Badmovies.org Forum

I mean hurt to watch as in hurt your soul. Stuff like CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST (1980)  or I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE (1978).
Stuff you don't wan't to watch with your girlfriend.

 I can kinda understand LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT.

I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE has NO redeeming qualities.


http://youtu.be/NxxHVHEBPtc (http://youtu.be/NxxHVHEBPtc)

Of course I bought a thing called SQUIRM FEST once- but I won't go into that.  :wink:

I loved I spit on your grave

WHY?
I'm serious. Why?
 Good photography? Great acting? Watching gang rape?  :question:

Funny how a lot of these things were produced around the same time.  It would be interesting to compare it with the social and political climate of that era, and other contemporary movies.  Death Wish was made in a time when NYC crime was absolutely at a peak, and it mirrored the thoughts of a lot of people, giving them a vicarious sense of (death) wish fulfillment.  Later movies of this type like Gran Torino and Harry Brown play to the same contemporary issues with gang violence, police ineffectiveness and the desire for vigilantism.

As for movies that you wouldn't watch with your girlfriend and have no redeeming qualities, it would be easy to compile a list based around themes of torture and abuse, and with zero plot or plots so flimsy that they serve only as a vague gauzy backdrop onto which the gore is splattered.

The Guinea Pig series
August Underground series
A Serbian Film (actually quite nicely shot, so maybe it has a redeeming quality, but don't watch with your girlfriend)
Megan is Missing
Violent Sh*t series

Yeah, don't watch these.  Just don't.

I still wanna know why Lester likes I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE.
Nobody likes that movie.

I can actually understand the extreme gore bulls**t that came out in later years. It was made to shock Fangoria geeks. It was made for that purpose. To shock with extreme gore and violence. ( I watched a few-didn't bother me. I knew it was all done to shock.)  But I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE was not. There was NO reason for this.

FAMILY PROPERTY: BACKWOODS HILLBILLY MASSACRE was so badly done it was just painful to watch.
But in terms of just being morally offensive, brutal, and irredeemably bad, I'd go with BULLY.
Just awful.

It's sh!t.  That's another example of BAD for you.  It is also bad.   :hatred: Torture porn. 


"IT'S ALIVE"  (1969 - a Larry Buchanan sh!t on rye).  Maybe the worst movie I've ever sat through; it's AWFUL.  And laughed!  But mostly BORING.  (Though better than torture porn.)

http://youtu.be/0oOwhOLeNcw (http://youtu.be/0oOwhOLeNcw)  




They're called torture porn.  I hear you. 

I'm sorry. I don't see IT'S ALIVE anywhere near the toture porn s**t. It was boring. I wanted more killer baby. It's not even in the same catogory.
Cmon, Hallows. It shouldn't even be in this topic.  :lookingup:

Since it's so horrible  its title cannot be spoken or written I will just say "the human(hundred legged arthopod)".

There is a sick joke of a movie called " gay ni--ers from outer space" who's only good quality is its merciful  brevity.

"Frankenstein's bloody nightmare.” is only good for warning people about the hazards of taking cheaply made LSD.

”assignment terror” was made by a coalition of Spanish Italian German filmakers because no one nation should have had to bear the sole blame for such an abomination.  It was an ultra cheap sf horror torture porn flick that managed to insult the movie histories of Frankenstein, Dracula, the wolfman and the mummy in one film. Micheal Rennie's presence could almost be considered a redeeming quality if seeing him in such a puddle of cinematic sewage did not make his fans weep for him. I wonder if Germany, Italy and Spain hated england so savagely they made this movie just to put a well known and respected English actor in it.

Where The Dead Go To Die

A pretentious pseudo-art film. It just does everything it can to try and shock the viewer.
For reference: there's a scene where a possessed black lab with an annoying voice sticks its head in a woman's vagina and rips her unborn baby out violently, killing her and it.
Then, after the mother dies they try to bring her back to life by having the son, who is a little boy, f**k the dog in the ass on top of his mom's corpse.
You might be surprised to know that scene didn't even gross me out or disturb me. It's impossible to be disturbed when you're dying from boredom.
Yes, a film that has the worst abortion ever and a bestiality/necrophilia threesome trudges along at a snail's pace and is filled with random images of terrible 3D models and miserable attempts at symbolism.

