Main Menu

Roger Rabbit 2 ?

Started by Doggett, June 22, 2009, 08:02:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Doggett

June 22, 2009, 08:02:30 AM Last Edit: June 22, 2009, 08:04:12 AM by doggett
                                             

If God exists, why did he make me an atheist? Thats His first mistake.

Pilgermann

#1
June 22, 2009, 10:17:05 AM
Ugh, I thought Zemeckis would surely have all this motion capture crap out of his system by now...and why try and spoil such a great movie with a sequel that will surely suck?  Motion captured CGI characters just won't have the same appeal or be nearly as impressive as hand-drawn cel animation.
 

Jim H

#2
June 22, 2009, 06:36:01 PM
If they did it with CG and motion capture, it wouldn't even make any sense.  The characters are inherently 2D hand-drawn in the original, it would just be a ridiculous sequel that doesn't even make sense. 

Doggett

#3
June 23, 2009, 06:13:02 AM
Quote from: Jim H on June 22, 2009, 06:36:01 PM
If they did it with CG and motion capture, it wouldn't even make any sense.  The characters are inherently 2D hand-drawn in the original, it would just be a ridiculous sequel that doesn't even make sense. 

I think the character will still be 2D but they'll use computers to pull off some of the physical effects they couldn't do in 88.
                                             

If God exists, why did he make me an atheist? Thats His first mistake.

Psycho Circus

#4
July 02, 2009, 12:13:45 PM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!  :hatred:

BoyScoutKevin

#5
July 06, 2009, 04:29:44 PM
Well, they've only been talking about this since at least 2000/2001.  Of course, they started talking about "T2on," at about the same time, and it looks like we finally may get that one, so a "Roger Rabbit 2" is not impossible.

As a matter of record, they also talked about doing the following films . . .

"Buck Rogers"
"Gargoyles"
"The Love Boat"
"Rock 2"
"Sailor Moon"
"Dr. Who"
"Sixth Sense 2"
"Star Blazers"`
"Stretch Armstrong"
and "Country Bears 2"

Doggett

#6
July 06, 2009, 04:31:08 PM
I very much doubt there will be a Doctor Who film.
At least not for a few years.
                                             

If God exists, why did he make me an atheist? Thats His first mistake.

BoyScoutKevin

#7
July 06, 2009, 05:46:06 PM
Quote from: doggett on July 06, 2009, 04:31:08 PM
I very much doubt there will be a Doctor Who film.
At least not for a few years.

Actually, I very much doubt that any of these will ever see the light of day, but how long have they been talking about a sequel to "Tron," and it looks like we finally may get that, so who knows about the rest.

meQal

#8
July 06, 2009, 10:48:16 PM
Quote from: doggett on July 06, 2009, 04:31:08 PM
I very much doubt there will be a Doctor Who film.
At least not for a few years.
I gotta agree with doggett on this one. The revived series is going strong on both sides of the Atlantic.
Movie Trivia Fact : O.J. Simpson was considered for the title role in The Terminator, but producers feared he was \"too nice\" to be taken seriously as a cold-blooded killer.<br />Isn\'t hindsight great.<br />A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it. - Agent Kay - Men in Black

Jim H

#9
July 23, 2009, 02:57:37 PM
This is getting to be a bit of an old thread, but there was an update from Comic Con.

Zemeckis didn't confirm or deny Roger Rabbit 2, but he said if it did happen the 2D characters would REMAIN in 2D.

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/41789

Psycho Circus

#10
July 23, 2009, 03:00:38 PM
Quote from: Jim H on July 23, 2009, 02:57:37 PM
This is getting to be a bit of an old thread, but there was an update from Comic Con.

Zemeckis didn't confirm or deny Roger Rabbit 2, but he said if it did happen the 2D characters would REMAIN in 2D.

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/41789

He lies, he lies!  :hatred:
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions