Main Menu

Recent posts

#21
Bad Movies / Re: 100 Movie titles that are ...
Last post by bob - Today at 07:26:07 AM
64

#22
Bad Movies / Re: Generate Movie Poster with...
Last post by bob - Today at 07:25:11 AM

#23
Bad Movies / Re: 'Best Picture' Oscar... go...
Last post by zombie no.one - Today at 07:15:05 AM
the 3rd shortest winner after ANNIE HALL and DRIVING MISS DAISY is THE ARTIST, clocking in at 1hr 40mins.


(considering I've never seen the film, the number of times I end up typing "DRIVING MISS DAISY" on this board is absurd  :teddyr: )
#24
Quote from: Alex on Today at 06:47:55 AMAI isn't exactly under control of its 'owners'. It's entirely possible this is a rogue thing, or that if not directed at a specific target they just randomly review movies? Anyway, I am just guessing here.

how long till we have a movie that's entirely generated by AI with no human prompting, is then uploaded to streaming services by AI, and is then listed on IMDb by AI, and gets a bunch of AI reviews submitted for it?  :buggedout:
#25
Off Topic Discussion / Re: Alex's even longer post th...
Last post by Alex - Today at 07:08:52 AM
Ash seems to have picked up a liking for 1) The Rocky Horror Picture Show and 2) John Carpenter films. He's watched The Thing and The Fog with me, and last night I discovered him watching Big Trouble in Little China town.

I am not going to complain about that.

Kristi's health insurance has found a way out of paying her bill. Since she still has a US bank account, she can file for bankruptcy there, and it doesn't affect my earnings or pension over here. Still, this is all in ahead of us. I can't imagine that anyone involved is going to decide the money involved isn't worth the effort of going after and just forget the debt. A few thousand maybe, but when its over a hundred thousand... not so much.

I've been talking with various support services, got some advice about how to explain things to Ash. Ordered a book that was recommended. I was hoping for a fairly indepth treatise on advice on how to best explain to him, but what I got was more or less a kids book that I guess I could just hand to him, let him read it and figure it out on his own. I'll talk with him this weekend when I am off work.

Told Kristi the other day that while we don't know how long we have left together (hell, does anyone? After all we aren't promised anything other than a beginning and an end, not how long we get between the two), that even if it was just one day, that it has all been worth it. I still feel like, despite everything that Iam winning at life, as much as it is possible to do so. Got Lilly Beths anniversery in a few weeks. Booked time off for that because, well I'm better out of work for those days as I've learned each time I've made the mistake of being in for it. September is my least favourite month of the year. But once its out of the way, its the run up to Samhain, and then Yule, both of which I am looking forward to.
#26
Bad Movies / Re: 'Best Picture' Oscar... go...
Last post by Trevor - Today at 07:05:35 AM
DANCES WITH WOLVES:   181 min
SCHINDLER'S LIST:  192 min
TITANIC: 198 min
LORD OF THE RINGS RETURN OF THE KING: 201 min
THE DEPARTED: 151 min
#27
Off Topic Discussion / Re: fine example of IMDb revie...
Last post by Alex - Today at 06:47:55 AM
AI isn't exactly under control of its 'owners'. It's entirely possible this is a rogue thing, or that if not directed at a specific target they just randomly review movies? Anyway, I am just guessing here.
#28
Bad Movies / Re: 'Best Picture' Oscar... go...
Last post by Trevor - Today at 05:41:25 AM
THE BEER HUNTER:  172 min
PATTON:  173 min
MY FAIR LADY: 152 min
WEST SIDE STORY: 162 min.

😎🐢
#29
can't say I expected a nearly 20 year old movie that was already showered with accolades by real people to get the 'review bot' treatment, but I was just scouring the IMDb reviews for HOT FUZZ (2007).

there are a whole bunch of consecutive reviews published on June 21st this year, which are all roughly equal length, they all seem to start off like they're somehow already halfway through the review, and all basically look like they were written by AI.

usernames:

wendymarvell-66
greyfullbuster-55
mirajane-00
lisana-44
lexus-33
lucyheartfelia-22

plus a few more similar...

clicking on their profiles reveals they have all basically reviewed the same bunch of other movies, including THE DRIVER, THE DOG STARS, THE NIGHT EATS THE WORLD etc etc

wouldn't it be very easy for IMDb to stop this happening?

also like I said a movie like HOT FUZZ does not even need the 'review-maxxing' treatment, so why are they there?

#30
Bad Movies / Re: 100 Movie titles that are ...
Last post by Dr. Whom - Today at 01:22:08 AM
63. Oliver!