Frankly, the film offended me. Not because of the "disturbing" content but because trying to gross me out is all they have in their bag of tricks. The film thinks very little of it's audience and is high on it's own fumes. I ended up shutting it off, not out of disgust, but because I was worried someone might come in and see me watching it. I don't think there's anyway to explain my way out of that. I'd rather be caught jerking off to furry vore. The guy that made it isn't even a director. He's a DJ that tried to get into 3D animation and f**king sucks at it. His attempts to try disgust me with gross images is just sad to watch, like a fish out of water slowly suffocating, flopping around on the boat to no avail. It tried to take dark themes but didn't know what the hell to do with them.

Pathetic.

1/10

Nazi's At The Centre Of The Earth & Aliens Vs Predator 2.

For the first one, the 'abortion' scene and for the second, well so many reasons but I'll go with the maternity ward scene as the highlight of its bad taste.

Eli Roth's AFTERSHOCK (2012)

for having the most teeth-grindingly annoying set of characters I think I've ever seen in any film, ever.


The thing that I hated most about ISOYG was the Rick Moranis looking bad guy. the one who was clearly supposed to be retarded. he was so crap it hurt. I wouldn't say I completely hated the movie though, the main woman gave a decent performance IMO

I think your confusing It's Alive https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071675/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1 (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071675/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1) with It's Alive https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0063145/?ref_=fn_tt_tt_10. (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0063145/?ref_=fn_tt_tt_10.)

Man, you annoy the sh!t outta me.  Why don't you READ what I wrote?  I said "IT'S ALIVE" is better than torture porn.  It should be in this topic, YOUR TOPIC, because it is an AWFUL BAD MOVIE. 
 :hatred:

Can we just respect other people's choices even if we disagree with them? Do we have to bug someone over a choice because we don't agree with it? Christ I personally think "Indiana Jones and the temple of doom" is one of the worst movies ever made but if I listed it here some people would just go on a jihad to make me sayni was wrong. If you ask people's opinions please don't attack, or xxxxing nag, them for it.

BTW Rambo 2 really sucked. Blowing a guy to mist with an arrow? The soviet gunship rising ominously in front of a bloody sun with arforementioned sun  shining clearly thru the obviously empty rocket tubes, firing a bazooka inside a helicopter without cooking the men behind you, clearly showing the box that had smoke pouring out of it to make the copter look damaged...ghawdawful. And in a high budget movie.

You need to put a cork in it.  Ron and I are old friends.   :thumbup: :smile:

OK I didn't know that. It looked like you were snapping at him

He's as annoying as the day is long.  I also love him. 

Also having your explosives expert killed by one of his own explosives  :buggedout:

The Sinful Dwarf. I saw it 12 years ago and haven't felt completely clean since.

that's a load of horse hockey, sven. this is a DISCUSSION forum, not an opinion blog. do we argue, oh yes we do! and you know what? when we ask someone WHY, it's NOT to make them say they're wrong, it's because we want to KNOW why they think the way they do. asking why is NOT showing disrespect in any way, i don't know where you got that idea, unless you aren't grasping the purpose here. disrespect here, to me at least, is when you tell someone they're stupid for disagreeing with YOUR opinion, or bringing your opinion of an actor or director's personal life/convictions/political stance into a discussion of a MOVIE. that has no bearing on the MOVIE, see? example, i love polanski films, and woody allen films, and their personal lives have NOTHING to do with why i like their movies. can you see what i'm trying to say? i'm fine arguing my opinion of their lives any time, but that's totally separate. like the cosby situation. the personal crap has no bearing on the fact that i love his tv shows and concert films. i'm not making sense, i don't have the right words...

This would have been more interesting if they had recorded 90 minutes of a camera pointed at a concrete wall.

