HOUSE OF THE FLYING DAGGERS (2004) - Great Chinese martial arts film. They really know how to make a movie. Zhang Ziyi from CROUCHING TIGER HIDDEN DRAGON (2000) and HERO (2002) stars as a member of the House of the Flying Daggers who are fighting against the goverment. The end is a little drawn out, but still a great film.
(http://www.helloziyi.us/Pictures/hofd4.jpg)
IRON MONKEY (1993) and KUNG FU HUSTLE (2004) are also very good ones and of coarse most anything with Jet Li. Really like these type films. Pure excellence.
Other rather recent Chinese favorites of mine are TEMPTATION OF A MONK (1993) and THE STORY OF RICKY (1991).
Post Edited (09-04-05 22:16)
Everybody was so hot about "Hero", but although it is a fantastic film I though, after repeated viewings, that the repetitive structure (several characters explain similar events) was too limiting. I think "House..." is even better, as the flow of the narration is more clasical, and, at the same time, it allows more freedom to the viewer. Fantastic film, among the best of the genre I've ever seen.
I own the film, have seen it several times, and quite enjoy it. However, I think the ending leaves something to be desired. The final duel got to be too... Silly, I guess, for me.
Scott wrote:
>> Great Chinese martial arts film. They really know how to make a movie.
I can´t agree with you Scott.
"House of the Flying Daggers" is full of superfluous computer FX.
Great chinese martial Arts films are those that were made by using WIREWORK.
CGI destroys the genre of martial arts. CGI is Hollywood-F*** that has more and more influence on eastern cinema.
The same with HERO - I am very disappointed by both movies.
"I can´t agree with you Scott.
"House of the Flying Daggers" is full of superfluous computer FX.
Great chinese martial Arts films are those that were made by using WIREWORK.
CGI destroys the genre of martial arts. CGI is Hollywood-F*** that has more and more influence on eastern cinema.
The same with HERO - I am very disappointed by both movies."
The CG in HOFD was mostly used for little assists, like the daggers in the air. All the jumping around, etc, was done using wires. The CG elements in HOFD were quite minor, I don't think I understand why they bother you. It makes a little more sense to me about Hero though.
Jim H wrote:
>>The CG elements in HOFD were quite minor, I don't think I understand why they bother you. It makes a little more sense to me about Hero though.
It´s easy to understand:
Because I am a fan of martial arts films it is important for me that a film of that genre is CGI-free or better: pure wirework.
It´s like with oil - a drop of it contaminates hundreds of litres of water. So even little, unimportant CGI-made scenes contaminate the whole film.
Oh, and there were far more scenes that were made with computer FX than the dagger-scenes. Besides, the scenes with the daggers in the air were total crap...
Because I am a fan of martial arts films it is important for me that a film of that genre is CGI-free or better: pure wirework.
It´s like with oil - a drop of it contaminates hundreds of litres of water. So even little, unimportant CGI-made scenes contaminate the whole film.
As a martial artist, I feel about the same about wire-work, Well, sorta. I like the film to be as pure m/a as possible with no wires or augmentation. Then I can really respect the m/a ability of the actors/stunt people. Once the wires are in there, well it's still fun to watch but not quite as good. From there CG doesn't bother me any more
Ok, show me a martial artist that jumps 10 feet high. As long as there is no martial artist that is able to do this (and many other impossible things), the makers of these movies stay dependent on wire-work.
Another point is, that wire-work is used only in unreal, exaggerated scenes. If you like to watch the ability of martial artists, you can do it without problem. Which m/a-director needs wire-work in a standart fighting scene?
Ok, show me a martial artist that jumps 10 feet high.
None, and that's the point. Onec you have 'martial arts' fights with people jumping 10 feet in the air then it's no longer kung-fu and it's crossed into a fantasy world where gravity is only half as strong as Earth or something. I would rather stay in the world where m/a actors/stunt people do true martial arts, but I don't really mind going into that fantasy world either. Once, I'm there, though, it' doesn't matter to me if I got there through wires or CG or whatever; it's still fantasy and I just enjoy t for the fantasy that it is and don't quibble about how
Wire-work or CGI - that´s not a detail-descussion, that´s no quibbling, especially on a movies phorum.
Maybe they should split the m/a-genre into real and unreal, the latter one further into CGI and CGI-free...
Maybe they should split the m/a-genre into real and unreal, the latter one further into CGI and CGI-free...
Maybe we should just sit back and enjoy the movie whether it's got wires or CG or little miniature buildings exploding or fake blood and guts falling out or rubber monsters or whatever. It's all fun, and too much fun to let something like whether some flying daggers are CG or not spoil the fun
I remember some threads on this phorum that were related to "CGI - yes or not?".
