Quote from: zombie no.one on September 30, 2025, 03:42:22 PMTheatrical release was 187 minutes. Director cut was around 200 minutes, give or take.Quote from: HappyGilmore on September 30, 2025, 02:22:57 PM71.) King Kong
2005. Naomi Watts and Jack Black star.
wow I would not have had that down as a 3 hour-er...
Quote from: HappyGilmore on September 30, 2025, 02:22:57 PM71.) King Kong
2005. Naomi Watts and Jack Black star.
Quote from: zombie no.one on September 22, 2025, 06:26:07 AMyep... any movie whose official runtime is 180 minutes or longer.
Quotefor the sake of argument let's say officially released directors' cuts qualify.
Quote from: Rev. Powell on September 30, 2025, 02:40:30 PMHmm, looks like THE WOLF OF WALL STREET is exactly 3 hours long, so not OVER 3 hours.I believe the Extended Version of Dances with Wolves is on the list, so extended cuts should count. Gonna need it cause can't think of many more that aren't rare or something.
I forget, did we say extended cuts are allowed?
Here's one we seem to have forgotten:
74. GRINDHOUSE (3 hours, 11 min.)
Quote from: zombie no.one on September 29, 2025, 01:35:41 AMI've always thought any film over 2 hours long really need to justify being so. like really really. time is a commodity.I generally feel 1hr 45min to 2hr 15mins is a decent time for a good movie. 1hr 45min for a comedy/horror and 2hr 15min for a decent drama or action fluck.
btw PARSIFAL should've been #66, as EMPIRE was reposted.
next is #67
EDIT - ah no it shouldn't... I see Trevor edited and corrected his previous posts numbers....
next is #68
I'm struggling to find any more!