Main Menu

PSYCHO!

Started by Leah, June 24, 2009, 01:37:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Rev. Powell

Quote from: Mr. Briggs Inc. on June 30, 2009, 03:55:49 PM
Quote from: Allhallowsday on June 30, 2009, 02:50:52 PM
PSYCHO is great for any time.  The sequels are irrelevant.  Definitely one of the greatest Horror films.  
They may be irrelevant if you wish, but Psycho II is just as good. :tongueout:

I can see liking PSYCHO 2, but "just as good" really surprises me... to each his own, I guess.
I'll take you places the hand of man has not yet set foot...

HappyGilmore

Quote from: Allhallowsday on June 30, 2009, 04:01:44 PM
Quote from: Mr. Briggs Inc. on June 30, 2009, 03:55:49 PM
Quote from: Allhallowsday on June 30, 2009, 02:50:52 PM
PSYCHO is great for any time.  The sequels are irrelevant.  Definitely one of the greatest Horror films. 
They may be irrelevant if you wish, but Psycho II is just as good. :tongueout:
Let me clarify that they have nothing to do with the original film except being... "inspired" by it and TONY PERKINS in however many he's in. 
It is great for any time, yes, but I gotta say, I am the only one of my group of friends (we're young bucks), who actually admits to liking it.  They all like the modern 'horror', with the blood and guts and not much suspense kind.  I liked the sequels (all of which had Perkins, excluding the remake), but felt they could've just left it with having only one sequel.
"The path to Heaven runs through miles of clouded Hell."

Don't get too close, it's dark inside.
It's where my demons hide, it's where my demons hide.

Doc Daneeka

#17
Quote from: Rev. Powell on June 30, 2009, 08:10:15 PM
Quote from: Mr. Briggs Inc. on June 30, 2009, 03:55:49 PM
Quote from: Allhallowsday on June 30, 2009, 02:50:52 PM
PSYCHO is great for any time.  The sequels are irrelevant.  Definitely one of the greatest Horror films.  
They may be irrelevant if you wish, but Psycho II is just as good. :tongueout:

I can see liking PSYCHO 2, but "just as good" really surprises me... to each his own, I guess.
I enjoy it as it takes a film where the great threat is a nail-biting, hidden physical presence and successfully evolves to a film where the threat is (Seemingly) clear and psychological. It takes our established fears and turns them to sympathies all the while maintaining something of the classic frightening atmosphere; there is less suspense, but what is taken is traded for tension and mystery.

In my mind Bates was by far the most engrossing character in the original, with others being little more than confused victims. Psycho II adds dimension by deepening character development as we see a sane but fragile Norman, attempting to reason with past madness as well as cope with a society who sees him as a thing.

I feel Psycho and it's sequel are two very different films, but both are incredibly effective in their own ways.

https://www.youtube.com/user/silverspherechannel
For the latest on the fifth installment in Don Coscarelli's Phantasm saga.