Main Menu

Frankenstein (2025)

Started by Dr. Whom, Today at 05:28:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Dr. Whom

The Guilliermo del Toro version, of course.

For me, this is in the 'Beautiful but boring' category. I had given up on it about halfway, and had to push myself to finish it.

If you stick to the classic story (as here is the case), the main interest lies in the interaction between Frankenstein and the creature. Yet here the creature doesn't appear for the first hour or so. What you get is an extensive (and mostly by the numbers) backstory of Victor Frankenstein, which holds very little interest, as you know where it will lead to.
Once the creature appears, and we get its perspective, things get a lot more interesting. Seeing as the movie is on Netflix, I'd say do yourself a favour and fast forward through the first part.

Visually, it is stunning. Enormous care has gone into the production design, which is magnificent. It simply takes too long to get going, but that is a complaint I have with a lot of contemporary movies.
"Once you get past a certain threshold, everyone's problems are the same: fortifying your island and hiding the heat signature from your fusion reactor."

Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer? Ja! ... Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.

Alex

I've heard a lot of people say very similar things to you along the lines of visually stunning but hollow.
Hail to thyself
For I am my own master
I am my own god
I require no shepherd
For I am no sheep.