- Welcome to Badmovies.org Forum.
Recent posts
#1
Good Movies / Re: Recent Viewings, Part 2
Last post by M.10rda - Today at 08:18:16 AMTHE KNOCKOUT (1914/1916?):
This is a rare early Roscoe Arbuckle vehicle shrouded in mystery. Roscoe stars in it w/o Buster but w/ Al St. John in a supporting role and w/ Charlie Chaplin in a pivotal cameo. It's longer than most other Roscoe shorts (30 whole minutes!) and no one seems to agree on who was behind the camera. Some sources claim it was directed by Mack Sennett (who produced it and has a cameo) and some claim it was directed by a minor silent actor/director named Charles Avery, who also appears. Letterboxd claims that Chaplin wrote it, though he only appears in one scene and he didn't write any other films for Arbuckle. No one seems to think Roscoe wrote or directed it - though he wrote and directed almost everything else he starred in by 1916, which is why some sources claim KNOCKOUT was made in 1914. But the FATTY & MABEL movies from 1914 (w/d by Sennett) are incredibly primitive and uneventful/boring, and the Sennett/Chaplin project THE FATAL MALLET from 1914 is repetitive and moronic. THE KNOCKOUT, however, is complex, professionally assembled, and climaxes in 10 minutes of ambitiously staged sprawling chaos - all hallmarks of Roscoe-as-auteur.
Roscoe is a seemingly nice dude named "Pug" who has a hot girlfriend played by the cute and lively Minta Durfee. Because Pug is a heavier guy and his girlfriend's a hottie, he's constantly fighting groups of dudes for her honor. I'd say he's justified when they start hurling bricks at Pug and Minta, and Minta is hit in the face by one. Pug starts swingin' and even lifting dudes above his head and throwin' 'em. More bodies fly through the air in THE KNOCKOUT than in an average issue of Jack Kirby's "Tales of Suspense".
For complicated plot reasons that are elaborated upon in the film but really unimportant, tough Pug is enlisted to enter the ring against a heavyweight boxer. Little Charlie Chaplin is the ref and gets knocked around a lot in the process. In spite of the film's title, the boxing match itself doesn't end in a K.O. and really the boxing is wholly tangential. Because -
In its final third, Pug flies into a literal psychopathic/homicidal rage, pulls out two handguns (Chow Yun-Fatt style) in the ring, and proceeds to pursue his opponent out of the arena and through the city, dual-wielding the pistols while still wearing boxing gloves and firing hundreds of rounds but never reloading.
This kind of insane gunplay is a fixture in multiple Arbuckle films and somehow never gets less absurdly funny. (As usual, someone gets shot in the backside.) The police respond en masse, pursuing Roscoe to little avail. Innocent bystanders are inconvenienced and enraged (but not wounded by stray rounds). The chase escalates onto and over the tops of tall buildings - and watching big Roscoe participating in a classic thriller rooftop chase is a singular sight indeed. Things get even more ridiculous by the end. Well, this one's pure Arbuckle.
4/5 If other Sennett and Chaplin films were like this, I'd be watching dozens of Sennett and Chaplin films instead of dozens of Arbuckle films, wouldn't I?
This is a rare early Roscoe Arbuckle vehicle shrouded in mystery. Roscoe stars in it w/o Buster but w/ Al St. John in a supporting role and w/ Charlie Chaplin in a pivotal cameo. It's longer than most other Roscoe shorts (30 whole minutes!) and no one seems to agree on who was behind the camera. Some sources claim it was directed by Mack Sennett (who produced it and has a cameo) and some claim it was directed by a minor silent actor/director named Charles Avery, who also appears. Letterboxd claims that Chaplin wrote it, though he only appears in one scene and he didn't write any other films for Arbuckle. No one seems to think Roscoe wrote or directed it - though he wrote and directed almost everything else he starred in by 1916, which is why some sources claim KNOCKOUT was made in 1914. But the FATTY & MABEL movies from 1914 (w/d by Sennett) are incredibly primitive and uneventful/boring, and the Sennett/Chaplin project THE FATAL MALLET from 1914 is repetitive and moronic. THE KNOCKOUT, however, is complex, professionally assembled, and climaxes in 10 minutes of ambitiously staged sprawling chaos - all hallmarks of Roscoe-as-auteur.
Roscoe is a seemingly nice dude named "Pug" who has a hot girlfriend played by the cute and lively Minta Durfee. Because Pug is a heavier guy and his girlfriend's a hottie, he's constantly fighting groups of dudes for her honor. I'd say he's justified when they start hurling bricks at Pug and Minta, and Minta is hit in the face by one. Pug starts swingin' and even lifting dudes above his head and throwin' 'em. More bodies fly through the air in THE KNOCKOUT than in an average issue of Jack Kirby's "Tales of Suspense".
