Rottentomatoes: Worst of the Worst

[Scott]

Here is Rottentomatoes: Worst of the Worst countdown.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/features/special/2007/wotw/

[peter johnson]

How do you navigate the site?
I click, and all I get is a 10movie set, which won't give me the 10 WITHIN the set --
Re.  I can't find an actual list of the 100 --
???
thankyou
peter j./denny c.

[soylentgreen]

I hear you, Peter...the layout is rather terrible.  I give it a *SPLAT*!

While art is always subjective(a true Bad Movies fan defense! ), some things on that 'Worst' list are so bad, just seeing them in the list forced me to remember that they had even existed.

Take JOHN TUCKER MUST DIE....you know it's a problem when you've got a boat-load of hot teen chicks floating around and the only thing that blows is the damn film itself!

[Poogie]

How do you navigate the site?
I click, and all I get is a 10movie set, which won't give me the 10 WITHIN the set --
Re.  I can't find an actual list of the 100 --
???
thankyou
peter j./denny c.

Move down to where it says "Start worst picture count down" click, move back up and you'll see the numbers. I just clicked on each number or next.....At least that's what I did. I might be wrong.   

[fortunato]

It's an interesting list, but the bottom ten have all been made within the last ten years or so.

[peter johnson]

Bottom ten?
How about all of them?
They even have "23" on here . . . "23" just came out!!  It's still NEW in the theatres -- How is it possible that this film could make a "100 Worst-reviewed of all time" list?
You have to let things SET for awhile befo' you be sayin' on them -- knwawamean?
It seems to be a list without merit.  I can find a dozen worse film reviews from the popular press of the 1930's for films now considered classics. 
peter johnson/denny crane

[RCMerchant]

Bottom ten?
How about all of them?
They even have "23" on here . . . "23" just came out!!  It's still NEW in the theatres -- How is it possible that this film could make a "100 Worst-reviewed of all time" list?
You have to let things SET for awhile befo' you be sayin' on them -- knwawamean?
It seems to be a list without merit.  I can find a dozen worse film reviews from the popular press of the 1930's for films now considered classics. 
peter johnson/denny crane

  Thats a big 10-4!!!! I don't think rottontomatos is qualified . A "worst of ALL time"? granted,I'm sure these movies suck,but fer the love of  all we hold dear...those people must be taking a poll from yer mass market MTV2 generation collage kids with not a clue of the vast history of BAD movies! BAH! I spit on the rotton list! PTOOIE!!!

[Andrew]

From what I saw, they are giving critics in their system the ability to cast votes.  Since most critics are going to be the type that review mainstream movies, the list is going to deviate a lot from what hardcore fans of trash cinema enjoy.  Looking at some of the lists in the other thread (10 bad movies everyone should see before they die), I think we could make a pretty good list of "pure, unadulterated cinematic pain" here.

[ulthar]

The only one of the bottom 10 I've even seen is TWISTED.  It was pretty bad, but in the whole scope of movies that exist, not the 8th worse movie ever made.  Pretty much forgettable, so it cannot stand out as something so-bad-it's-memorably-bad.

[BeyondTheGrave]

I can't believe Alone in the Dark got number 2. While it was typical Uwe Boll crap it shold not be number 2.

[BoyScoutKevin]

I haven't seen any of them. Wait, I have, too. I've seen two of them: "Corky Romano" and "Out Cold," As interesting as the list is, I agree with Andrew, the posters at this site can come up with a better list of pure, unadulterated, painful films, then the films listed there.