Quote from: M.10rda on April 18, 2026, 03:07:22 PMI watched DECAMERON last year or the year prior and I hated it, too. I think I rated it 1/5 or 0.5/5. My review was much more cruel than yours! However -Quote from: Dr. Whom on April 18, 2026, 03:09:01 AMIl Decameron (1971)
These stories could be very funny, if done with a slapstick Benny Hill/Carry On approach.
I didn't intend to be mean. I was just talking about the source material. Way back, when I was taking my degree in Medieval History I did a course on Chaucer's fabliaux, so I read a number of them. These are rowdy knockabout farces very much in the spirit of Benny Hill or 70s sex comedies. So if you adapt them, it should be in this spirit, and not try to make Serious Art.
It is what I like to call the Carl Orff effect. If you read the Carmina Burana, you find that they are very frivolous: about students partying, and chasing girls, or spending all their money on drink and pleading with their patron not to cut them off. Yet if you hear the orchestration of Orff, you might be forgiven for thinking that the end of the world had arrived.
.......That line is a masterpiece of meanness - I salute you!It's funny 'cause it's true, too. Watching BH or CO would be more "fun" than this Pasolini arthouse movie!
Quote from: lester1/2jr on March 09, 2015, 04:35:52 PMJessica Alba looked really good in Idle Hands
Quote from: Dr. Whom on April 18, 2026, 03:09:01 AMIl Decameron (1971)
These stories could be very funny, if done with a slapstick Benny Hill/Carry On approach.
It's funny 'cause it's true, too. Watching BH or CO would be more "fun" than this Pasolini arthouse movie!
Quote from: claws on April 18, 2026, 01:42:25 AMIt's strange how my weather app uses borderline orgasmic language to describe its excitement over rising temperatures. I understand they need to provide some flavor text with the forecast, but I really wish they'd stick to a neutral, professional tone.
On top of the hyperbole, they've started using the term "blood rain" constantly this year. It sounds more like a B-movie title than a forecast. I actually had to look it up, and according to the definition:
"Blood rain occurs when high concentrations of red-colored dust or particles mix with rain, giving it a red appearance as it falls. It is not actually a meteorological or scientific term; rather, it's a colloquial phrase that dates back quite a while."
Since it isn't even a scientific term, it's no wonder I've never heard it in legitimate weather news before. I'm not sure why my app is so insistent on using it, I suppose they're just trying to stand out from the competition with "edgier" branding, but it mostly just feels unnecessary.