Main Menu

OMG!!!

Started by Neville, April 11, 2006, 11:14:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1 2
User actions

Neville

April 11, 2006, 11:14:46 AM
Due to the horrifying nature of this film, no one will be admitted to the theatre.

The Burgomaster

#1
April 11, 2006, 12:02:47 PM
I guess NIGHT OF THE LEPUS wasn't so dumb after all . . .
"Do not walk behind me, for I may not lead. Do not walk ahead of me, for I may not follow. Do not walk beside me either. Just pretty much leave me the hell alone."

AndyC

#2
April 11, 2006, 12:31:54 PM
Jeez, that thing looks about the size of my dogs, although I suspect a bit of wide-angle lens trickery is exaggerating it. Just the same, I've never heard of rabbits that big.
---------------------
"Join me in the abyss of savings."

akiratubo

#3
April 11, 2006, 05:31:15 PM
He's holding it close to the camera to make it look bigger, the same as fishermen will do with their catch.

Even so, it's obviously one huge rabbit.
Kneel before Dr. Hell, the ruler of this world!

zombie no.one

#4
April 11, 2006, 06:08:40 PM
surely at some point someone must have made a bad movie titled "Night Of The Incredible Giant Were-Rabbit" or something similar...it has to exist.

peter johnson

#5
April 11, 2006, 10:22:53 PM
This bunny is 100% real -- It is of a known breed called a Continental Giant.  It eats 4 lbs of cabbage and rabbit food a day.  The breed is known for its docility -- Thank God!!  The biggest Continental Giant known is 37lbs.  This rabbit here of Karl's is a mere 22lbs.
Try to pick up the June, 2006 issue of Fortean Times magazine for more pictures & other rabbit tales.
Go Team Lepus!!!
peter johnson/denny crane
I have no idea what this means.

Ash

#6
April 12, 2006, 12:40:07 AM

plan9superfan

#7
April 12, 2006, 04:42:55 AM
I'm confused.

Is this "Continental Bunny" a Were-Rabbit (from the Wallace and Gromit movie) or a mutated rabbit from "Night of the Lepus"?

AndyC

#8
April 12, 2006, 07:56:59 AM
I think bigger breeds of animals are generally more docile than their smaller relatives. Like comparing a Jack Russell Terrier to a St. Bernard.

I wonder what the Continental Giant is bred for? I suppose a bigger rabbit would be desirable for both more meat and a bigger pelt. From a meat standpoint, I wonder how economical it is (food eaten vs. weight gained) compared to smaller rabbits.
---------------------
"Join me in the abyss of savings."

odinn7

#9
April 12, 2006, 01:51:54 PM
Covered in chocolate...I bet they taste great.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

You're not the Devil...You're practice.

Alan Smithee

#10
April 12, 2006, 11:50:51 PM
Reminds me of the time when I was little riding with my Grandma in the car on the way to church when we spot a dead rabbit in the road and she says 'There's the Easter Bunny".

Flangepart

#11
April 14, 2006, 11:46:03 AM
Dude....cruel grandma.

To me , rabbit is not "Kosher", but i bet i'd make good dog/cat food. And the pelts are warm clove lineing.
But, yikes! Even a 22lb killer bunny would keep Arther and his Knights at bay!
"Aggressivlly eccentric, and proud of it!"

plan9superfan

#12
April 15, 2006, 05:21:06 AM
Mind you, that was a MAN-EATING rabbit, unlike this one.

Flangepart

#13
April 17, 2006, 11:49:54 AM
True, but maby they just start with the vegies....
"Aggressivlly eccentric, and proud of it!"

Ash

#14
April 17, 2006, 01:18:48 PM


Damn!
I'd like to put one of those rabbits in a headlock and see what it does.
I wonder if it would put up a good fight.

Nice bunny!
Print
Go Up Pages1 2
User actions