- Welcome to Badmovies.org Forum.
Recent posts
#1
Bad Movies / Re: The Mandela Effect in movi...
Last post by Trevor - Today at 04:43:16 AMQuote from: Trevor on April 24, 2026, 09:15:38 AMIn other words, scenes in movies, which you either don't remember right or which weren't there to begin with.
My ME moment is from SOLDIER BLUE.
I haven't seen it since 1983 but I seem to remember a scene with Candice Bergen sitting holding a child and, when she lets the child go, the child's guts spill out.😳
I hope that was me misremembering a scene 😳😳😳
I found it online at ok.ru.
Candice is holding a dead child, the ground is scattered with corpses, and Peter Strauss throws up on camera.
I did misremember the scene.
#2
Bad Movies / Re: The Mandela Effect in movi...
Last post by claws - Today at 04:24:29 AMQuoteThe "Shazaam" Mandela effect is a prominent false memory where many people vividly recall 1990s comedian Sinbad playing a genie in a movie named Shazaam. This film does not exist. The memory is a confusion with the real 1996 film Kazaam, starring Shaquille O'Neal as a genie, or a costume Sinbad wore during a Sinbad the Sailor marathon.
Its interesting how one person's claim (Intentional or not) can open a social media avalance of a false memory for thousands. Typically, they created fake Shazaam VHS tapes, adding fuel to the confusion.
Mandela Effect? Not a movie scene, but... All week at work, I had this cheesy, dramatic 1970s song playing in my head called "Dear Michael" by Michael Jackson. I honestly thought I'd made it up. It felt like the perfect "lost" MJ track. After a few days, I convinced myself the idea was too good to be true. I finally looked up his early solo work yesterday and, sure enough, there it was on his 1975 album. I haven't heard that song in ages, but my brain apparently held onto it all this time!
#3
Bad Movies / Re: The Mandela Effect in movi...
Last post by Trevor - Today at 03:40:42 AMQuote from: chainsaw midget on April 24, 2026, 11:11:05 AMGhostbusters II.
Me and a TON of other people SWEAR that at the very end of the movie, it shows Slimer flying out of the Statue of Liberty and right at the screen.
Nobody is able to find the footage of this anywhere.
HOWEVER.... the scene is show ... in a coloring book adaption. So it had to have existed in some format. Right?
I saw GHOSTBUSTERS 2 in the theater way back when. Never saw that ending.
Slimer does have his / its own credit at the end of this: maybe they're confusing that with the way the original GHOSTBUSTERS ends? 🤔
#4
Entertainment / Re: Bands/ Artists You Don't H...
Last post by lester1/2jr - April 24, 2026, 11:53:18 PMThe p***ycat Dolls
#5
Off Topic Discussion / Re: People you find overrated?
Last post by HappyGilmore - April 24, 2026, 07:29:11 PMQuote from: Leah on April 23, 2026, 09:16:14 AMI'll probably get s**t for this but Steve Perry, former vocalist of Journey. I honestly don't see why people love his vocals, I just find them grating. This is not me being a metal head either, I do listen to other music genres as well. I just cannot stand his vocals.I'm not a huge fan. I like a few songs.
Couldn't sit there for hours though to listen
#7
Off Topic Discussion / Re: Random Statements About So...
Last post by Rev. Powell - April 24, 2026, 05:24:45 PMQuote from: zombie no.one on April 24, 2026, 02:32:17 PMjust watched a vid by a comedian called Jim Breuer. apparently he's big stuff? he's like someone's mentally slow uncle gatecrashing a barbequeue.
He's not huge, but he's known from Saturday Night Live in the late 90s, same time as Will Ferrel. I neither liked nor disliked him. He had a stoner persona (when he was younger, at least, maybe now he's a slow uncle).
#8
Off Topic Discussion / Re: Memes n' stuff of the day
Last post by LilCerberus - April 24, 2026, 05:23:36 PM
#9
Good Movies / Re: Recent Viewings, Part 2
Last post by lester1/2jr - April 24, 2026, 04:39:04 PMGolgatha (1935) - Yet another movie about Christ's crucifixion and resurrection (sorry for the spoiler). This one is pretty darn straightforward, if not as colorful as "The Sign of the Cross" or something. It includes Jesus standing before Herod from the Gospel of Luke (which most movies don't have), and also shows him before the Sanhedrin and Pilate, so a lot of standing going on. The main way it distinguishes itself is how it goes into detail about, say, the circumstances around the resurrection with the guards and Joseph of Arimathea and so forth. The writer really knows the New Testament and has something they want to say about the whole thing.
