Godzilla: Caught in Bad Movies
by the Goji Corner
Everyone remembers their first Godzilla movie. It was funny, exciting and cool to watch. The problem is that as we all grew up, the movies never did. Sure, the costume changed and the special effects got better, but the core of the movies â€" the storyline, acting and overall direction of Godzilla film-making has yet to reach industry standards. With all the time and money Toho puts into a Godzilla production, you would think they cared about professionalism. Godzilla is such a great character, it’s a shame the people who hold his license can’t do anything creative.
At every Godzilla film my intention has been to catch a glimmer of hope. Maybe the acting has gotten better, or the movie script â€" it never happens. Truthfully, Godzilla is only a notch better than the Power Rangers. That’s what many kids have told me. Audiences have changed much since the first Godzilla film (1954). Today’s children are more aware of the entertainment industry and can find flaws with pinpoint accuracy. During my viewing of Godzilla 2000, I heard several kids say, “that’s just a man in a suit,†or “that’s so fake.â€
Despite criticism of Tri-Star’s recent Godzilla movie, it was far better than any Heisei (Japanese) Godzilla film. World-wide sales speak for themselves. But more importantly, a movie company finally approached Godzilla in a new innovative direction. The special effects were convincing, and the Godzilla design was refreshing. The modern feel of the movie created a sense of believability. Many arguments have focused on Tri-Star’s new Godzilla design, which isn’t constructive. Godzilla fanatics seem to have a problem with anyone doing something bold. In this case, bold was better.
The Heisei Godzilla films had poor acting, plot and direction. Much time was put into Godzilla himself which took away from all other aspects. While the G-suit improved, the movies didn’t. Godzilla 1985 had really bad acting, but the movie was still up to par with movies of that time. The next film, Godzilla vs. Biollante (1989) was a step in the right direction. The Godzilla design was far improved but the story lacked the usual. Also the tone of the movie was misleading. At times the mood turned serious then abruptly ended by something whimsical, especially in the Godzilla scenes. Needless to say, the musical score wasn’t very good. When Godzilla vs. King Ghidorah (1991) premiered, I figured the 90’s would have an impact on Godzilla’s future. I was wrong. This movie was cheesy, boring and had very, very bad acting, probably due to very, very bad directing. A similar fate awaited the Godzilla films that followed. I was most disturbed, however, by Godzilla vs. Destroyah (1995). This was supposed to be Godzilla’s finale, and it stunk. First of all, there was no indepth explanation of where, how and why Godzilla experiences meltdown. Then the fate of the whole world is left to the decision making of an annoying kid, who can’t even get into college. The other supposedly top notch scientists and military leaders meanwhile just sit around dumfounded by their inept roles. The lead scientist manages a few words like, “explain to me,†or “how?†With these men in charge, it’s no wonder Godzilla has run Japan amuck. Godzilla 2000 wasn’t a huge hit either. The critics went easy just because it was Godzilla. Many of the scenes should have been left on the cutting table. The audience sneered when Godzilla stomped on literally modeled streets while approaching Orga for their climactic battle. Also in this film, we learn that Godzilla is psychic or has very good eyesight. Yes... he knows who is trying to harm him just like we know exactly which ant stole our bread crumbs. The ending of this film is actually quite hilarious. Godzilla torches the whole city after someone comments that he is Japan’s savior.
Godzilla is a great character, but not being utilized in the best way. Read the comics, they’re actually very good. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a big Godzilla fan, that’s why I wrote this article. How many people do you know who care about something, just let it fall apart in front of them?
"Despite criticism of Tri-Star’s recent Godzilla movie, it was far better than any Heisei (Japanese) Godzilla film."
No it wasn't. The acting, plot, script, and direction were universally reviled by critics and audiences alike.
"World-wide sales speak for themselves."
The '98 movie had an enormous advertising campaign, which coupled with anticipation, got people into the theaters on opening weekends. Most of its money was made on opening weekends, then audiences avoided it like the plauge thereafter.
