- Welcome to Badmovies.org Forum.
Recent posts
#1
Humorous Captions / Hey, let's hurry up and finish...
Last post by sprite75 - Today at 04:34:48 PM
Hey, let's hurry up and finish this. I wanna get home and binge watch those last few seasons of Matlock!
#2
Good Movies / Re: Recent Viewings, Part 2
Last post by lester1/2jr - Today at 04:04:37 PMSomething (2018) - Another day, another Tubi obscurity. As with "True Nature" from 2 nights ago, it's understood that this is not going to be a fully fleshed out and living Hollywood movie. It's more of an "If you're up for it, take the plunge" kind of thing. The dialogue, which the movie relies VERY heavily on, is about 10-20 IQ points below where it needs to be, unless you enjoy watching two dull people say very predictable things. Even for a demo tape type movie, it's a little perfunctory and colorless.
Overwhelmed newlyweds now have another problem: an unwanted visitor who menacingly walks in front of their baby monitor screen then seemingly disappears. or is the monitor being hacked by someone who is menacingly hacking it, for some reason? or is it all in their heads?
I enjoyed this a little more than True Nature because it was a lot more plausible. As a bonus, Eric Roberts takes a break from Lifetime "My Dentist is a Pervert" roles to show how it's done as some sort of police guy.
4.15/ 5 These things should be in a Mill Creek style boxed set.
Overwhelmed newlyweds now have another problem: an unwanted visitor who menacingly walks in front of their baby monitor screen then seemingly disappears. or is the monitor being hacked by someone who is menacingly hacking it, for some reason? or is it all in their heads?
I enjoyed this a little more than True Nature because it was a lot more plausible. As a bonus, Eric Roberts takes a break from Lifetime "My Dentist is a Pervert" roles to show how it's done as some sort of police guy.
4.15/ 5 These things should be in a Mill Creek style boxed set.
#3
Off Topic Discussion / Re: Picture of the day, part I...
Last post by Rev. Powell - Today at 11:57:07 AM
#4
Off Topic Discussion / Re: The New Happy Birthday Thr...
Last post by Trevor - Today at 09:49:00 AMQuote from: Rev. Powell on Today at 09:32:29 AMHappy birthday Trevor!
Thanks Rev 🙂🐢
#5
Off Topic Discussion / Re: The New Happy Birthday Thr...
Last post by Rev. Powell - Today at 09:32:29 AMHappy birthday Trevor!
#6
Bad Movies / Re: Invent A Bad Movie Title P...
Last post by LilCerberus - Today at 09:06:48 AMLovercraft
A movie about an amorous witch who picks up guys in her hovercraft, & keeps re-reading Shadow Over Innsmouth
A movie about an amorous witch who picks up guys in her hovercraft, & keeps re-reading Shadow Over Innsmouth
#8
Games / Re: Answer the question with a...
Last post by Rev. Powell - Today at 08:57:32 AM
Hey man, where you been this past year?
#9
Good Movies / Re: Recent Viewings, Part 2
Last post by M.10rda - Today at 08:18:16 AMTHE KNOCKOUT (1914/1916?):
This is a rare early Roscoe Arbuckle vehicle shrouded in mystery. Roscoe stars in it w/o Buster but w/ Al St. John in a supporting role and w/ Charlie Chaplin in a pivotal cameo. It's longer than most other Roscoe shorts (30 whole minutes!) and no one seems to agree on who was behind the camera. Some sources claim it was directed by Mack Sennett (who produced it and has a cameo) and some claim it was directed by a minor silent actor/director named Charles Avery, who also appears. Letterboxd claims that Chaplin wrote it, though he only appears in one scene and he didn't write any other films for Arbuckle. No one seems to think Roscoe wrote or directed it - though he wrote and directed almost everything else he starred in by 1916, which is why some sources claim KNOCKOUT was made in 1914. But the FATTY & MABEL movies from 1914 (w/d by Sennett) are incredibly primitive and uneventful/boring, and the Sennett/Chaplin project THE FATAL MALLET from 1914 is repetitive and moronic. THE KNOCKOUT, however, is complex, professionally assembled, and climaxes in 10 minutes of ambitiously staged sprawling chaos - all hallmarks of Roscoe-as-auteur.
Roscoe is a seemingly nice dude named "Pug" who has a hot girlfriend played by the cute and lively Minta Durfee. Because Pug is a heavier guy and his girlfriend's a hottie, he's constantly fighting groups of dudes for her honor. I'd say he's justified when they start hurling bricks at Pug and Minta, and Minta is hit in the face by one. Pug starts swingin' and even lifting dudes above his head and throwin' 'em. More bodies fly through the air in THE KNOCKOUT than in an average issue of Jack Kirby's "Tales of Suspense".