For complicated plot reasons that are elaborated upon in the film but really unimportant, tough Pug is enlisted to enter the ring against a heavyweight boxer. Little Charlie Chaplin is the ref and gets knocked around a lot in the process. In spite of the film's title, the boxing match itself doesn't end in a K.O. and really the boxing is wholly tangential. Because -
In its final third, Pug flies into a literal psychopathic/homicidal rage, pulls out two handguns (Chow Yun-Fatt style) in the ring, and proceeds to pursue his opponent out of the arena and through the city, dual-wielding the pistols while still wearing boxing gloves and firing hundreds of rounds but never reloading.
This kind of insane gunplay is a fixture in multiple Arbuckle films and somehow never gets less absurdly funny. (As usual, someone gets shot in the backside.) The police respond en masse, pursuing Roscoe to little avail. Innocent bystanders are inconvenienced and enraged (but not wounded by stray rounds). The chase escalates onto and over the tops of tall buildings - and watching big Roscoe participating in a classic thriller rooftop chase is a singular sight indeed. Things get even more ridiculous by the end. Well, this one's pure Arbuckle.4/5 If other Sennett and Chaplin films were like this, I'd be watching dozens of Sennett and Chaplin films instead of dozens of Arbuckle films, wouldn't I?
#2
Television / Re: Joel sells out!
Last post by Rev. Powell - Today at 08:12:32 AMI don't think I'd count those as spoilers. I know this is subjective, but how would you rank this episode compared to previous seasons? I have relatively low expectations, I don't expect them to recapture top form. I'm hoping the best episodes will be as entertaining as an average episode from the sci-fi era, and at least as good as the episodes from the reboot's first season.
#3
Entertainment / Re: What have you been listeni...
Last post by Rev. Powell - Today at 08:00:23 AM
"Losey" by Gnoomes
#4
Good Movies / Re: The Last Flight of Noah's ...
Last post by M.10rda - Today at 07:36:15 AMYeah, that trope shows up in multiple late 70s and 80s bad movies.
#5
Television / Re: Joel sells out!
Last post by Sitting Duck - Today at 07:27:19 AMThe following should be spoiler-free. But since some might have different ideas as to what constitutes a spoiler, I'll black out the text anyway. Highlight at your own risk.
Saw this last Wednesday and it was a fun episode. The movie itself (from the director of Wild Rebels) was excruciating.
New hallway sequence has four sections. First a theater lobby, then a scene from 2001, then a scene from The Shining ("Come play with us, Mike. Forever!"), then a film repository (which had the Laserblast aliens during one passthrough).
Host segment count has been severely reduced. Basically, they are down to a prologue, an intermission, and an epilogue.
The opening shows Mike working at the Mooselick County Dairy Co-op. AFAIK there is no official word on whether or not it's the same place he was working at in 1985 as seen in Time Chasers.
Saw this last Wednesday and it was a fun episode. The movie itself (from the director of Wild Rebels) was excruciating.
New hallway sequence has four sections. First a theater lobby, then a scene from 2001, then a scene from The Shining ("Come play with us, Mike. Forever!"), then a film repository (which had the Laserblast aliens during one passthrough).
Host segment count has been severely reduced. Basically, they are down to a prologue, an intermission, and an epilogue.
The opening shows Mike working at the Mooselick County Dairy Co-op. AFAIK there is no official word on whether or not it's the same place he was working at in 1985 as seen in Time Chasers.
#7
Bad Movies / Re: Ratatoing
Last post by Trevor - Today at 06:57:08 AMQuote from: chainsaw midget on May 09, 2026, 07:17:59 PMI just found this one and had to share it. It looks less like a movie and more like a lowbudget budget Playstation 1 game.
Seriously. Check this out. I can already tell that there is no way I could sit through actually watching a full length movie of this.
rEH5Pa93_AQ
In case that doesn't show up right....
https://youtu.be/rEH5Pa93_AQ?si=f9nVlbFafnDGqM_i
It can't be as bad as THE LITTLE PANDA FIGHTER 😳😏😉🐢
#8
Bad Movies / Re: Invent A Bad Movie Title P...
Last post by zombie no.one - Today at 06:00:14 AMBottom Feeders Of The Deep
#9
Good Movies / Re: The Last Flight of Noah's ...
Last post by Dr. Whom - Today at 01:38:43 AMI was a kid in the late 70s, and at least in the Franco-belgian sphere, the lost Japanese soldier who kept on fighting was quite the trope in comics. If there was a remote island in the Pacific, you'd be sure to bump into some Japanese.
#10
Off Topic Discussion / Re: The New Happy Birthday Thr...
Last post by Trevor - Today at 12:25:46 AMQuote from: Ed, Ego and Superego on September 10, 2026, 04:00:47 PMHappy Birthday to YOU old Uncle Z.
Ed
Aw, thanks Ed ❤️🧟�♂️🧟�♂️🐢
My niece and nephew still call me that almost 20 years later.