"But more importantly, a movie company finally approached Godzilla in a new innovative direction."
Yes, the direction of "let's remake the Beast from 20,000 Fathoms and slap the Godzilla name on it."
"The special effects were convincing, and the Godzilla design was refreshing."
The effects were below average for what it was. The baby Godzillas were obviously not walking on the floor most of the time. Godzilla himself was derivative, cobbled together from the T. rex from Jurassic park and the aliens from Alien: Resurrection.
"The modern feel of the movie created a sense of believability. "
No more believable than any other giant monster movie.
"Many arguments have focused on Tri-Star’s new Godzilla design, which isn’t constructive."
See above comments on the Godzilla design. Furthermore, the lack of a breath weapon is unforgivable. Radioactive breath *is* Godzilla. Godzilla without his breath is like Jason without his mask, Freddy without his glove, or Batman without his cape and cowl. It is *the* defining aspect of his character.
"Godzilla fanatics seem to have a problem with anyone doing something bold. In this case, bold was better."
You may call it bold, critics and plenty of audiences called it bad. People go to a Godzilla movie to see big monsters fighting and smashing stuff, not a bad romantic comedy with some giant monster scenes in it.
I agree on some of your points, but the '98 movie was just a plain bad film, all around, in every way.
My eyes have just gone blurry.
Anyways, there's one statement there that I'm compelled to argue with:
"Despite criticism of Tri-Star’s recent Godzilla movie, it was far better than any Heisei (Japanese) Godzilla film. World-wide sales speak for themselves. "
I strongly disagree with the common assumption that popularity means quality. The world we live in today is one where marketing is the lifeblood of mainstream media. I get into this debate a lot, being into punk/hardcore music and badmovies. I'll give you an example; the film 'Scary Movie'. It is extremely popular , and I'm sure most of us here are wise enough to tell you that it's a terrible terrible movie. I can say the same about alsmost the entire mainstream pop music market, but I'm sure lots will disagree with me on that one. The recent Godzilla film is also a perfect example. I really hated that film. Every time the film gives you the idea it is ending, but then comes back with a new godzilla/babies etc, I was extremely disappointed. The film was terribly contrived, plot devices didn't flow easily, but rather were forced into the film. Dialogue was uninteresting and unoriginal. Special effects in essence were good, but instead of being added to an exciting part of the film to enhance that excitement (a la Jurassic Park/Matrix/T2), it was put in to make a dull scene exciting, which inevitably failed. You also talk about Godzilla's redesign as a positive thing, but I felt as if this was part of the filmmakers attempts to aim this film a new audience, taking away all that would make the film familiar to fans of old Godzilla movies.
Sorry to be confrontational or whatever, but it is quite fun.
Pete
Damn, took me so long to write that, someone posted before me and made half my points redundant. Dagnabbit.
Pete
The American godzilla was crap pure and simple- leave it to the Japanese to work with godzilla and leave it to the US to work with kong (even though I kind of like toho's goofy kong.) Akira Tubo and Pete brought up points that I could say I agree with completely. This movie was not a new direction for godzilla but just a way for the American market to cash in with a monster that is nothing like godzilla but use it's popular name to their advantage. It was a ripoff of the Beast from 20,000 Fathoms with a giant cgi Iguana like dinosaur- hell I don't even want to consider it a godzilla movie in any sense. Godzilla made the suit battle nostalgic and toho is often looked down upon (now a days somewhat) for that but truthfully I think its a hell of a lot cooler to see actors battling it out in the old rubber suits. Computer effects I can say I really dislike for the most part when they are used to such an extent (look at Reptilian aka the new Yonggary and godzilla 98 for it's disasters.) What made godzilla and kaiju cool was the fact of the time spent into the suits and the models that were destroyed for me at least. It would definitely lose touch with me if it wasn't this way. I don really understand how you can just generalize every g film to "suck" anyway either.
