ANDY WARHOL'S DRACULA (1973)

[RCMerchant]

Dracula, played by Udo Kier, with his coffin tied to the hood of his car, goes with his creepy manservant to Italy to find the blood of virgins. Or as Reinfield says "wirgins"
So he goes to Italy, and drinks the blood of some rich girls who are getting f**ked by a communist gardner played by New York accented Joe Dallasandro.
Any way, every time he drinks they're blood he pukes it up all over the joint, because he needs virgin blood, ya see?
Yes, a very complex plot. Lotsa nudity. Lotsa blood. Stupid as f**k.
SPOILER!
Oh- at the end Dracula gets cut into parts like a chicken.
Worth watching for Udo Kier as the spastic, pathetic Count.
Rolling around in a wheelchair, having convulsions and puking blood. He even turns green in one scene

Hey, I sat threw the whole thing- so....Hey. I liked it!

http://youtu.be/-mxhJzSKV08

[Rev. Powell]

Most people preferred A.W.'S DRACULA, but I remember liking A.W.'s FRANKENSTEIN better. Haven't seen either of them in more than 20 years.

Of course, they had nothing to do with Warhol, he just slapped his name on them as producer. It's the work of Paul Morrisey, an underrated artsploitation director.

[Svengoolie 3]

Dracula, played by Udo Kier, with his coffin tied to the hood of his car, goes with his creepy manservant to Italy to find the blood of virgins. Or as Reinfield says "wirgins"
So he goes to Italy, and drinks the blood of some rich girls who are getting f**ked by a communist gardner played by New York accented Joe Dallasandro.
Any way, every time he drinks they're blood he pukes it up all over the joint, because he needs virgin blood, ya see?
Yes, a very complex plot. Lotsa nudity. Lotsa blood. Stupid as f**k.
SPOILER!
Oh- at the end Dracula gets cut into parts like a chicken.
Worth watching for Udo Kier as the spastic, pathetic Count.
Rolling around in a wheelchair, having convulsions and puking blood. He even turns green in one scene

Hey, I sat threw the whole thing- so....Hey. I liked it!

http://youtu.be/-mxhJzSKV08

Holy shxt, this sound slike it made that dracula movie with rick the dragon steamboat look good, and i'd have sworn only "Dracula 3000" could do that.

BTW, RCM, I'll bet this is still better that "Dracula 3000". In fact, it had udo keir in it so I know it was....

[Rev. Powell]

Dracula, played by Udo Kier, with his coffin tied to the hood of his car, goes with his creepy manservant to Italy to find the blood of virgins. Or as Reinfield says "wirgins"
So he goes to Italy, and drinks the blood of some rich girls who are getting f**ked by a communist gardner played by New York accented Joe Dallasandro.
Any way, every time he drinks they're blood he pukes it up all over the joint, because he needs virgin blood, ya see?
Yes, a very complex plot. Lotsa nudity. Lotsa blood. Stupid as f**k.
SPOILER!
Oh- at the end Dracula gets cut into parts like a chicken.
Worth watching for Udo Kier as the spastic, pathetic Count.
Rolling around in a wheelchair, having convulsions and puking blood. He even turns green in one scene

Hey, I sat threw the whole thing- so....Hey. I liked it!

http://youtu.be/-mxhJzSKV08

Holy shxt, this sound slike it made that dracula movie with rick the dragon steamboat look good, and i'd have sworn only "Dracula 3000" could do that.

BTW, RCM, I'll bet this is still better that "Dracula 3000". In fact, it had udo keir in it so I know it was....

It's not a "bad" movie per se... it's a deliberately bad/intentionally campy movie, long before Troma made the concept passe.

[indianasmith]

I watched this years ago in college.  I remember the excess nudity more than the plot!

[RCMerchant]

I watched this years ago in college.  I remember the excess nudity more than the plot!

That was pretty much the point.  
I really enjoyed it more now than I did then.  Likely because back then nudity was more interesting to me, because I was young and hornier. Udo Kier having convulsions every other scene is- I can't explain it.
But it's like watching Curly Howard. Only Curly is puking blood!  
It's a fun movie!

[RCMerchant]

Most people preferred A.W.'S DRACULA, but I remember liking A.W.'s FRANKENSTEIN better. Haven't seen either of them in more than 20 years.

Of course, they had nothing to do with Warhol, he just slapped his name on them as producer. It's the work of Paul Morrisey, an underrated artsploitation director.

Me either. I caught it on Tubi during the blizzard. First time I seen it since mebbe 1992. I seen AW's FRANKENSTEIN more because I actually owned it for a long time.

I Like the  ANDY WARHOL'S FRANKENSTEIN (1973) one better too. That movie is out there!  
That movie is just-I dunno-there is just so much s**t going on here-none of it makes a lick of sense,mind you, but it's real sick, real gory, real f**ked up.
And it's got Udo Kier too.  
I love it, of course.
http://youtu.be/19mhGwaPoCA

[Allhallowsday]

sux

[RCMerchant]

sux

Of course he "sux"!


(In a Bela voice) "It's my job, it's what I do!"

[Allhallowsday]

BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHA...!!!

[Svengoolie 3]

No dracula can be worse than this.

[Svengoolie 3]

But there is at least some competition...