It certainly succeeds on an academic level, but there were some powerful cinematic moments as well. That said, you could also see it as just another retelling of a familiar story. Also, when Judas betrays Jesus they do a gratuitous profile of his huge nose, which other film makers have done. They were ALL Jewish, buddy. I appreciated the lack of modernity and the sobriety of the presentation. Ultimately though, it's probably not of much interest to anyone who's not a huge bible geek, like myself.
4.5 /5 It would have needed to really bring something new and crazy or have more intense performances to get a 5, but it's pretty top tier.
It certainly succeeds on an academic level, but there were some powerful cinematic moments as well. That said, you could also see it as just another retelling of a familiar story. Also, when Judas betrays Jesus they do a gratuitous profile of his huge nose, which other film makers have done. They were ALL Jewish, buddy. I appreciated the lack of modernity and the sobriety of the presentation. Ultimately though, it's probably not of much interest to anyone who's not a huge bible geek, like myself.
4.5 /5 It would have needed to really bring something new and crazy or have more intense performances to get a 5, but it's pretty top tier.
#10
Bad Movies / Re: RECENT VIEWINGS (Bad Movie...
Last post by M.10rda - April 24, 2026, 02:48:11 PMLIANE, JUNGLE GODDESS (1956):
Some claim this nominally-titillating but realistically quite tame potboiler is based on a true story though I am dubious. (It's the same "true story" as Jess Franco's WHITE CANNIBAL QUEEN, surely!) German scientists (?!) deep in the jungles of Africa (...) happen across a teenage girl in leopard (or giraffe?)-skin shorts with long blonde hair that conveniently clings to/obscures her nipples like she was painted by Boris Vallejo or something. It would be a stretch to say that Liane (pronounced "LEE-Uh-Ne" instead of "Lee-AH-nee" or "Lee-ANN") is treated like a "goddess" by the natives (really only one guy seems smitten with her and the rest of them just tolerate her illogical presence) but that's exploitation marketing for ya'. Because they're a bunch of white guys (and one lady), the Germans decide they must rescue Liane (who is perfectly happy in Africa) and return her to Europe, where a rich old politician thinks she might be his long-lost granddaughter but the politician's sinister aide (played by Reggie Nalder, hence we know he's Sinister) wants to kidnap Liane because Something. It mostly moves along at a reasonable pace and isn't unpleasant to endure!
In spite of mondo-style footage of animals (including identical shots that appear twice), there's fortunately no bloodshed in LJG. The film opens with found footage of full-frontal nudity from unidentified African women (and then there's a bit more later) which was totally okay with censors in the 50s I guess, but of course the wardrobe and crew go to great lengths to mostly protect Liane from ever being visibly topless. (Supposedly there was one shot of her exposed breasts that is missing from many/most/all prints, including mine: Liane trips and falls forward in one shot and her hair flies up and it looks like she will be on full display, but a jump cut omits several frames which I must presume ended up in the personal collection of some greasy old projectionist somewhere.) Honestly that's perfectly fine, because when one gets a good look at Marion Michael as Liane, one realizes she looks entirely too young to be appearing nude. (Michael was 15 or 16 when she shot the film, which wasn't too weird in Europe at the time, but she uhhh looks younger to me...) In fact I got alarmed when the German nurse cuts her hair into a sub-shoulder-length bob - what then would protect Liane's modesty? But fortunately she wears real clothes for most of the rest of the film.
Its approach to nudity isn't the only wonky or objectionable thing about LJG. A pushy German tries to sexually assault the nurse early in the film and later gets real-trigger happy towards the Africans, so one might expect him to be the Big Bad and ultimately get killed or defeated - but nope, everyone just overlooks his crimes! There's also a romance initially hinted at between Safari Hunk Hardy Kruger (who would later steal the show w/ his psychotic performance in FLIGHT OF THE PHOENIX) and the Nurse, but as soon as blonde-haired Hardy lays his blue eyes on little Liane, they're inseparable for the rest of the film. (At least this doesn't go unnoticed by the Nurse - who is actually foxier than Liane and an adult to boot! - or the other Germans, who seem to recognize that Liane is way too young for Hardy...) The film ends with Hardy and Liane stripping down to their birthday suits and swimming starkers like some kind of Aryan fantasy.