While I was not a big fan of the Tri-Star Godzilla movie, I defend all my points because it was more professional and a step in the right direction. You must agree with me that Toho Godzilla movies are always lacking in terms of movie standards. Godzilla 1998 was the highest selling movie in Japan in 1998. The Japanese loved it, because it gave them a refreshing new idea. You can't discredit Tri-Star's vision just because you wanted to see a guy in a rubber suit. At least they were attempting to meld the Godzilla plot with the human plot. I'm open to any indepth discussion on Godzilla, but I still defend my points. I can't watch a Godzilla movie twice because the movies are so bad, yet I love the character of Godzilla. And another thing... Ofcourse Tri-Star intended the cash in on Godzilla's name, it's what Toho has been doing for years now. Toho knows they can make a crappy film, slap Godzilla on it and sell. They're not thinking about audiences in other countries. In Japan Godzilla sells regardless. Unfortunately, this makes for some real bad movies.
Since I was five or so, my favorite monster has always been Godzilla. Still is. I say this just as a prologue to what I am going to say next.
I liked Godzilla '98 and I'm not ashamed to admit it.
I'm not going to call it a good movie, God no. The better Godzilla movies kick this one's butt around. But there are worse Godzilla movies out there.
When I went in to see the '98 film I had only one hope in mind: the it was better than Godzilla v. Megalon . That's it. I had no high expectations, no grand illusions. And for me, it was.
Now every point made about the movie that I've read here holds. The romantic subplot should have been shot. Godzilla should have had radioactive breath. The dinosaur bit I'm shaky on, could go either way, but I can see how it could lower the movie’s worth for a person. But beyond that, it was a neat little monster movie that has had far too much venom spewed against it.
Don't agree? Then I suggest popping Godzilla v. Megalon into the VCR or, God help us, the DVD, and start waiting for the big guy to start kicking butt and taking names. After that eternity has past (I swear to God that I'm still watching that movie, waiting...), enjoy the fight, knowing that a whole bunch of the battle was lifted directly from the last film! Now that is bad.
Like I said, Godzilla '98 isn't the best Godzilla film in the world. But it isn't the worst, either.
______________________________________________________________________
This whole post was an attempt to refute one comment, by Akira Tubo: "The acting, plot, script, and direction were universally reviled by critics and audiences alike." Generalizations are Evil Incarnate and should be avoid at all costs. Also, for a praise of Godzilla '98 by a more critical source, try here. (http://www.stomptokyo.com/movies/godzilla-98.html)
Also, just as a reminder, with the possible exception of the two most recent Godzilla films, none of the modern crop of Godzilla films can hold a candle to Gamera: Guardian of the Universe.
Which is just plain said.
The funny, really funny, thing here is that I wrote a "Deanzilla" review probably eight months ago. Just never got around to doing the captures yet. A number of the points being mentioned: "Beast from 20,000 Fathoms," the romance subplot, and such - they are all in there.
I might need to dust that sucker off and get some captures done.
Also, I don't know. "Godzilla vs. Megalon" makes me laugh for being so bad. Jet Jaguar? The awful Kennydom...
Andrew
Tommy wrote:
>
> While I was not a big fan of the Tri-Star Godzilla movie, I
> defend all my points because it was more professional and a
> step in the right direction.
Professional, maybe (Emmerich is no Honda that is for sure) but I doubt a step in the right direction part - what part of plagaristically derivative and bland is 'right'
> You must agree with me that Toho Godzilla movies are always lacking in terms of movie standards.
And just why MUST I agree with you? I am under no requirement to agree with you on anything about anything. As far as movie standards go, mine are objective - I take them on the movie's terms and seldom mine. As pocorn movies the Godzilla franchise as delivered serious fun and dumb fun in equal amounts.
> Godzilla 1998 was the highest selling movie in Japan in 1998. The Japanese loved it, because it gave them a refreshing new idea.
