Print Page - Howling III

Title: Howling III
Post by: Andrew on October 27, 2003, 09:59:22 PM

Happy Halloween everyone (a few days early, but scheduling, etc.).

You know, this review started running on and I cut it short. However, there was still a horde of idiocy to point out. Everything from the burnt werewolf skeleton attacking the one guy, to the terrible awards ceremony scene.

Ugly, badly trained little movie. I look forward to it collecting dust.

http://www.badmovies.org/movies/howlingiii/

Title: Re: Howling III
Post by: wuggles451 on October 27, 2003, 10:46:32 PM

I saw this rotting in the Wal Mart $5.88 bin I almost picked it up, but grabbed Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell instead. Now I'm curious as to how bad it really is. O yeah and good review

Post Edited (10-27-03 21:47)

Title: Re: Howling III
Post by: JohnL on October 27, 2003, 11:05:34 PM

Although I agree that the movie stinks, Jerboa always appealed to me, furry stomach and all. I know, I need help... :)

Title: Re: Howling III
Post by: Cullen on October 27, 2003, 11:51:02 PM

Out of morbid curiousity, how does Howling III compare with Howling II?

Title: Re: Howling III
Post by: daveblackeye15 on October 28, 2003, 12:08:49 AM

YEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!! HOWLING III ALRIGHT WOOOOOOOO!!!! I saw the end of this (the point where they burn the guy who later attacks the army guys are a skelton, to the very end) and I was freaked out! I was shakeing all over the place because of it and I had fun. That was back when they had "Monster Vision" on TNT with Joe Bob Briggs (ahh the good old days) but I REALLY doubt that this movie will be as much fun as the first time I saw it.

P.S. you cut the review short....awww maaan.

-the first rule of fat club-

Title: ALL the HOWLING "sequels" sucked, except for...
Post by: kriegerg69 on October 28, 2003, 01:53:55 AM

HOWLING VI: THE FREAKS. I really liked that one more than any of the so-called "sequels", because it was a nifty takeoff on FREAKS (1932), and had the added horror of vampires thrown into it.

Title: Re: Howling III
Post by: JohnL on October 28, 2003, 06:49:24 PM

>Out of morbid curiousity, how does Howling III compare with Howling II?

It's hard to compare them, since they're very different movies. Personally, I never liked Howling II.

Title: Proof I am going senile
Post by: Cullen on October 28, 2003, 10:15:52 PM

Cullen (duh) wrote:

> Out of morbid curiousity, how does Howling III compare
> with Howling II?

I thought this question was familiar. I asked it the last time (http://www.badmovies.org/bbs/read.php?f=2&i=41181&t=41169) Howling III was mentioned.

I'll bet, if I go through all of my posts, I find that I'm just saying the same things over and over again, each time thinking I'm saying something new.

I'm such a moron.

(I love the edit feature. It's very, very good to me.)

Post Edited (10-29-03 01:15)

Title: Re: Howling III
Post by: akiratubo on October 28, 2003, 11:11:43 PM

I have never been able to finish this movie. It starts out all right but quickly grows unimaginably boring.

Title: Re: Howling III
Post by: Flangepart on October 30, 2003, 11:50:02 AM

Joe Bob Briggs almost made me watch this one.....Almost.
But, even HE could not pull me through it....There just wern't enough "FU"

Badmovies.org Forum

Movies => Bad Movies => Topic started by: Andrew on October 27, 2003, 09:59:22 PM