I haven't seen it in a long time and I have no plans to re-watch it, but I remember having a specific hatred towards "Humanoids of the Deep". I remember it being an incredibly repugnant concept and while I honestly do prefer to avoid any films or programs that include sexual violence (personal preference, I'd just rather not see that), I think that having anthropomorphic fish people doing exactly that to humans is gratuitous and I don't recall anything the movie had to redeem itself. Again, I haven't watched it in a long time, so I'm sorry if I'm remembering it wrong or missing key details. Just my personal thoughts.

Well, technocally HftD just delivered on what "creature from the black lagoon" implied. I mean what do you think ol gilly wanted that beautiful  brunette for? To vacuum and dust his grotto?

Well, I admit, I never thought about that, I still think it's perverted and unnecessary to have a monster literally rape a human onscreen. I know that plenty of other movies (including Creature from the Black Lagoon, like you said, as well as others such as Ro-Man) implied that the monsters had... plans, and while I think even that's not really necessary to develop a good plot featuring a monster (I mean, look at Godzilla, he just wanted to either blow up a city, or depending on his mood, go beat up another monster that also wanted to blow up a city, or go march around on his island, etc.), I think those movies still had at least some dignity with the fact that it was (usually) nothing more than a mere implication. Maybe they really did just want someone to tidy up their grotto? I'm sure it can get rather messy in there! :bouncegiggle:

I know I can be somewhat of a prude when it comes to movies, so perhaps it's just me on this one. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Ever wondered why King Kong wanted Fay Wray?

Attend a rhps audience participation show and you'll find out.

What I meant by 'AWFUL" was awful as in disgusting, perverted, and unclean AWFUL.
I guess I should have clarified that. Aw well...being as we're using a broader term than what I implied (instead of defined) then we'll go with the broader definition.
Sorry!

Ok- where was I? Oh yeah

the MEN BEHIND THE SUN (1988)
This movie made me physically ill. After this scene, I shut it off. I couldn't watch any more.

WARNING! Watch at your own risk!

http://youtu.be/doxI1F5fojg (http://youtu.be/doxI1F5fojg)

I'm not surprised "men behind the sun" was hard to watch. It's based on Japanese war crimes  that match or exceed anything the Nazis did.

I mentioned LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT (1972) in my first post. I can't say I enjoyed the film. But it drew me into it.
The acting is great. David Hess does a psycho well. And the others in the crew, including porn regular Fred Lincoln, are very believable.
There's a scene in the woods, right after that horrible rape and torture scene, where the 3 scum stand up and look at the blood all over them, and then at each other with expressions that seem to say " What the f**k is wrong with us?!" It's not something you usually see in this type of film.

Thanks for clarifying.  

Oh, and in the spirit of AWFUL Bad Movies : THE HOUSE ON THE EDGE OF THE PARK   (1980 aka LA CASA SPERDUTA NEL PARCO)

 :lookingup:  

http://youtu.be/6V7AqahaNq4 (http://youtu.be/6V7AqahaNq4)  

HOUSE OF THE PARK ON THE EDGE...   :question: :bouncegiggle: :thumbdown: :tongueout: :lookingup:

HOUSE OF THE PARK ON THE EDGE gon' gitchoo!!!  Total SH!T.  Inspired my "dumb film" reviews that nobody RED!  Red rum!  Red rum!!! 

I agree that HOUSE ON THE EDGE OF THE PARK is junk. Though David Hess is in it, and the premise is about the same as LAST HOUSE, it just doesn't pack the same punch. It's just a revolting mess. Worse, a BORING revolting mess. A film of this type is meant to shock- this is just not well written or directed. It's bland.

I hate LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT.   

Here's my "review" of HOUSE ON THE EDGE OF THE PARK:

http://www.badmovies.org/forum/index.php/topic,114234.0.html   

Check out the trailer, in it, the trailer announces the movie as: HOUSE OF THE PARK ON THE EDGE...   :bouncegiggle:

Dam- I just looked through that whole thread. Lots of the folks who posted there, including our fearless leader Andrew, are gone.

it's strange how David Hess is good in LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT but the other films I've seen him in where he essentially plays the same character (HOUSE ON THE EDGE OF THE PARK and HITCH HIKE) he is really annoying.