Actually, the response to the American Godzilla was lukewarm. And the Japanese did not consider it to be Godzilla.
> You can't discredit Tri-Star's vision just because you wanted to see a guy in a rubber suit.
No, but I can discredit it for completely ignoring the established character (it was like watching Pauly Shore playing James Bond) and just recreating the death scene from the DeLaurentis remake of King Kong was like getting spit in the face. I felt that insulted. The effects ranged from okay to breathtaking, but the creature design was poor - I wanted Godzilla, not the T Rex from Jurassic Park reimagined as a mutated iguana.
>At least they were attempting to meld the Godzilla plot with the human plot.
Take a look at the first Godzilla again, and I mean the Japanese language version not the one with Raymond Burr. Godzilla was a metaphor and a monster that meant differant things in differant movies. Only when the producers noted how many children were viewing the movie did they change the character's darker meanings.
> I can't watch a Godzilla movietwice because the movies are so bad, yet I love the character of Godzilla.
Too bad for you, want some cheese with that whine? You probably have problem with George Lazenby as James Bond, or Roger Moore. And all the Dirty Harry movies suck after the first, right? I love Jason, Freddy, and Michael but I hate the movies. Hmm. You know action movies would be great if they weren't so violent.
>And another thing... Ofcourse Tri-Star intended the cash in on Godzilla's name, it's what Toho has been doing for years now.
Every studio has a franchise series to market, they need to make money.
> Toho knows they can make a crappy film, slap Godzilla on it and sell. They're not thinking about audiences in other countries. In Japan Godzilla sells regardless. Unfortunately, this makes for some real bad movies.
You could say the same thing about Star Wars, Star Trek, or anyone roman numeral franchise getting produced. Sheesh.
Three small additions to my original post:
1 - That is the limit to my defense of "Deanzilla." Emmerich should have stuck more to the original, like he claimed to have been doing. I think the stupid jokes and jokey characters are far more damaging to the film than anything else.
2 - What I find funny about the comparisons between Godzilla '98 and Beast from 20,000 Fathoms is that Gojira itself was inspired by Beast .
A giant dinosaur, awakened by American atomic testing, lays waste to a modern city, only to be killed, not military action (per say), but by a clever scientist.
Talk about a rip-off. (Not, I hasten to add, do I consider Gojira a rip-off, really.)
Add let's keep clear of Behemoth, the Sea Monster , which borrows from both Beast and Gojira , shall we?
3 - As much as I don't like Godzilla v. Megalon , I must confess a strange fondness for it. Once we get past all the filler and get to the real fighting, I mean. I've been known to fast forward to just that point. I don't know what to think about that.
Also, I will maintain that the worst Godzillas are better than the worst Gameras any day. Specifically Super Gamera . Ouch.
I know that I may get a few to agree on this. But if the '98 Godzilla movie was just marketed as anything but Godzilla then it would have been just a bit more well received. I didn't think it was a bad movie just a real bad Godzilla movie.
Everyone has said all that needs to be said but...
> Godzilla 1998 was the highest selling movie in Japan in 1998. The Japanese loved it, because it gave them a refreshing new idea.
What is it with this guy, Just because a movie was a huge hit in the boxoffice does not mean that the audience thought it was a great movie. That is a 100% wrong generalization. People went to it becuase its Godzilla. Its the most popular monster on the face of the planet (methinks) and everyone knows the name Godzilla. Its a huge 'pop-culture' icon. Over in japan its even bigger, so you can expect when a new movie comes out with the name godzilla in it they'll be flocking to see it. Does this mean all those people flocking to see it liked it? Absolutly not. They could all hate it. Half of them could hate it, and the other half love it. There is alot of things that can happen. Sure the movie may have been popular when it opened but overall I'd say it was a flop (review wise). But the bottom line is that it made money. Any company could make a movie with godzilla motion effects, slap in some file footage on a preview and market it as a new godzilla movie and show it worldwide and you could bet it would make some money (with the right advertisement. And TriStar had trailers up the ying yang and the money they spent on all the advertisments was made back).
anyway i'm rambling on and stuff......
