Poll
Question:
Which monster was worse?
Option 1: The giant claw.
votes: 0
Option 2: Reptilicus.
votes: 3
Ok, the giant claw gets razzed for having a rather funny looking monster and deservedly so.
But by ghawd the titular monster in reptilicus was pretty laughable looking too and itcs time for a showdown
Which monster do you think was worse?
Now personally i'm going with reptilicus. First off it had those stupider-than-a-trump-supporter tiny wings on it that just looked idiotic. Also at least the giant claw's face had some articulation and movied a little. The face on the reptilicus model was utterly immobile and rigid.
The scene where the giant claw was eating people was at least a little scary. The scene where reptilicus ate a cardboard cartoon cutout of a man was groan inducing.
So that's my says what's yours?
(http://www.midnightonly.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Giant-Claw-7.jpg)
The Giant Claw at least has a somewhat interesting design. It's given exaggerated features, a goofy look with its big eyes, large nostrils, and extra long neck. It has personality.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjblN45VEAAWqzV.jpg)
Repticillicius is just a standard snake monster with fins attached. Even if it was done with a more convincing style, like stop motion animation, it lacks a lot of distinct visual components that would make it a memorable monster.