The water mostly blurs any of Liane's naughty bits in this scene and her earlier, totally gratuitous nude bathing scene... though young viewers in a pre-internet age probably wore out the "Pause" buttons on any VHS dubs........
"Young" Reggie Nalder is almost kind of normal-looking, BTW... almost like Henry Silva.
2/5 TBH the highlights of the film are several moments where Liane is seen playing with lion cubs and, in two puzzling shots, a tiger cub. 
...A tiger cub being, of course, every bit as lost in an African jungle as a blonde teenager.
Some claim this nominally-titillating but realistically quite tame potboiler is based on a true story though I am dubious. (It's the same "true story" as Jess Franco's WHITE CANNIBAL QUEEN, surely!) German scientists (?!) deep in the jungles of Africa (...) happen across a teenage girl in leopard (or giraffe?)-skin shorts with long blonde hair that conveniently clings to/obscures her nipples like she was painted by Boris Vallejo or something. It would be a stretch to say that Liane (pronounced "LEE-Uh-Ne" instead of "Lee-AH-nee" or "Lee-ANN") is treated like a "goddess" by the natives (really only one guy seems smitten with her and the rest of them just tolerate her illogical presence) but that's exploitation marketing for ya'. Because they're a bunch of white guys (and one lady), the Germans decide they must rescue Liane (who is perfectly happy in Africa) and return her to Europe, where a rich old politician thinks she might be his long-lost granddaughter but the politician's sinister aide (played by Reggie Nalder, hence we know he's Sinister) wants to kidnap Liane because Something. It mostly moves along at a reasonable pace and isn't unpleasant to endure!
In spite of mondo-style footage of animals (including identical shots that appear twice), there's fortunately no bloodshed in LJG. The film opens with found footage of full-frontal nudity from unidentified African women (and then there's a bit more later) which was totally okay with censors in the 50s I guess, but of course the wardrobe and crew go to great lengths to mostly protect Liane from ever being visibly topless. (Supposedly there was one shot of her exposed breasts that is missing from many/most/all prints, including mine: Liane trips and falls forward in one shot and her hair flies up and it looks like she will be on full display, but a jump cut omits several frames which I must presume ended up in the personal collection of some greasy old projectionist somewhere.) Honestly that's perfectly fine, because when one gets a good look at Marion Michael as Liane, one realizes she looks entirely too young to be appearing nude. (Michael was 15 or 16 when she shot the film, which wasn't too weird in Europe at the time, but she uhhh looks younger to me...) In fact I got alarmed when the German nurse cuts her hair into a sub-shoulder-length bob - what then would protect Liane's modesty? But fortunately she wears real clothes for most of the rest of the film.
Its approach to nudity isn't the only wonky or objectionable thing about LJG. A pushy German tries to sexually assault the nurse early in the film and later gets real-trigger happy towards the Africans, so one might expect him to be the Big Bad and ultimately get killed or defeated - but nope, everyone just overlooks his crimes! There's also a romance initially hinted at between Safari Hunk Hardy Kruger (who would later steal the show w/ his psychotic performance in FLIGHT OF THE PHOENIX) and the Nurse, but as soon as blonde-haired Hardy lays his blue eyes on little Liane, they're inseparable for the rest of the film. (At least this doesn't go unnoticed by the Nurse - who is actually foxier than Liane and an adult to boot! - or the other Germans, who seem to recognize that Liane is way too young for Hardy...) The film ends with Hardy and Liane stripping down to their birthday suits and swimming starkers like some kind of Aryan fantasy.
The water mostly blurs any of Liane's naughty bits in this scene and her earlier, totally gratuitous nude bathing scene... though young viewers in a pre-internet age probably wore out the "Pause" buttons on any VHS dubs........ "Young" Reggie Nalder is almost kind of normal-looking, BTW... almost like Henry Silva.
2/5 TBH the highlights of the film are several moments where Liane is seen playing with lion cubs and, in two puzzling shots, a tiger cub. ...A tiger cub being, of course, every bit as lost in an African jungle as a blonde teenager.