-Dan
Tommy, you're an @!#$ for even saying what you've said. Don't push your opinions on this movie series as fact. No one cares about your views of it. You can shove GINO up your ass.
Hey,Tommy,listen up---
* Tri-Star Pictures' "Godzilla" Sucks Big Time,in a Major League way!!!!!
* EVERY Japanese "Godzilla" movie rules---Period!!!
* "Godzilla" is the Hulk Hogan of movie monsters,since everyone sees all of his movies just to what kind of a frightening,but cool looking monster that he heavily fights
* You claim you're a big Godzilla fan,but yet criticize nearly every one of his movies--and you like the ultra-s**tty Roland Emmerich/Dean Devlin destruction of the
Godzilla myth?!? : you ain't no big fan!!!
* "Godzilla" movie are NOT about further developement,or exploration of charcters(whether human or monster);they are kickass,good old fashioned movies to sit back,drink a beer,and have mindless fun with!
So,to put it more bluntly:quit whining like a sissy jabroni,and accept the movies for what they are,or don't bother watching them at all(especially if you demand character exploration,and developement)!!!!
We REAL "Godzilla" fans love them endearingly for what they are.
The End.
Well....I can't watch G Vs. The Sea monster or Megalon without Joel and the Bots to help ease the pain.....but, i like the real Godzilla. Squishy and Chadzilla will agree with me that seeing the first, indeed all the films, in the original arrangment and language, makes a big change in how you appreciate them. These are realy Beer and Pizza movies, but thats cool! Relax and have fun. Still, I've not seen Deanzilla yet. Can't bring myself to do it. Its ain't the big guy! One realy good reason....have you EVER seen Godzilla run from a fight? No! G may take his lumps, but he always comes round for the big battle. "When Godzilla gets dissed, he comes back p**sed!" is my motto. Also....its a man in a suit....so?As many people could say "Its just a computer drawing". Reign of Fire looks promising, but do i let the CGI put me off? No, not when the previews look good enough to relax into the story. The men in the G-suit have to use body language to bring life to G, as he is an animal, and a creature of mythological perportions. In the end, it realy don't matter if you like Dean better then G, but, thats cool. I like the reality of a good looking suit, well handled. I'd love to see what Rick Baker could do with the G-98 suit! Make things easier for the guy inside, i'd bet. In the end, its all in the story telling. Heres to the King. Long may he kick butt, and take names.
Actually, the Japanese mostly hated the film. Gojira tai Mosuera actually did better than GINO ever did in Japan. It was popular but never as popular as Gojira tai Destroyah or Gojira tai Mosuera. I remember there were protests when I lived in Nagoya, claiming that this was a disgrace to Nippon(Japan if you don't know) and such. People only like some of the spfx, but as the rest of the film, many people hated it, only a few people in fact liked it. Plot wise it was awful and your "bold new direction" is an insult to my country. Do Americans take Japanese as jokes?!
> It is *the* defining aspect of his character
I would say that being several hundred feet tall is the defining aspect :)
When Godzilla-Mothra-King Ghidora: Dai-kaiju Soukougeki hits video (and subsequently, foreign shores), this silly controversy will be laid to rest and Deanzilla will be forgotten.
I remember seeing Godzilla 1985 in the theatre. Many of us may consider it sub-par today--especially the "Raymond Burr-Dr. Pepper" version--but I'll never forget looking down the row as I got up at the end, and seeing a young kid gazing at the screen in awe. It had knocked his socks off so hard he was actually watching the complete end credits.
I enjoy sharing information and opinions here, but if someone doesn't like what I like, it's hardly a big deal. Tommy can watch Deanzilla until he's completely sick of it; I'll watch the REAL Godzilla movies. There's one for every mood, now.
