- Welcome to Badmovies.org Forum.
Recent posts
#21
Bad Movies / Re: Generate Movie Poster with...
Last post by Rev. Powell - June 10, 2026, 08:09:42 AM
Kinda lazy on the sequel poster.
#23
Television / Re: THE BEST MYSTERY SCIENCE T...
Last post by LilCerberus - June 09, 2026, 09:49:58 PMThe Hellcats(1968)
(I forget who said this)
"I'll just blend in here." - about a suit who walks into the biker bar.....
(I forget who said this)
"I'll just blend in here." - about a suit who walks into the biker bar.....
#24
Television / Re: THE BEST MYSTERY SCIENCE T...
Last post by Trevor - June 09, 2026, 09:32:33 PMMASTER NINJA II
Mike: "Very interesting, but cuckoo" 😳😀😄🐢
Mike: "Very interesting, but cuckoo" 😳😀😄🐢
#25
Bad Movies / Re: RECENT VIEWINGS (Bad Movie...
Last post by chainsaw midget - June 09, 2026, 06:26:33 PMClass of Nuke'Em High (1986)
This is a Troma movie. This is perhaps the single MOST troma movie that doesn't have the words "Toxic" and "Avenger" in the title. You already know if you like it based on that alone.
A highschool half a mile away from the worlds worst maintained leaking nuclear power plant is terrorized by a group of 80s punks (that we're told used to be the school's honor society). In addition, the radiation cause other mutations while continues to while the power plant continue to try to ignore it/and or cover it up.
Fun movie, but by no means a "good" one.
This is a Troma movie. This is perhaps the single MOST troma movie that doesn't have the words "Toxic" and "Avenger" in the title. You already know if you like it based on that alone.
A highschool half a mile away from the worlds worst maintained leaking nuclear power plant is terrorized by a group of 80s punks (that we're told used to be the school's honor society). In addition, the radiation cause other mutations while continues to while the power plant continue to try to ignore it/and or cover it up.
Fun movie, but by no means a "good" one.
#26
Good Movies / Re: Best movie chirps
Last post by bob - June 09, 2026, 04:51:30 PMI am partial to Birdemic 3: Sea Eagle
#27
Off Topic Discussion / Re: Picture of the day, part I...
Last post by lester1/2jr - June 09, 2026, 03:15:10 PM
#28
Bad Movies / Re: RECENT VIEWINGS (Bad Movie...
Last post by Dr. Whom - June 09, 2026, 02:58:13 PMQuote from: zombie no.one on June 09, 2026, 02:20:33 PMnext planned Bond with Dalton for early 90s was to be called WARHEAD 2000 AD (?!?!?)
That seems like a Bond/Judge Dredd crossover
#29
Bad Movies / Re: RECENT VIEWINGS (Bad Movie...
Last post by zombie no.one - June 09, 2026, 02:20:33 PMLICENSE TO KILL (1989)
Bad Bond, because it's not very Bond-esque. Dalton, like Daniel Craig, may be a fine actor, but he's not a Bond... at least to me.
Too much emphasis on serious rolling action and important looking setups, but a complete dearth of Bond-y moments. nahmean?
trivia:
first Bond movie not to be named after a Flemming Bond story
was going to be called 'License Revoked' but US test audiences equated that with driving not killing.
next planned Bond with Dalton for early 90s was to be called WARHEAD 2000 AD (?!?!?)
Bad Bond, because it's not very Bond-esque. Dalton, like Daniel Craig, may be a fine actor, but he's not a Bond... at least to me.
Too much emphasis on serious rolling action and important looking setups, but a complete dearth of Bond-y moments. nahmean?
trivia:
first Bond movie not to be named after a Flemming Bond story
was going to be called 'License Revoked' but US test audiences equated that with driving not killing.
next planned Bond with Dalton for early 90s was to be called WARHEAD 2000 AD (?!?!?)
#30
Good Movies / Re: Recent theatrical viewings
Last post by Rev. Powell - June 09, 2026, 01:28:17 PMMy biggest complaint was the kids are supposed to be in their 20s but a) have the romantic proclivities of teenagers (you hit on that too) and b) work retail, yet all own their own houses. And as you said, there are way too many employees there.
The director is only 26. I think the script was not a winner in terms of believability, but as you said there are some good monologues and very funny moments. I thought of giving it 3/5, but I must admit everyone in the packed house enjoyed it, which influenced me into assuming I was being something of a jaded cinephile curmudgeon. I also thought the lead female was very good. It's not perfect, by any stretch, but entertaining flick with promising young talent. The 8.1 rating on IMDb is ludicrously high, and so are letterboxd reviews (my 3.5 rating made me look like a hater).
The director is only 26. I think the script was not a winner in terms of believability, but as you said there are some good monologues and very funny moments. I thought of giving it 3/5, but I must admit everyone in the packed house enjoyed it, which influenced me into assuming I was being something of a jaded cinephile curmudgeon. I also thought the lead female was very good. It's not perfect, by any stretch, but entertaining flick with promising young talent. The 8.1 rating on IMDb is ludicrously high, and so are letterboxd reviews (my 3.5 rating made me look like a hater).