To understand my standpoint, you should know that I hate computer effects in movies. And I hate them even more in movies of a genre I like.
Well, a lot of the Hong Kong films are based on martial art legend in China and fantasy is just an extension of that. Then those films created a whole breed (or possible sub-genre) of fantastic martial arts films we see today.
These newer films have taken on a life of their own with CGI which some how works for this genre at times. As long as they are entertaining that is the main thing. The subject of "real" martial arts can go a long way..................
I'm not a big fan of CGI, but KUNG FU HUSTLE was a lot of fun. How about Buddhist Palm?
Buddhist Palm?
It was called Buddhist Palm (or Buddha Palm) in KUNG FU HUSTLE. This couldn't be done without CGI and fit into the type of film that it is.
Post Edited (09-09-05 21:54)
Wence, I can certainly see where you are coming from, but it is all artifice. It's not just martial art films, every movie you will ever see is artifice.
Every martial arts film ever made has relied on very complex choreography. Those people fighting are not actually fighting, it's all complicated dance steps. Why did they turn to wire-work, as you say? Because they wanted to make these fake fight scenes have more impact. Of course, it takes a lot of actual physicality to make these scenes work. Artistry.
But why? To make the movie entertaining. That is the be-all end-all of every movie, even if the people have different ideas of what makes a movie entertaining. To rail against CGI as being unrealistic, well it's a losing battle, and not even in step with the filmmakers who make these movies.
What I'm saying, and please don't view this as a personal attack, is that I do not agree with your movie-making philosophy.
So anyway, I really liked HOTFD. I also think the end went on too long. You can't kill someone and then have them come back to life. Story-wise, it's a cheat. Other than that, great movie.
Mofo Rising wrote:
>> Wence, I can certainly see where you are coming from, but it is all artifice. It's not just martial art films, every movie you will ever see is artifice.
I am absolutely on your standpoint. I have no problem with artifice, on the contrary, I like exaggerations and unrealistic actions.
The question is, what is good and what is bad artifice. I say CGI is very bad artifice.
"To understand my standpoint, you should know that I hate computer effects in movies."
Can you tell me why? I don't think I understand. If you didn't even know a film had CG, then found out later, would you think less of the movie? How is CG worse than, say, stop motion?
All great CGI-filled big budget movies were total disapointments for me, all !
I remember the three new SW-episodes. I saw them and I say f**k that!
The old ones look still cool and better than the new ones. Or did you like the colors in the new ones, especially in Episode I ?
But not only SW, allother brandnew CGI flicks sucked (in my opinion).
Don´t you see what´s real and what´s CGI ? I have the problem that I recognize computer effects in movies...
Obvious CGI is terrible.
Subtley done, it it excellent. The prolem is, CGI has become the industry standard and nobody remembers how to do the effect the hard was anymore. I kick myself for missing a chance to meet Ray Harryhausen and have him sign my copy of the 'Golden Voyage of Sinbad'.
CGI is being used now because 'everybody does it'. Well, everybody shouldn't. it has it's place and that plae isn't in every other movie being made.
CG is just art. Some of it is good, some of it sucks.
While I'm all for nostalgia, and thought that Golden Voyage of Sinbad is a great movie, it's still *possible* to make movies like that if one wants to. The context is all wrong now... it doesn't look the same, now, as it did *then* if you know what I mean.
Obvious CGI does look garish, I agree. Didn't see Sky Captain, but the CGI in Revenge of the Sith was overall pretty good. It's just that there was so *much* of it that it changed the whole texture of the movie into something surreal.
Returning to the topic a bit, the CGI in Kung Fu Hustle was so cartoony that I just enjoyed it for the joke it was. I still chuckle when I remember the Landlady stepping in front of her husband, cigarette dangling from her lips, with the most dire and baleful look in her eye as she inhaled... chest expanding...
Ugggg.
Who recommended this movie?
Too slow... artsy without compelling characters. The I-love-you-I'll-kill-you thing, once again. Uggggg. It was bad, but it wasn't bad enough. It fell into that unhappy middle ground of badness that is neither good enough nor bad enough to be enjoyable.
You had your classic long death scene Zapranoth at the end.....................It may have been me who recommended this one.
I enjoyed it, but it wasn't as memorable as other similar movies, such as Hero and Crouching Tiger. It still had some great cinematography and great use of colours, and Andy Lau is always fun to watch [what a bastard with those rocks in the drum/dance scene]
Still, I really enjoy these types of films. Sure they can be sappy and tug the emotions [or at least attempt to] but I still like it more than the average Hollywood film.
The operatic death scene, whipped in thick CGI snow, was actually pretty funny, I liked that.
So far, though, Hero was much more enjoyable. Gotta watch Kung Fu Hustle again.