Meanwhile, Roland and Dean are reduced to ripping off stuff like The Giant Spider Invasion with "actors" like David Arquette. They coasted for quite a while stealing from everything in sight, but soon they'll be joining Brian DePalma parking cars for Hollywood's more creative people.
chaoszilla wrote:
>
> Do Americans take Japanese as jokes?!
Let's pray you never watch a World Wrestling Entertainment show with Tajiri on it from 2001...
Hey look everybody, its a Godzilla fanboy in denial!!
Listen up, Steve-o:
*Tri-Star's "Godzilla" brought good acting, an interesting plot, good action, good special effects, and everything else that the Japanese movies lack. This was something that had been lacking since the 50's.
*NOT Every Japanese "Godzilla" movie rules. "Son of Godzilla", "Godzilla's Revenge", "Godzilla vs. Megalon", and "Godzilla 2000" were all trash. "Godzilla X Megaguirus" was pretty horrid as well. The Godzilla movies have gone downhill. The only sign of a step forward was the recent GMK, but now it seems with Godzilla X Mechagodzilla, Toho is taking a step BACKWARD.
*Perhaps everyone sees Godzilla's movies to see what frightening and cool monster he fights this time around, but that's because that's all there is to watch. No interesting plot. No good acting. Toho should spend time on their movies instead of cranking out peices of crap that you fanboys will see just because they slap the name Godzilla on it.
*I can see that you must be a "big fan" since you'll make such ridiculous comments in order to defend your beloved Godzilla.
*Godzilla movies should be fun and kickass, but at the same time they DO need to develop charcters, among other things.
And you are in no position to accuse people of whining when you make comments such as "Tri-Star Pictures' "Godzilla" Sucks Big Time,in a
Major League way!!!!!"
As I said at the beginning of my post, you're a Godzilla fanboy in denial of the truth.
Steven Millan wrote:
>
> Hey,Tommy,listen up---
> * Tri-Star Pictures' "Godzilla" Sucks Big Time,in a
> Major League way!!!!!
> * EVERY Japanese "Godzilla" movie rules---Period!!!
> * "Godzilla" is the Hulk Hogan of movie
> monsters,since everyone sees all of his movies just to what
> kind of a frightening,but cool looking monster that he
> heavily fights
> * You claim you're a big Godzilla fan,but yet
> criticize nearly every one of his movies--and you like the
> ultra-s**tty Roland Emmerich/Dean Devlin destruction of the
> Godzilla myth?!? : you ain't no big fan!!!
> * "Godzilla" movie are NOT about further
> developement,or exploration of charcters(whether human or
> monster);they are kickass,good old fashioned movies to sit
> back,drink a beer,and have mindless fun with!
> So,to put it more bluntly:quit whining like a
> sissy jabroni,and accept the movies for what they are,or
> don't bother watching them at all(especially if you demand
> character exploration,and developement)!!!!
> We REAL "Godzilla" fans love them endearingly for
> what they are.
> The End.
Joe John wrote:
"Tri-Star's "Godzilla" brought good acting, an interesting plot, good action, good special effects, and everything else that the Japanese movies lack. This was something that had been lacking since the 50's."
Look, I defended Godzilla '98 earlier, but that's going far too far. The acting, action, and F/X okay, at best, but interesting plot? Are you nuts? The cliches are overbounding, and radiation as a cause of growth is the bunk.
(I know Eight Legged Freaks uses the same idiot device. I've still got my hopes up for it.)
And I'm not about to ask what "everything else" is. I pray humor was not a part of it.
Joe John also says:
"'Son of Godzilla', 'Godzilla's Revenge', 'Godzilla vs. Megalon', and 'Godzilla 2000' were all trash."
Calling Son of Godzilla and Godzilla 2000 trash was bad enough, but mentioning them in the same sentence as Godzilla's Revenge and Godzilla vs. Megalon is just plain wrong . Son of Godzilla is director Jun Fukuda's best Godzilla (not that that's saying much), and Godzilla 2000 gave me hope for new Godzillas. That movie was the best Godzilla film in years.
