Buh bye, Trump

[Alex]

Zelmo- your credibility on this board is close to zero. Quit while your ahead.

RC, don't forget that he did declare that anyone who posted links from a particular news source has no credibility only to have it pointed out to him that it was a source he himself had linked. I think you overestimate his credibility.

[RCMerchant]

I know, Alex. 
He just likes to push buttons.

[Alex]

He does push the one that makes me laugh at him a lot.

[RCMerchant]

He's crazy as a bed bug. If he had any brains he would be dangerous. He couldn't tell s**t from apple butter.If he had twins he would ask the doctor "Which one is mine?"

When he was born the doctor turned him over to slap his ass and said "twins!"

[Alex]

Remind you of anyone?

[zelmo73]

So you don't think that someone who was there and took part in the events should be called to testify. I almost fell off my chair laughing at that. Good job you are not a lawyer.

Did you even read the article?

"For people like Jake, for millions of Americans, they truly did hang on every word of their president, our president, the person that we permitted day-in, day-out to speak to us in ways and in fashions that simply weren't true," Watkins told CNN's Chris Cuomo.

Watkins went on to describe the "process of unwinding" that his client had to go through while he was in police custody - which he likened to being deprogrammed from a cult.

A brainwashed dildo testifying against the guy that "brainwashed" him, undoubtedly cutting a deal to reduce his jail time. This entire "trial" is a big f'ing joke, and the fact that you are lending credence to this nimrod only makes you look like the bigger fool. "Oh poor me! Trump made me attack the Capitol Building! Please disregard the fact that the FBI knew about the attack months in advance," said the QAnon Shaman. 

Yes I read the article. It doesn't actually mention them summoning him as a witness, just that he was willing to testify and thus in no way backs up your arguement.

I didn't say that he was testifying either, I was merely answering your question. Perhaps you need to cite the definition of the term "cutting a deal" in order to comprehend what I'm saying?

Offer or arrange an agreement or compromise, as in "The administration is hoping to cut a deal with Japan". This expression uses deal in the sense of "business transaction." [Colloquial; 1970s]

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/cut--a--deal

[Alex]

One of those "credible witnesses", eh? They seriously considering bringing in a guy who just attacked the building last month to testify on their behalf? Yeah, what could possibly go wrong?  

Ah, but you did. I've even highlighted it for your convenience. Kind of indicates you believe that that they are going to use him as a witness. It doesn't say that they are doing that in the article, as I mentioned before, but let's face it you do have a track record for reading things into comments that aren't there, so you'll have to excuse the rest of us if we kind of have to point these obvious things out to you.

[zelmo73]

One of those "credible witnesses", eh? They seriously considering bringing in a guy who just attacked the building last month to testify on their behalf? Yeah, what could possibly go wrong?  

Ah, but you did. I've even highlighted it for your convenience. Kind of indicates you believe that that they are going to use him as a witness. It doesn't say that they are doing that in the article, as I mentioned before, but let's face it you do have a track record for reading things into comments that aren't there, so you'll have to excuse the rest of us if we kind of have to point these obvious things out to you.

Since when is a question mark *?* a statement, Alex? I asked if they were seriously considering bringing in a guy that just attacked the Capitol building to testify on their behalf, and then *you* asked me if I don't think that a person that was there and took part in the events should be called in to testify. So you apparently believe that this moron is a credible witness because Orange Man Bad convinced him to do something that day. Odd considering that the FBI had apparently known that QAnon Shaman was going to do something there months in advance.  

I see what you are trying to do here, Alex. Your problem is that you are not as smart as you like to think that you are.  

[Leah]

Don't worry your head off Zelmo, I see what you're doing. 

[RCMerchant]

Myself- meh. f**k Zelmo and everything he stands up for.
f**k cockroaches and bed bugs too! And lady bugs! f**k them too!
( I'm sorry what I said about lady bugs. They get annoying in the time of year when all of a sudden they want to attack my house, but they don't do any real problem. Lady bugs.)

[Alex]

One of those "credible witnesses", eh? They seriously considering bringing in a guy who just attacked the building last month to testify on their behalf? Yeah, what could possibly go wrong?  

Ah, but you did. I've even highlighted it for your convenience. Kind of indicates you believe that that they are going to use him as a witness. It doesn't say that they are doing that in the article, as I mentioned before, but let's face it you do have a track record for reading things into comments that aren't there, so you'll have to excuse the rest of us if we kind of have to point these obvious things out to you.

Since when is a question mark *?* a statement, Alex? I asked if they were seriously considering bringing in a guy that just attacked the Capitol building to testify on their behalf, and then *you* asked me if I don't think that a person that was there and took part in the events should be called in to testify. So you apparently believe that this moron is a credible witness because Orange Man Bad convinced him to do something that day. Odd considering that the FBI had apparently known that QAnon Shaman was going to do something there months in advance.  

I see what you are trying to do here, Alex. Your problem is that you are not as smart as you like to think that you are.  

Oh I am as smart as I think I am. Not genius level, but hey I am smarter than you, which is one of the reasons I don't take you seriously. Go through your old posts, have a look at the number of times you've been wrong if you need some proof. I mean you are the guy who thought he was blowing peoples minds when all he was doing was providing amusement, you said trump would win the election, you've claimed a worldwide pandemic is no big deal regardless of the number of people it kills. There isn't much right about you at all.

If by saying you see what I am trying to do, if you mean mocking you and having a laugh at your expense then yes, you'd be right.

One thing to remember, the QAnon shaman supported the same guy you did. He also agrees with you on Covid and vaccines. Not credible indeed. The more you denounce him, the more you denounce your own beliefs.   

[indianasmith]

Myself- meh. f**k Zelmo and everything he stands up for.
f**k cockroaches and bed bugs too! And lady bugs! f**k them too!
( I'm sorry what I said about lady bugs. They get annoying in the time of year when all of a sudden they want to attack my house, but they don't do any real problem. Lady bugs.)

Are you still OK with gentleman bugs?

[RCMerchant]

^ If they keep the lady bugs busy ballroom dancing and not clinging to my kitchen window- yeah!

[Rev. Powell]

Reminder: no personal attacks. That's when we cross from debate into flamewar and locked thread.

[RCMerchant]

I  retract all my vile s**t I said about lady bugs.
I love ladybugs. I want them to cover my body and seep into all my orfices.
Like the cockroaches in CREEPSHOW!