Main Menu

Frodo's for real!

Started by Fausto, May 06, 2009, 08:36:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Fausto

"When I die, I hope you will use my body creatively." - Shin Chan

"Tonight, we will honor the greatest writers in America with a modest 9 by 12 certificate and a check for three thousand dollars...three thousand dollars? Stephen King makes more than that for writing boo on a cocktail napkin." - Jimmy Breslin

Joe the Destroyer

Wow, and The Shire was in Indonesia? 

RCMerchant

Not surprising. A tiny human mummy was found in 1932 in Wyoming.....heres the details-


http://www.soul-guidance.com/houseofthesun/notesweris.htm

This makes me look tall. (I'm 5'2")
Supernatural?...perhaps. Baloney?...Perhaps not!" Bela Lugosi-the BLACK CAT (1934)
Interviewer-"Does Dracula ever end for you?
Lugosi-"No. Dracula-never ends."
Slobber, Drool, Drip!
https://www.tumblr.com/ronmerchant

Jack

I'm confused as to why they're saying that something 1/3rd the size of a human wouldn't be smart enough to make and use tools, etc.  A 9 or 10 year old child weighs about 65 lbs., and they can use sticks and stuff like that.
The world is changed by your example, not by your opinion.

- Paulo Coelho

Jim H

Quote from: Jack on May 07, 2009, 07:30:42 AM
I'm confused as to why they're saying that something 1/3rd the size of a human wouldn't be smart enough to make and use tools, etc.  A 9 or 10 year old child weighs about 65 lbs., and they can use sticks and stuff like that.

Not to mention a crow is WAY smarter than many animals far bigger than it.  Same deal with parrots.  Brain mass VS total weight is a better indicator of intelligence than brain size, as otherwise wouldn't elephants and whales be a LOT smarter than people?

The do mention that their brain size is 1/3 the size of a modern human, but they are bigger than 1/3 the size of a modern human (I'd say worldwide average human weight is what, 140 pounds?, VS these guys at 65).  Regardless though, it's worth noting they've recently proven chimps have the capability to learn to flintknap, so the whole argument seems a bit silly.