There. Got that out my system.
Tommy, Joe, I'm not gonna waist time on you dumbs**ts. Why you trash cool movies starring the one and only Godzilla, I don't know. How you could not enjoy them, I don't know. But you guys could probably see the movies better if you would remove your heads from your ASSES!!! But like I said, I'm not going to waist time on you idiots, I got better things to do. LIKE WATCHING KICKASS GODZILLA FLICKS!
Oh what is funny is that GxMG may be better spfx wise than GMK. Suzuki quit GxMG for personal reasons and Higuchi(gamera 3 spfx guy's)prime student is doing spfx for this film. I agree that there are bad G films. But also KONG was technically the inspiration for Godzilla 1954. Originally it was going to be an irradiated octopus but then they used a dinosaur, becoz of the dinosaurs from KING KONG. G'98 is beast from 20,000 fathoms not G. And it's an insult to the Japanese!
> Hey look everybody, its a Godzilla fanboy in denial!!
>
> Listen up, Steve-o:
>
> *Tri-Star's "Godzilla" brought good acting, an interesting
> plot, good action, good special effects, and everything else
> that the Japanese movies lack. This was something that had
> been lacking since the 50's.
>
> *NOT Every Japanese "Godzilla" movie rules. "Son of
> Godzilla", "Godzilla's Revenge", "Godzilla vs. Megalon", and
> "Godzilla 2000" were all trash. "Godzilla X Megaguirus" was
> pretty horrid as well. The Godzilla movies have gone
> downhill. The only sign of a step forward was the recent GMK,
> but now it seems with Godzilla X Mechagodzilla, Toho is
> taking a step BACKWARD.
>
> *Perhaps everyone sees Godzilla's movies to see what
> frightening and cool monster he fights this time around, but
> that's because that's all there is to watch. No interesting
> plot. No good acting. Toho should spend time on their movies
> instead of cranking out peices of crap that you fanboys will
> see just because they slap the name Godzilla on it.
>
> *I can see that you must be a "big fan" since you'll make
> such ridiculous comments in order to defend your beloved
> Godzilla.
>
> *Godzilla movies should be fun and kickass, but at the same
> time they DO need to develop charcters, among other things.
>
> And you are in no position to accuse people of whining when
> you make comments such as "Tri-Star Pictures' "Godzilla"
> Sucks Big Time,in a
> Major League way!!!!!"
>
> As I said at the beginning of my post, you're a Godzilla
> fanboy in denial of the truth.
>
>
>
> Steven Millan wrote:
> >
> > Hey,Tommy,listen up---
> > * Tri-Star Pictures' "Godzilla" Sucks Big Time,in a
> > Major League way!!!!!
> > * EVERY Japanese "Godzilla" movie
> rules---Period!!!
> > * "Godzilla" is the Hulk Hogan of movie
> > monsters,since everyone sees all of his movies just to what
> > kind of a frightening,but cool looking monster that he
> > heavily fights
> > * You claim you're a big Godzilla fan,but yet
> > criticize nearly every one of his movies--and you like the
> > ultra-s**tty Roland Emmerich/Dean Devlin destruction of the
> > Godzilla myth?!? : you ain't no big fan!!!
> > * "Godzilla" movie are NOT about further
> > developement,or exploration of charcters(whether human or
> > monster);they are kickass,good old fashioned movies to sit
> > back,drink a beer,and have mindless fun with!
> > So,to put it more bluntly:quit whining like a
> > sissy jabroni,and accept the movies for what they are,or
> > don't bother watching them at all(especially if you demand
> > character exploration,and developement)!!!!
> > We REAL "Godzilla" fans love them endearingly for
> > what they are.
> > The End.
