Who is worse?

[Leah]

Psst, you missed that smug face of his. And Boll just sucks, Wood was trying to be realistic, but it ended up being entertaining.

[Olivia Bauer]

Psst, you missed that smug face of his. And Boll just sucks, Wood was trying to be realistic, but it ended up being entertaining.

Look to the right of the image.

[Leah]

Psst, you missed that smug face of his. And Boll just sucks, Wood was trying to be realistic, but it ended up being entertaining.

Look to the right of the image.

no not him- The guy whose flipping off the camera guy should be blurred.

[Olivia Bauer]

Psst, you missed that smug face of his. And Boll just sucks, Wood was trying to be realistic, but it ended up being entertaining.

Look to the right of the image.

no not him- The guy whose flipping off the camera guy should be blurred.

That's the joke. Thanks.

[Skull]

Well, let's look at it like this.  If you gave Wood Uwe's budget and access to celebrities and people with talent he could have made something grand. 

my thoughts exactly...

If Uwe had Wood's resources, I doubt you'd get anything that even had the quality of a middle school play.... Well, actually he probably would have just shot you the bird if you told him to make a movie and then wandered off to do something else, but if he HAD to make a movie with those resources, he wouldn't have done good. 

I'm guessing worse then: Intercessor: Another Rock 'N' Roll Nightmare (Video 2005)

I cannot see how this guy can make a movie without a budget if he cannot make a movie with a budget.

[Olivia Bauer]

This is rather conclusive. Boll truely is worse. I wasn't expecting such a landslide.

[voltron]

I'm proud to say that I've never had to experience any of Boll's films. I'd rather watch a Wood creation over what passes for movies these days. Cliche? Maybe, but true.

[Kaseykockroach]

Michael Bay is worse than both combined, though out of the two, I'd pick Boll.