For complicated plot reasons that are elaborated upon in the film but really unimportant, tough Pug is enlisted to enter the ring against a heavyweight boxer. Little Charlie Chaplin is the ref and gets knocked around a lot in the process. In spite of the film's title, the boxing match itself doesn't end in a K.O. and really the boxing is wholly tangential. Because -
In its final third, Pug flies into a literal psychopathic/homicidal rage, pulls out two handguns (Chow Yun-Fatt style) in the ring, and proceeds to pursue his opponent out of the arena and through the city, dual-wielding the pistols while still wearing boxing gloves and firing hundreds of rounds but never reloading.
This kind of insane gunplay is a fixture in multiple Arbuckle films and somehow never gets less absurdly funny. (As usual, someone gets shot in the backside.) The police respond en masse, pursuing Roscoe to little avail. Innocent bystanders are inconvenienced and enraged (but not wounded by stray rounds). The chase escalates onto and over the tops of tall buildings - and watching big Roscoe participating in a classic thriller rooftop chase is a singular sight indeed. Things get even more ridiculous by the end. Well, this one's pure Arbuckle.
4/5 If other Sennett and Chaplin films were like this, I'd be watching dozens of Sennett and Chaplin films instead of dozens of Arbuckle films, wouldn't I?
This is a rare early Roscoe Arbuckle vehicle shrouded in mystery. Roscoe stars in it w/o Buster but w/ Al St. John in a supporting role and w/ Charlie Chaplin in a pivotal cameo. It's longer than most other Roscoe shorts (30 whole minutes!) and no one seems to agree on who was behind the camera. Some sources claim it was directed by Mack Sennett (who produced it and has a cameo) and some claim it was directed by a minor silent actor/director named Charles Avery, who also appears. Letterboxd claims that Chaplin wrote it, though he only appears in one scene and he didn't write any other films for Arbuckle. No one seems to think Roscoe wrote or directed it - though he wrote and directed almost everything else he starred in by 1916, which is why some sources claim KNOCKOUT was made in 1914. But the FATTY & MABEL movies from 1914 (w/d by Sennett) are incredibly primitive and uneventful/boring, and the Sennett/Chaplin project THE FATAL MALLET from 1914 is repetitive and moronic. THE KNOCKOUT, however, is complex, professionally assembled, and climaxes in 10 minutes of ambitiously staged sprawling chaos - all hallmarks of Roscoe-as-auteur.
Roscoe is a seemingly nice dude named "Pug" who has a hot girlfriend played by the cute and lively Minta Durfee. Because Pug is a heavier guy and his girlfriend's a hottie, he's constantly fighting groups of dudes for her honor. I'd say he's justified when they start hurling bricks at Pug and Minta, and Minta is hit in the face by one. Pug starts swingin' and even lifting dudes above his head and throwin' 'em. More bodies fly through the air in THE KNOCKOUT than in an average issue of Jack Kirby's "Tales of Suspense".
For complicated plot reasons that are elaborated upon in the film but really unimportant, tough Pug is enlisted to enter the ring against a heavyweight boxer. Little Charlie Chaplin is the ref and gets knocked around a lot in the process. In spite of the film's title, the boxing match itself doesn't end in a K.O. and really the boxing is wholly tangential. Because -
In its final third, Pug flies into a literal psychopathic/homicidal rage, pulls out two handguns (Chow Yun-Fatt style) in the ring, and proceeds to pursue his opponent out of the arena and through the city, dual-wielding the pistols while still wearing boxing gloves and firing hundreds of rounds but never reloading.
This kind of insane gunplay is a fixture in multiple Arbuckle films and somehow never gets less absurdly funny. (As usual, someone gets shot in the backside.) The police respond en masse, pursuing Roscoe to little avail. Innocent bystanders are inconvenienced and enraged (but not wounded by stray rounds). The chase escalates onto and over the tops of tall buildings - and watching big Roscoe participating in a classic thriller rooftop chase is a singular sight indeed. Things get even more ridiculous by the end. Well, this one's pure Arbuckle.4/5 If other Sennett and Chaplin films were like this, I'd be watching dozens of Sennett and Chaplin films instead of dozens of Arbuckle films, wouldn't I?
#10
Television / Re: Joel sells out!
Last post by Rev. Powell - Today at 08:12:32 AMI don't think I'd count those as spoilers. I know this is subjective, but how would you rank this episode compared to previous seasons? I have relatively low expectations, I don't expect them to recapture top form. I'm hoping the best episodes will be as entertaining as an average episode from the sci-fi era, and at least as good as the episodes from the reboot's first season.