draculas. He allways put on quite a performance. It helped that he had alot of great people working with him but he was a big contrabution. Also a plus is that the movie doesn't try to make a Dracula look like a wuss(something that hurt Copala's version).
Title: Re: Lee as Dracula
Post by: Flangepart on April 29, 2002, 10:18:07 AM
Hey, Chris Lee is always good, just like Peter Cushing. They are pro's pro's. No matter how bad the script, they always give thier best. No slackers they.
Title: Re: ACH T3/ Dracula
Post by: Mofo Rising on April 29, 2002, 03:06:55 PM
Evan3 wrote:
>
> Terminator 3 is making the bad terminator a female in
> the new movie. WHY?>???



Why not?
Title: Re: Lee as Dracula
Post by: AndyC on April 29, 2002, 08:26:40 PM
Definitely a big part of the success of the Hammer films. The actors did not treat their roles as cheesy B-movie parts. They didn't camp it up or phone in a performance. They took it as seriously as any role, and put the appropriate effort into their performances. It shows.
Title: Re: ACH T3/ Dracula
Post by: Chris1 on May 01, 2002, 09:03:16 PM
I hope she's hot not no muscle bound steroids mutant that looks like a man can anybody say YUCK!!
Title: Re: ACH T3/ Dracula
Post by: john on May 02, 2002, 01:01:26 AM
>Is James Cameron even doing this one?

 Nope. They couldn't even get Edward Furlong back to play John, they've got some other guy as him. It also has different writers.

 Can you say: "Gonna suck"?

>I've allways thought Lee was one of the better Draculas. He allways put on quite
>a performance. It helped that he had alot of great people working with him but he
>was a big contrabution. Also a plus is that the movie doesn't try to make a
>Dracula look like a wuss(something that hurt Copala's version).

 I've always thought the Frank Lagella version was pretty good. I hated the Coppola one.
Title: Re: ACH T3/ Dracula
Post by: AndyC on May 02, 2002, 02:02:21 AM
Not having Edward Furlong probably would have helped T2. Thought he made John Connor look like too much of a wuss.

In a somewhat related topic, has anybody else heard a rumour that Arnie was going to be playing the gunslinger in a remake of Westworld?
Title: Re: ACH T3/ Dracula
Post by: BoyScoutKevin on May 04, 2002, 03:20:31 PM
Yes, it's true. A remake of "Westwordl" w/ Arnold is in development. I am glad to hear he is to take the part originally played by Yul Brynner. That makes more sense for him to play that part, then the parts played by Richard Benjamin and James Brolin. Enjoy!
Title: Re: ACH T3/ Dracula
Post by: john on May 08, 2002, 10:15:25 AM
I thought Arnie had a 'no bad guys' rule for the parts he took now?
Title: Re: ACH T3/ Dracula
Post by: Jay O'Connor on May 08, 2002, 12:38:46 PM
Other than "Terminator", what bad guys has Arnold played?
Title: Re: ACH T3/ Dracula
Post by: john on May 10, 2002, 01:25:49 AM
None that I know of, but when Terminator 2 came out, I heard that he'd made it a condition of doing the movie that his terminator be a good guy because he didn't want to play a bad guy ever again.