Hey,Joe John,
Your bashing of me is so laughable,that not only am I speechless,but try telling what you told me to both "Long Island Cannibal Massacre" maestro Nathan Schiff(one of the biggest Godzilla fans),and my good buddy Tom Simmons,over at Video Junkie.
To the others who wrote supporting posts(that bashed back at Joe John),thanks an awful lot for having my back,and telling Joe John just how it really is(Godzilla-wise).
As for being a "fanboy"(I'm so tired of hearing that word),that's what one part of the internet is for,celebrating your love of anything "fanboy" style.
And I'm in no denial of enjoying Godzilla:Nathan Schiff strongly feels the same way as I do,and grew up on Godzilla movies as much as I did. And,by the way,an awful lot of people I know hate Roland Emmerich/Dean Devlin/Tri-Star's "Godzilla" movie,and I'm not whining when I say that. And next time someone makes another big studio Godzilla film,let it be either Paul Verhoeven or Peter Jackson that makes that film,for they would add the character development,further exploration of Godzilla,and artistic intelligence that the Big G would really need(as you and Tommy want to endearingly see.Maybe that would make a Godzilla movie much more interesting).
Hasta La Vista, Double J.!!!!
I still like Godzilla movies. True, they can be accussed of being predictable, but all I watch them for is a guy in a rubber suit kicking the crap outta models of cities, fighting other guys in suits and puppets and stomping on toy tanks and toy aeroplanes. I think I got my interest in Godzilla when I was still in the womb as my mother said when she was pregnant with me a channel showed Godzilla movies every night and she stayed up to watch them!
Realy? Luckey you. My mom always wondered what was wrong with me........she still does....not that i blaim her,,,,,,,,,,,,,
> Oh what is funny is that GxMG may be better spfx wise than
> GMK. Suzuki quit GxMG for personal reasons and
> Higuchi(gamera 3 spfx guy's)prime student is doing spfx for
> this film.
Suzuki did not quit. He was not asked back.
GMK's Kamiya was Higuchi's prime student.
Where do you get your information?
NCE
ryu from MZ said so. he's an insider. and it was posted that suzuki was going to do effects, but in middle of production he quit.NCE wrote:
>
> > Oh what is funny is that GxMG may be better spfx wise than
> > GMK. Suzuki quit GxMG for personal reasons and
> > Higuchi(gamera 3 spfx guy's)prime student is doing spfx for
> > this film.
>
> Suzuki did not quit. He was not asked back.
> GMK's Kamiya was Higuchi's prime student.
>
> Where do you get your information?
>
> NCE
Who is Ryu? I'm at Toho everyday and I don't know anyone named Ryu. As for Suzuki, he was never announced as FX director on GxMG. It has been Kikuchi since day one.
Norman England
I agree with those who say G98 was an OK giant lizard movie, but not a Godzilla movie. It needed three things, IMHO, to make it worthy of the Godzilla name:
1) Radioactive fire-breath.
2) Invulnerability (No running from small-arms fire or being killed by a few missiles.)
3) Prehistoric roots (Godzilla is a mutated dinosaur, not a modern lizard.)
The lack of these is why the movie is called Godzilla In Name Only, or GINO.
I want to emphasize that I am NOT of the "Godzilla must be played by someone in a rubber suit" school of thought. I was excited when I learned that they were going to do a Godzilla movie in CGI. Done right, it would have been spectacular. (Just imagine the scene from G2000 where he is hit with the armor-piercing missiles done in CGI, showing huge wounds being torn in his flesh. Then they heal right before our eyes like Wolverine's forehead in X-Men.) I had no real problem with the design either.
If they do a sequel, they should mutate the hatchling into a more powerful creature, possessing at least the first two of the three attributes I listed above. One way to do that is put him in a situation where he is exposed to more radiation.
Too bad they didn't go with the original 1993 script by Ted Elliot and Terry Rossio. That would have been a dynamite movie! It can be accessed at
www. rodansroost.com specifically in the "Kaiju Scrap Yard" section.