Badmovies.org Forum

Movies => Bad Movies => Topic started by: Ted C on June 22, 2014, 11:25:56 PM

Title: Curse of the Dragon Slayer
Post by: Ted C on June 22, 2014, 11:25:56 PM
So this is new on Netflix. Or at least to me it's new.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtrT0an7cME

The production value isn't half bad, and this was financed by Kickstarter. Good costuming, decent acting, plot full of holes, awful fight choreography. Overall, it was pretty fun.
Title: Re: Curse of the Dragon Slayer
Post by: WingedSerpent on June 26, 2014, 07:17:45 PM
Looks worth a watch.  Somewhere on the level of those old Hercules the Legendary Journeys movies or the Dungeon and Dragons straight to video sequels.

I do love the fact that almost anyone can make a movie of some real quality these days.   
Title: Re: Curse of the Dragon Slayer
Post by: Jim H on July 04, 2014, 11:11:18 AM
It's definitely better than the D&D straight to video sequel.  I watched this because of this thread, and I enjoyed it.  Pretty excellent makeup, entertaining story and characters, mostly pretty good performances.  Worth a watch for fantasy fans who want something that feels like one of the 80s fantasy films (Beastmaster, Deathstalker, etc), that's the best comparison I can make. 

I'll say by the way I thought the fight choreography actually wasn't bad.  It's not as good as something like LOTR, but I thought it compared well to most of the stuff from the 80s, and it probably had 1/30th the budget. 

Biggest letdowns - production feels small, even though it aims high.  Few big shots, more like a TV production.  Also, there's a "horde" thing which is obviously mean to be big, but is visibly only like 8 guys.  Also, the lack of lighting equipment for the outdoor shots (reflectors, highlight lights, etc) sometimes makes it look a little "home movieish" in some shots. 

Also, if you look at the Netflix reviews, I love the people complaining about how fake the CG monster at the end looks.  It's pretty clearly NOT CG.
Title: Re: Curse of the Dragon Slayer
Post by: Dr. Whom on July 07, 2014, 04:56:24 AM
Judging by the trailer, that looks at least as good as anything that Uwe Boll has ever done.
Title: Re: Curse of the Dragon Slayer
Post by: BoyScoutKevin on July 16, 2014, 05:27:49 PM
Axes? Bows and arrows? Clubs? Guns? Swords? Check!

Dragons? Vampires? Wereanimals? Double check!

People bumping into trees? Terrible SFX? Triple check!

I'm there. It looks like a terrible film, but also a terribly fun film to watch. The kind that I wish would come soon to a theater near where I live, but never does. I'll have to see if I can pick it up on TV sometime while I am on vacation.
Title: Re: Curse of the Dragon Slayer
Post by: Flangepart on July 17, 2014, 08:20:16 AM
That reminds me of some of the more fun MST3Ks as well. Riffable, yet not leaving any nasty side effects like say, MANOS or STARFIGHTERS.