I used to have a double disc edition of LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT. it had bonus scratchy footage of stuff they weren't allowed to include. - really horrible stuff like the girls being forced to wet themselves. wtf

That's odd. The VHS I got from Video Vortex in 1997 (a now defunct mail  order company out of Canada)  had that scene, plus a few others that were not on the US releases intact!

I think I saw LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT  on videotape, and it included the p!ss scene.  I think it's one of the reasons I hate that movie.  Ugh.  I just hate it.  I watched LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT once, though I'm well aware of it.  I've avoided it for close to 30 years.  DAVID HESS is not GOOD in LHOTL, the DIRECTION is good.  I think cruel might be the easiest emotion to play, so any no-talent with presence could've played the part of sh!t.  Did I mention I HATE that movie?   :hatred: :teddyr: :bluesad:  LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT is better, but I still rank it with sh!t like I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE. 

Shoot me for this but I think I Spit On Your Grave has it's merits compared to utter trash like House On The Edge Of The Park. f**k that one, f**k Cannibal Holocaust, f**k DEODATO.

I agree with CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST. I bought the Special Edition DVD a few years back-having never seen it ,I wanted to see what all the hullabaloo was about. I sold it for a dollar to a used video game/ DVD store in Paw Paw about a month later.

In the context of your statement, you're absolutely right.  I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE is a film I despise because of its content, but it is certainly better than the trash you cited. 


I cannot help but confuse CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST with CANNIBAL FEROX (MAKE THEM DIE SLOWLY).  Are the plots similar?  
I know I hated that CANNIBAL FEROX but it was so poorly made, it is more tolerable than LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT.  

I love "Gay n****rs from Outer Space"!   Seriously... the movie lives up to the title.  Just don't make a drinking game of how many times a character says the title of the movie.. you will die of alcohol poisoning 10 minutes in.

For me, if a movie lives up to the title, I'm hooked.   Although "Paint your Wagon" is the exception.. not one person in that movie paints one single wagon. However, it defies the musical genre.

I want to say that Fun In Balloonland is the worst children's film ever made, simply because everything is wrong with it (be it bad audio or having a horny narrator sound like orgasming at the sight of balloons), but I think I know of one worse: A Christmas Elf (Named Calvin), simply because it's a 70 minute "film" made from still shots.
I've seen Manos without the bots. I've seen Monster A Go Go without the bots. Both were painful in how boring and nonsensical the plots were. I still would rather watch both of them than watch Fun In Balloonland.

I'm only naming this movie to warn people not to see it,  so if you watch and need therapy later don't send me the bills.

''I saw the devil'' is a south Korean movie that makes me wonder if south Korea is the good Korea then how xxxxed up does noetk Korea have to be to be the bad one?!?!

Murder porn,  torture porn,  revenge porn, gross out porn,  you name it. A miserable movie that will make you consdier suicide when you're not vomiting at the site of a guy graphically going thru a big log of human excrement with his bare hands.

If the above disgusted you enough to keep you from ever see I g this movie,  you should be grateful to me.

Never seen I Saw the Devil but I'm intrigued by it's 7.8/10 IMDb and 80% Fresh RT ratings!

Bucky Larson - the worst movie of all time. There is nothing of value in this movie. The only person in this who didn't embarrass themselves in this was Christina Ricci. Not just bad, this is offensively bad. After surviving this I stopped watching bad movies for a long time.

! No longer available (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bL-Ww3wcSWo#)

I've seen Bucky Larson, it's pure bliss compared to Hip Hop Locos (2001).
I've said it once and I'm saying it again. I dare anyone to watch Hip Hop Locos (2001)  :bouncegiggle:

THE BLOOD SHED.  I have an old review of it on here somewhere.  It is BEYOND awful!

I think I would actually like to watch this one...


(http://i.imgur.com/OmFJ1Ok.jpg)

I want to watch the trilogy of Deodato's cannibal films; Jungle Holocaust, Cannibal Holocaust, and Cut and Run, as well as the non sequel Cannibal Holocaust 2.

Cut And Run is a Deodato film? I never knew that. It was advertised in the local video shop back in the 80s. Man, I miss the 80s, but I digress.

In the same light, I watched a few scenes from The Green Inferno (2013) and was like, wtf, never watching that movie ever.