- Welcome to Badmovies.org Forum.
Recent posts
#71
Good Movies / Re: IS IT PORN? (reviews and d...
Last post by M.10rda - September 12, 2026, 04:24:08 PMAlso, this:
#72
Good Movies / Re: IS IT PORN? (reviews and d...
Last post by M.10rda - September 12, 2026, 04:22:10 PMI'm excited about the upcoming Hallmark Family Holiday film: LET'S EAT GRANDMA! 
Speaking of miscategorized family films:
I just DLd HOUSE ON THE EDGE OF THE PARK from Soulseek.
The user I DL'd it from had it in a folder titled "Family Movies".
Oh boy.
I messaged him and mentioned this, just out of amusement. But I don't think he appreciated it.
Speaking of miscategorized family films:
I just DLd HOUSE ON THE EDGE OF THE PARK from Soulseek.
The user I DL'd it from had it in a folder titled "Family Movies".
Oh boy.
I messaged him and mentioned this, just out of amusement. But I don't think he appreciated it.
#73
Bad Movies / Re: RECENT VIEWINGS (Bad Movie...
Last post by M.10rda - September 12, 2026, 04:18:54 PMYou're right - SOMETHING WILD is a great movie. Again, when it comes to Griffith, maybe it's all about the hair!
#74
Bad Movies / Re: RECENT VIEWINGS (Bad Movie...
Last post by Dr. Whom - September 12, 2026, 03:32:41 PMWell it is dripping with 80s cool, and if my younger self had seen it at the time, I am sure I would have thought it ultra-cool
It has been a while since I've seen a movie with peak Melanie Griffith, but I saw Something Wild when it came out, and there she blew me away. I don't think Cherry 2000 would have had quite the same effect. Come to think of it, both movies have a similar premise: yuppie gets drawn into a violent adventure with a carefree woman. Something Wild does it infinitely better.
Not that there is that much wrong with Cherry 2000. In fact, I enjoyed it rather more than I thought I would, mainly because of the completely bonkers world building. It is just that it doesn't have that much going for it either. And that is my main criterium for deciding between the good movie/bad movie category: is it worth your time. Cherry 2000 is just too much by the numbers.
It has been a while since I've seen a movie with peak Melanie Griffith, but I saw Something Wild when it came out, and there she blew me away. I don't think Cherry 2000 would have had quite the same effect. Come to think of it, both movies have a similar premise: yuppie gets drawn into a violent adventure with a carefree woman. Something Wild does it infinitely better.
Not that there is that much wrong with Cherry 2000. In fact, I enjoyed it rather more than I thought I would, mainly because of the completely bonkers world building. It is just that it doesn't have that much going for it either. And that is my main criterium for deciding between the good movie/bad movie category: is it worth your time. Cherry 2000 is just too much by the numbers.
#76
Bad Movies / Re: 100 Movie Doctors
Last post by Alex - September 12, 2026, 11:36:21 AM2 Dr. Who and the Daleks (1965).
#77
Good Movies / Re: IS IT PORN? (reviews and d...
Last post by Rev. Powell - September 12, 2026, 10:27:32 AMShows the importance of punctuation: MAX AND HIS DOG DICK could be a very different movie than MAX AND HIS DOG, DICK.
#78
Good Movies / Re: IS IT PORN? (reviews and d...
Last post by M.10rda - September 12, 2026, 10:24:29 AMMAX AND HIS DOG DICK (1912): 
.......Okay, I couldn't help myself.
Of course this isn't Porn - but how could I refrain from posting a title like that in this thread?!
"Max" is director Max Linder, apparently an early French also-ran in the silent comedy star sweepstakes. He does have a dog and yes, the dog's name is Dick. Max also has a girlfriend and, to put any further confusion to rest, Dick and the girlfriend don't get along at all.
Was it worth watching this 10-ish minute movie just for the amusing title? Uhhh....... nope! This is maybe the most primitive silent film I've seen to date, almost wholly bereft of content or form.
Linder wasn't much of a filmmaker nor a comedian. Didk the Dog briefly talks on a telephone - that's something, I guess. 1/5
.......Okay, I couldn't help myself.
Of course this isn't Porn - but how could I refrain from posting a title like that in this thread?! "Max" is director Max Linder, apparently an early French also-ran in the silent comedy star sweepstakes. He does have a dog and yes, the dog's name is Dick. Max also has a girlfriend and, to put any further confusion to rest, Dick and the girlfriend don't get along at all.
Was it worth watching this 10-ish minute movie just for the amusing title? Uhhh....... nope! This is maybe the most primitive silent film I've seen to date, almost wholly bereft of content or form.
Linder wasn't much of a filmmaker nor a comedian. Didk the Dog briefly talks on a telephone - that's something, I guess. 1/5 #79
Bad Movies / 100 Movie Doctors
Last post by Rev. Powell - September 12, 2026, 10:19:30 AMRules: Name a title that has "Doctor" or "doctors" or "Dr." in it. Each Doctor may only appear once (in the case of franchises).
1. The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T. (1953)
1. The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T. (1953)