Badmovies.org Forum

Movies => Bad Movies => Topic started by: Private Joker on June 08, 2002, 09:01:22 PM

Title: Lowest budget movie ever?
Post by: Private Joker on June 08, 2002, 09:01:22 PM
I'd say the lowest budget movie I can think of would be Eraserhead.  It was made for $10,000 dollars.  

Any cheaper flicks?
Title: Re: Lowest budget movie ever?
Post by: Brian Ringler on June 08, 2002, 10:04:11 PM
Depends on what level you are looking at, My friends and I have made movies for a lot cheaper than $10,000
Title: Re: Lowest budget movie ever?
Post by: Mofo Rising on June 08, 2002, 11:02:52 PM
Brian's right.  Depends what you're looking for.

EL MARIACHI, Robert Rodriguez first full length feature was filmed for $7,000.  (Of course, distribution must have cost much more than that.)  It's the most competent cheap movie I can think of.

Then there's Kansas City's Todd Sheets.  Somehow a copy of his movie MOONCHILD ended up at the library I work at (Phoenix Public).  I can't believe that it cost more than $10,000 to make.  It's not as good as EL MARIACHI, but I thought it was entertaining.

And let's not get into my CITIZEN KANE tribute involving a pile of puke. . .
Title: Re: Lowest budget movie ever?
Post by: Lee on June 08, 2002, 11:41:55 PM
I'm convinced that the entire budget for The Blair Witch Project was $100. They didn't even have a trpod for crying out loud!!!!!
Title: Re: Lowest budget movie ever?
Post by: StatCat on June 09, 2002, 10:41:35 AM
Meat Market 1 & 2 cost about $2,000 each to make but they are shot on video movies. Lowest I can think of.
Title: Re: Lowest budget movie ever?
Post by: Pete B6K on June 09, 2002, 11:09:15 AM
Redneck Zombies couoldnt have cost more than $100 to make, im sure. Crappy film too.
Title: Re: Lowest budget movie ever?
Post by: Will on June 09, 2002, 01:21:26 PM
Blair Witch cost about $100,000.....gotta remember, a lot of that was shot on film stock, which is really expensive. Redneck Zombies cost about $50,000, most of that going to effects.

I made a shot-on-video feature-length movie called Quaker College Massacre when I was in college......since I got to use the cameras and editing equipment for free the whole thing ended up only costing about $200 spent over the course of 3 1/2 years of on again off again shooting and editing.
Title: Re: Lowest budget movie ever?
Post by: Chris K. on June 09, 2002, 10:42:18 PM
Larry Buchanan's film THE NAKED WITCH budgeted for $8,000 on 16mm. I gotta tell you, it's better than his AIP-TV remakes which were all funded $10,000 each.

Oh, and Andy Milligan's first feature LIZ (a.k.a. THE PROMISCUOUS SEX) cost $7,500 on 16mm. For a lost feature, I heard some film critics gave the film a rave.
Title: Re: Lowest budget movie ever?
Post by: Nathan on June 10, 2002, 10:17:31 AM
Dirty Cop, No Donut reportedly cost a total of $200.  Shot-on-video, the director edited it by pressing "play" and "pause" on a VHS deck.

Nathan
Title: Re: Lowest budget movie ever?
Post by: john on June 10, 2002, 12:02:40 PM
What about a piece of crap movie called Boarding House? Really, really bad! A demonstration of telekinesis consisted of the guy staring at a vase on a small table until someone off camera starts shaking it, making the vase fall over.
Title: Re: Lowest budget movie ever?
Post by: Luke Bannon on July 02, 2002, 07:37:02 AM
Easy, some people in my school's attempt at a slasher film!